Respondents. STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Stipulated Settlement Agreement (Agreement) is entered into by and between Friends of Animals and the Audubon Society of Greater Denver (collectively, FOA) and Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) (collectively, Petitioners) and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), Xxx Xxxxx, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Service, and Xxxx Xxxxx, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior (collectively, Respondents), who, by and through their undersigned counsel, state as follows:
Respondents. Businesses or other for profit; not-for-profit institutions. Number of Respondents: 70 (2 notifications per respondent). Estimated Time Per Response: 1.0 hours.
Respondents. Individuals or household; business or other for-profit; not-for-profit institutions; and state, local or tribal government. Number of Respondents and Responses: 36,300 respondents and 36,300 responses. Estimated Time per Response: 0.14 hours.
Respondents. State and local governments; profit and nonprofit businesses and organizations receiving grants from HHS; Total Number of
Respondents. Six hundred and seventy-five teachers responded to the questionnaire (24% of the total number of teachers). Three hundred and thirty-three teachers in secondary education (26% of the total number of teachers) and 342 teachers in higher education (24% of the total number of teachers) completed the questionnaire. A total of 119 (4%) of the teachers filled in the non-response form. In secondary education, 32 teachers filled in the form, indicating as the main reason: ‘lack of time’ (n=12) or ‘other reason’, which ranged from ‘personal circumstances’ to ‘not teaching in the higher grades’. In higher education, 87 teachers filled in the non-response form and their main reasons for not responding were ‘other reason’, which ranged from criticism on the questionnaire to not speaking Dutch (n=46). An overview of the response is given per group of teachers in Table 4.3. Table 4.3 Response to Questionnaire in Secondary and Higher Education Secondary education teachers University teachers Questionnaires sent 1290 1422 Completed questionnaires 333 (26%) 342 (24%) Non-response form 32 (2%) 87 (6%) Total response 365 (28%) 429 (30%)
Respondents. Petition under Article 226 of the constitution oif India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed. herein the High Court will be pleased to issue an appropriate ordr, direction or writ more particularly in the nature of mandamus and declare the action of 2nd and 3rd Respondents herein taking a stand that the said two documents Nos. Viz,80/2002 and 713/ 2002 as conveyance on sale chargeable under Article 47A of Schedule IA of India Stamp Act, 1899 by the Respondents 2 and 3 herein, as arbitrary, discriminatory illegal and in violation of the provisions of the Act, as well as the rights of the Petitioner and issue consequential direction to the Respondents herein to treal the said registered documents Viz., Nos.80/2002, 713/2002/ DR/LAR, Dt. 21.7.2009 as release deeds. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. X.X. XXX Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following : Order ORDER: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE XXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX (W.P. NO : 19981 of 2010) This writ petition is directed against the order passed on 21-07-2009 by the Collector under. Section 41-A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and District Registrar, Hyderabad (South), directing the writ petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.95,545/-, towards the deficit stamp duty in respect of two documents bearing No. 80/2002 and 713/2002, and also the orders passed by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority and Commissioner & Inspector General of Registration and Stamps, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, through his proceeding dated 20-07-2010, rejecting the Appeal preferre by the petitioner against the aforementioned ordrs passed by the Collector. One Xxx X. Xxxxxxxxxx Xxx, the husband of the petitioner, acquired house property bearing municipal No.8-3-315/C/5, admeasuring 253 square yards or 211.54 square meters, situate at Maruthinagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad, under a registered sale deed bearing docu- ment Sri G.V.S. Xxx Xxxxx, Smt. X.X. Xxxxxxx and Xxx X. Xxxxx Xxx, Thus, the petitioner herein and her four children, referred to supra, succeeded to the estate of Xxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxx. On 07-01-2002, G.V.S. Xxx Xxxxx, Smt. X.X. Xxxxxxx and Xxx X. XXxxx Xxx, joined together and executied a release deed bearing No.80/2002 in favour of the writ petitioner herein releas- ing and relinquishing their 3/5th undivided share in hours property bearing municipal No.8-3- 315/C/5, Maruthinagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad, for a total consideration of Rs. 1,50,000/-. The said release deed is appropriately s...
Respondents agree the terms of this Agreement shall be subject to public disclosure unless Complainant and Respondents agree otherwise, and the Commission determines that disclosure is not necessary to further the purposes of Iowa Code Chapter 216 relating to unfair or discriminatory practices in housing or real estate. Release
Respondents. X TO ALL TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS SHALL COME OR MAY CONCERN, KNOW THAT XXXXX XXXXXX CARRET & CO., LLC (hereinafter referred to as “BMC” or “Releasor”), for good and valuable consideration received from ECO2 PLASTICS INC., f/k/a ITEC ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INC. and XXXX DE LAURENTIIS (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Itec” or “Releasees”), the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, covenants not to xxx and hereby releases and discharges Releasees, Releasees’ current or former officers, directors, members, partners, employees, agents, affiliates, parents, subsidiaries, alter-egos, predecessors, successors or assigns or otherwise related entities, attorneys, and insurers, from all actions, causes of action, suits, debts, dues, sums of money, accounts, reckonings, bonds, bills, specialties, covenants, contracts, controversies, agreements, promises, variances, trespasses, damages, judgments, extents, executions, claims and demands whatsoever in law, admiralty or equity, which the Releasor, Releasor’s current or former officers, directors, members, partners, employees, agents, affiliates, parents, subsidiaries, alter-egos, predecessors, successors or assigns or otherwise related entities, attorneys, insurers, heirs, executors or administrators, ever had, now have or hereafter can, shall or may have from the beginning of the world to the date of this General Release, including but not limited to any claim, counterclaim or cause of action which was or could have been asserted in, or which arise from any of the facts or transactions that form the basis for any claim or counterclaim, set forth in any pleading filed in any action which was pending or in an arbitration entitled Xxxxx Xxxxxx Carret & Co., LLC v. ECO2 Plastics Inc., f/k/a Itec Environmental Group, Inc. and Xxxx De Laurentiis, NASD Docket No.: 06-04871. Releasor agrees and fully understands that this is a full and final General Release applying to all known, unknown, anticipated and unanticipated injuries and damages from the beginning of the world to the date of this Release, including any and all claims now existing or which may arise in the future, arising out of the alleged circumstances, incidents or events set forth in the Action. Releasor expressly waives any right or claim of right to assert hereafter that any claim, demand or obligation and/or cause of action has, through ignorance, oversight or error, been omitted from the terms of this General Release, and further expressly waives any ri...
Respondents. The above-entitled action having been fully compromised and settled, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that the parties, through their undersigned counsel, do execute this stipulation based on the full compromise of the claims herein, and do stipulate that the matter be dismissed with prejudice with each party bearing its own costs and disbursements. XXXXXXX, XXXXXXXXXXX & XXXX, P.A. Dated: Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx (#0397420) Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx (#0397303) 000 Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx 0000 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: 000-000-0000 Email: xxxxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx xxxxxxx.xxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER CITY OF RED WING XXXX & XXXXXXX Dated: Xxxx X. Xxxxxxxx (# ) 000 Xxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx 0000 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Email: xxxx.xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx
Respondents. XXX X. XXXXXX ½ AND XXXXX X. XXXXXX ½ TRUST 0000 Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxx 00000 XXXXX X. XXXXXX 0000 Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxx 00000 XXX X. XXXXXX (DECEASED) 0000 Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxx 00000 XXXXXX XXXXXXXX Iowa Civil Rights Commission 000 Xxxx 00xx Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxx, Xxxx 00000 and IOWA CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION 000 Xxxx 00xx Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxx, Xxxx 00000 Description of the Parties: Complainant is a member of the Iowa Civil Rights Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission). As a member, Complainant has the authority to file a complaint alleging a discriminatory practice in violation of the “Iowa Civil Rights Act of 1965,” Iowa Code Chapter 216. Complainant alleged Respondents failed to provide a reasonable accommodation by refusing to waive their “no-pets” policy for an assistance animal and this resulted in different terms, conditions or privileges of rental, and a denial of rental housing based on disability. Respondents own or manage the subject property, a two-bedroom four-plex, located at 0000 Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx, Xxxx 00000. Based on information provided by Respondents’ attorney, Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx, and verified by the Commission, Xxx X. Xxxxxx will be removed as a signatory. Respondent Xxx X. Xxxxxx died on June 27, 2005 A complaint having been filed by Complainant against Respondents with the Commission under Iowa Code Chapter 216 and there having been a preliminary inquiry, the parties do hereby agree and settle the above-captioned matter in the following extent and manner: Acknowledgment of Fair Housing Laws
