Record of Decision. Official report that documents the selected remedy, after consideration of public comments; commits Department of Energy to implement it • Remedial Action Implementation Plan – Plan that describes how the selected remedy will be implemented: design summary, permitting, construction & operation, maintenance, etc. • Land Use Control Implementation Plan – Plan that describes how the land use controls selected in the Record of Decision will be implemented, maintained, monitored, enforced, and reported • Removal Site Evaluation Report/Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis – Report that describes removal alternatives and objectives, and selects the preferred removal action alternative to address the potential threat to human health and/or the environment; 30-day public comment period Work Activities • “Field Start” – beginning of remedial investigation (typically sampling or well construction) after approval of Remedial Investigation Work Plan • “Remedial Action Start” – beginning of construction or site preparation activities after approval of Remedial Action Implementation Plan For Liquid Waste Tanks
Record of Decision. 00-00 Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Environmental Restoration Project Utica, Oneida County Site No. B00063 March 2011 Prepared by Division of Environmental Remediation New York State Department of Environmental Conservation DECLARATION STATEMENT - RECORD OF DECISION 00-00 Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Environmental Restoration Project Utica, Oneida County Site No. B00063 March 2011
Record of Decision. In situ source treatment using EISB with interim LUCs was not evaluated for the source zone at SWMU 211-A in the revised focused feasibility study (FFS) based on low technical implementability when compared to other alternatives (DOE 2011). Subsequent to the final evaluation in the revised FFS, however, DOE determined that EISB would be applicable to SWMU 211-A using pressure injection methods, as opposed to gravity injection and infiltration, which was evaluated in the revised FFS for SWMU 1. This determination was based on the larger grain-size soils that make up the UCRS soils at the C-720 area (DOE 2012). For Alternative 8 of the ROD, which included application of EISB at SWMU 211-A, the ROD anticipated that the number of injection points required for the SWMU 211-A treatment area would be determined in the design phase, but for costing purposes in the ROD, it was assumed that the SWMU 211-A treatment area would have six injection points. The MW network was expected to include four xxxxx (XXX 2012). The ROD also assumed that a bioamendment mixture (i.e., microbes, nutrients, reductants) would be introduced into the subsurface via vertical injection xxxxx. The specific bioamendment mixture would be determined through the use of sample results from the RDSI (DOE 2012). The ROD cost estimate for Alternative 8, In Situ Source Treatment Using Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation with Interim LUCs, for SWMU 211-A was $3.7M, and was based on the best available information in regard to the anticipated implementation costs of the remedial alternative. Per the ROD, an RDSI would be performed to better determine the extent and distribution of VOCs, which included dense nonaqueous- phase liquid TCE, and the UCRS soil and groundwater parameters specific to the EISB technology. As a result, changes to the cost elements were anticipated to occur because of new information and data collected during the engineering design of the remedial alternative (DOE 2012).
Record of Decision. The official Agency document that explains which remedial cleanup alternatives have been considered, the selected remedy, technical background relative to the decision, and how the decision complies with the law.
Record of Decision. As described in Section 5.2 above, FUSRAP will prepare a ROD to specify remedies, or to specify “No Further Action”, as appropriate, at the Firing Site, Yards C, G, and L, and Warehouse 3-01. Also as described previously, depending on findings from the RI, a modification of existing IAAAP RODs may be required to address contamination at Line 1 and the West Burn Pads (Area South of the Road). It should be noted that the Parties are presently planning to modify the 1998 Interim Soils ROD to revise remediation goals for radiological constituents that are specified in that ROD. Subsequent to the ROD, it was determined that the remediation goals for radiological constituents were consistent with background levels and thus inappropriate.
Record of Decision. Consistent with the NCP, on the basis of the findings of the RI/FS, the Agency issues a decision describing appropriate actions to be taken to protect human health and the environment. The ROD generally explains the selection of the final remedy based on relevant facts, analyses and policy considerations.
Record of Decision. Construction of the Hualapai Water Project shall not com- mence until the Secretary issues a record of decision after completion of an environ- mental impact statement for the Hualapai Water Project.
Record of Decision. (ROD) shall mean the document issued which describes a remedial action plan for an Operable Unit pursuant to Section 117(b) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9617 and shall be consistent with 40 C.F.R. 300.430(f)(5).
Record of Decision. The BLM shall have issued the Record of Decision with respect to the Mount Hope Project and the BLM shall have approved the Plan of Operations (collectively, the “ROD”) on or before the date that is the earlier of (A) nine months after the publication of the Draft EIS; and (B) September 30, 2012.”
Record of Decision. (for NEPA XXXx only) - A record of decision must identify all alternatives considered and specify the alternative or alternatives that were considered to be environmentally preferable. The record of decision must state whether all practicable means to avoid or minimize environmental harm from the alternative have been adopted, and, if not, why they were not.
