Rebuttable Presumption. Section 3. For purposes of the determination or opinion referred to in clause (c) of Section 1 of this Article VIII or clauses (x) or (y) of Section 2 of this Article VIII, the majority of disinterested Trustees acting on the matter or independent legal counsel, as the case may be, shall be entitled to rely upon a rebuttable presumption that the Covered Person has not engaged in willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such Covered Person’s office.
Rebuttable Presumption. For purposes of the determination as to whether indemnification is available under this Article IX, the court or other authority making the determination, as the case may be, shall rely upon a rebuttable presumption that the Covered Person has not engaged in willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such Covered Person's office.
Rebuttable Presumption. Section 3. For purposes of the determination or opinion referred to in clause (c) of Section 1 of this Article VIII or clauses (x) or (y) of Section 2 of this Article VIII, the majority of the Trustees who are disinterested persons and who are not Interested Persons of the Trust acting on the matter or independent legal counsel, as the case may be, shall be entitled to rely upon a rebuttable presumption that the Covered Person has not engaged in willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such Covered Person’s office.
Rebuttable Presumption. In any determination by the Independent Trustees or Independent Counsel, the Trustee shall be afforded a rebuttable presumption that the Trustee did not engage in Disabling Conduct.
Rebuttable Presumption. Section 3. For purposes of the determination or opinion referred to in clause (c) of Section 1 of this Article VIII or clauses (x) or (y) of Section 2 of this Article VIII, the majority of disinterested Trustees acting on the matter or independent legal counsel, as the case may be, shall be entitled to rely upon a rebuttable presumption that the Covered Person acted in good faith in the reasonable belief that such Covered Person’s action was in the best interests of the Trust or was at least not opposed to the best interests of the Trust and that the Covered Person has not engaged in willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such Covered Person’s office.
Rebuttable Presumption. 28 Section 3. Indemnification Not Exclusive............................................................28
Rebuttable Presumption. SECTION 3. For purposes of the determination or opinion referred to in clause (c) of Section 1 of this Article VIII or clauses (x) or (y) of Section 2 of this Article VIII, the majority of Trustees who are disinterested persons and who are not Interested Persons of the Trust acting on the matter or independent legal counsel, as the case may be, shall be entitled to rely upon a rebuttable presumption that the Covered Person has not engaged in willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such Covered Person's office.
Rebuttable Presumption. In any determination by the Independent Directors or Independent Counsel, the Director shall be afforded a rebuttable presumption that the Director did not engage in Disabling Conduct.
Rebuttable Presumption. Section 3. For purposes of the determination or opinion referred to in clause (c) of Section 1 of this Article VIII or clauses (x) or (y) of Section 2 of this Article VIII, the majority of the disinterested Trustees of the Trust acting on the matter or independent legal counsel, as the case may be, shall be entitled to rely upon a rebuttable presumption that the Covered Person acted in good faith in the reasonable belief that such Covered Person’s action was in the best interests of the Trust or that such Covered Person’s action was at least not opposed to the best interests of the Trust and has not engaged in willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such Covered Person’s office.
Rebuttable Presumption. For the determination of eligibility for Workers’ Compensation and benefits a positive test creates a “rebuttable presumption:” (1) if an employee has been injured and the Employer had reasonable cause to suspect the employee may be intoxicated or under the influence of a controlled substance not prescribed by his/her doctor, or (2) at the request of a police officer pursuant to a traffic stop and not at the request of the employee’s employer, or (3) at the request of a licensed physician who is not employed by the employee’s employer. Facts and inferences may be based on, but not limited to: (1) Observable phenomena, such as direct observation of use, possession, or distribution of alcohol or a controlled substance, or of the physical symptoms of being under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance, such as but not limited to slurred speech, dilated pupils, odor of alcohol or a controlled substance, changes in affect, or dynamic mood swings; (2) A pattern of abnormal conduct, erratic or aberrant behavior, or deteriorating work performance such as frequent absenteeism, excessive tardiness, or recurrent accidents, that appears to be related to the use of alcohol or a controlled substance, and does not appear to be attributable to other factors; (3) The identification of an employee as the focus of a criminal investigation into unauthorized possession, use, or trafficking of a controlled substance; (4) A report of use of alcohol or a controlled substance provided by a reliable and credible source; (5) Repeated or flagrant violations of the safety or work rules of the employee’s employer, that are determined by the employee’s supervisor to pose a substantial risk of physical injury or property damage and that appear to be related to the use of alcohol or a controlled substance and that do not appear attributable to other factors. Explanation: Pursuant to HB 223/ORC 4123.54 positive tests create “rebuttable presumption” for the eligibility for Workers’ Compensation and benefits. Instructions: Employer representatives should contact DAS, HRD, Office of Policy Development for information and assistance in administering the program.
