Qualification Questions Clause Examples

Qualification Questions. The intent of the Qualification Questions is to determine if Respondents are capable and willing to meet the mandatory requirements of this solicitation. Respondents will submit Yes / No answers to each mandatory question within the MFMP Sourcing Tool. All of the submitted responses to the qualification questions in the MFMP Sourcing Tool will be reviewed by the Procurement Officer. Respondents that answer “No” to any of the mandatory requirements will not have their remaining Technical or ▇▇▇▇▇ proposal scored and will be disqualified to participate in this solicitation.. Respondents that answer “Yes” with all the qualification questions by answering “Yes” to all of the mandatory requirements will be evaluated on their Technical Proposals. Applicants should use care and integrity in preparing their responses to the qualification questions, since these are mandatory requirements and will not be negotiable during the solicitation process.

Qualification Questions. Responding vendors shall submit a Yes/No Reply to the following Qualification Questions within MFMP. A responding vendor must meet the qualifications identified and certify their compliance with the requirements in the following Qualification Questions in order to be considered Responsible and Responsive for award. Vendors must answer all qualifying questions truthfully. VENDORS THAT ANSWER ‘NO’ TO ANY OF THE QUALIFICATION QUESTIONS WILL BE CONSIDERED NON-RESPONSIVE AND THEIR REPLIES WILL NOT BE EVALUATED. Qualification Questions Question 1 Does Respondent certify that the person submitting the reply is authorized to submit a reply on behalf of their company? Question 2 Does the Respondent certify that their company is an authorized LSP for Microsoft software licenses, maintenance and services? Question 3 Does the Respondent certify that it has at least five years’ experience providing Microsoft software licenses, maintenance and services described in this solicitation to other government entities similar in size and buying power to Florida from October 1, 2009 to the present? Question 4 Does Respondent certify that it is not a Discriminatory Vendor or Convicted Vendor as defined in sections 7 and 8 of the PUR 1001? Question 5 Does Respondent certify that it is not on the Suspended / Complaints to Vendor lists? Click on this link to confirm: lists Question 6 Does Respondent certify that it is not on the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in Sudan List or the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in the Iran Petroleum Energy Sector List pursuant to section 215.473, Florida Statutes? Question 7 Does Respondent certify its representation that all the statements contained within section 9 of PUR 1001 (Respondents Representation and Authorization) are true as applied to Respondent? Question 8 Does the Respondent certify that it will, if awarded, submit to the Department, at least annually, a completed and signed Preferred Pricing Affidavit as outlined in subsection 4.4.1.5 and required by 6.10? Question 9 Does the Respondent certify that it has an ACTIVE registration with the Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations?

Qualification Questions. Respondents shall submit a Yes/No response to the following Qualification Questions within MFMP Sourcing. A Respondent must meet the requirements identified and certify their compliance with the requirements through the following questions in order to be considered responsive and responsible. Respondents that answer “no” to any of the Qualification Questions shall be deemed non-responsive.

Qualification Questions. Applicant must submit a Yes/No response to the following Qualification Questions. Applicants are to meet to the qualifications identified in the following Qualification Questions in order to be considered responsive. DEO will not evaluate Applications from Applicants who answer “No” to any of the Qualification Questions, following the RFA Completeness Check. Does the Applicant certify that the proposal Application does NOT include on-base military construction projects? All Applications will be reviewed and evaluated based on community need, commitment, previous performance, and proposed actions in accordance with the following criteria: EVALUATION CRITERIA MAXIMUM POINTS AVAILABLE Applicant provided an eligible project per the requirements of s. 288.980, F.S.; 10 Applicant prepared a coordinated plan of action or scope of work delineating how the eligible project will be administered and accomplished; 10 Applicant provided a clear description and explanation of the proposed tasks and deliverables expected to be completed in the proposed project; 10 Applicant provided documentation describing the project and how it relates to the mission of its local military installation(s) and the potential impacts such changes will have on the local community; 10 Applicant agreed to match at least 30% of any grant awarded, based on the match documentation provided; 10 Project provides value to both the local community and the military installation; 5 Project provides a description on the current and future mission capabilities and the impact on operational readiness of the United States Department of Defense’s total force, including the impact on joint warfighting, training, and readiness; 5 Project will diversify the economy of the local community; 5 Project enables the base to better accommodate contingency, mobilization, resiliency, and future total force requirements; 5 Project supports diversification efforts in the event there should be a need for the reuse of a closed facility or realigned military installation; 5 The plan of action or scope of work is cost effective and reasonable to the provided deliverables and tasks to be completed; 5 Project provides a local economic benefit to the community; 5 Project has a reasonable estimated length of time for completion; 5 Applicant provided letters in support of the project. 5 Bonus: Matching Funds Proposed Greater Than 30 Percent 81 – 100% 56 – 80% 31 – 55% 5 3 2 To ensure that your Application can be accepted, please...