Public Interest Sample Clauses

Public Interest. 11. It is in the public interest that the Executive Director issue orders under section 161 of the Act. Undertaking
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Public Interest. The second issue that needs to be addressed by the Commission in approving or rejecting a negotiated agreement under Section 252(e)(2)(A) is whether it is contrary to the public interest, convenience, and necessity. I recommend that the Commission examine the Amendment on the basis of economic efficiency, equity, past Commission orders, and state and federal law to determine if the Amendment is consistent with the public interest. Nothing in this Amendment leads me to the conclusion that the Amendment is inequitable, inconsistent with past Commission Orders, or in violation of state or federal law. Therefore, I recommend that the Commission approve this Amendment.
Public Interest. 3.7.1 If consent to share information has not been given, a professional must consider whether there is a pressing need to disclose the information. The rule of proportionality should be applied to ensure a fair balance is achieved between the public interests in safeguarding the Adult at Risk, the provision of confidential services, and the private rights and interests of the individual affected. The same overall test is applied whether the data subject is the Adult at Risk, the suspected perpetrator of abuse or a third party.
Public Interest. 9. Xxxxx acted contrary to the public interest by engaging in the conduct set out above. Undertaking
Public Interest. Lessor is obligated to act in the public interest and must operate the Airport and offer access to all users in a fair, reasonable and not unjustly discriminatory manner. Therefore, in executing this Agreement and its provisions and in any future amendments, or changes to it, Lessor is and will in the future act with the intent to carry out this provision.
Public Interest. The disclosure passes the first test only if it furthers the specific public interest of being likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of government operations or activities, regardless of any other public interest it may fur- ther. In analyzing this question, we will consider the following factors:
Public Interest. The second issue that needs to be addressed by the Commission in approving or rejecting a negotiated agreement under Section 252(e)(2)(A) is whether it is contrary to the public interest, convenience, and necessity. I recommend that the Commission examine the agreement on the basis of economic efficiency, equity, past Commission orders, and state and federal law to determine if the agreement is consistent with the public interest. In previous dockets, Staff took the position that negotiated agreements should be considered economically efficient if the services are priced at or above their Long Run Service Incremental Costs (“LRSICs”). Requiring that a service be priced at or above its LRSIC ensures that the service is not being subsidized and complies with the Commission’s pricing policy. All of the services in this agreement are priced at or above their respective LRSICs. Therefore, this agreement should not be considered economically inefficient. Nothing in this agreement leads me to the conclusion that the agreement is inequitable, inconsistent with past Commission Orders, or in violation of state or federal law. Therefore, I recommend that the Commission approve this agreement.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Public Interest. The Project is in public interest.
Public Interest. The second issue that must be addressed by the Commission in approving or rejecting a negotiated agreement under Section 252(e)(2)(A) is whether it is contrary to the public interest, convenience, and necessity. I recommend that the Commission examine the agreement on the basis of economic efficiency, equity, past Commission orders, and state and federal law to determine if the agreement is consistent with the public interest. Several provisions contained in this interconnection agreement address issues that are currently before the Commission. Rates and terms for DSL and Line sharing are being disputed in Docket 00-0393; Non-recurring charges are being investigated in 98-0396; Collocation terms and rates are being investigated in docket 99-0615; Dark Fiber provisioning in being investigated in Docket 00-0538/00-0539; and Shared Transport and the UNE-Platform are being investigated in Docket 00-0700. Because these investigations are ongoing, it is unclear if these terms and conditions will comply with the Commission’s final orders on these subjects. However, Section 21 of this Interconnection Agreement provides that, in the event of any change in the regulatory environment that affects this agreement, the parties will expend diligent efforts to adjust or amend this agreement to comply with any prevailing law, judgment, or regulatory orders. In previous dockets, Staff took the position that negotiated agreements should be considered economically efficient if the services are priced at or above their Long Run Service Incremental Costs (“LRSICs”). Requiring that a service be priced at or above its LRSIC ensures that the service is not being subsidized and complies with the Commission’s pricing policy. All of the services in this agreement are priced at or above their respective LRSICs. Therefore, this agreement should not be considered economically inefficient. I have no reason to conclude that this agreement is contrary to the public interest and nothing in this agreement leads me to the conclusion that the agreement is inequitable, inconsistent with past Commission Orders, or in violation of state or federal law. Therefore, I recommend that the Commission approve the agreement subject to the implementation requirements of the next section. IMPLEMENTATION In order to implement the AMERITECH ILLINOIS-TELICOR agreement, the Commission should require AMERITECH ILLINOIS to, within five (5) days from the date the agreement is approved, modify its tariffs to refer...
Public Interest. 18. Xxxxxxxxx’x conduct described in this Settlement Agreement is contrary to the public interest.
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.