Protective Behaviors Sample Clauses

Protective Behaviors. The Qualtrics dataset reveals some counterintuitive results in that, among all respondents, healthcare workers actually engage in significantly fewer protective behaviors compared to non-healthcare workers (e.g., Table 3). However, examining the effects of partisanship, I find exactly what I would expect – Republicans and Independents are significantly less likely than Democrats to take disease-mitigating steps when looking at all respondents (e.g., Table 4). Republicans engage in, on average, 0.154 fewer protective behaviors than Democrats and Independents take 0.238 fewer protective measures compared to Democrats. This is consistent with the difference in means insofar as Democrats average number of protective behaviors is 6.259 while Republicans is 6.043 and Independents is 5.969. Looking at healthcare workers alone, there is no significant effect of partisanship on protective behaviors (e.g., Table 8). Republicans and Independents still indicate engaging in fewer disease-mitigating behaviors compared to Democrats, but the difference is not statistically meaningful. Examining only non-healthcare workers, however, I find that the partisan divide is even more pronounced in some ways than it is in the general population (e.g., Table 9). On average, protective behavior scores are 0.152 points lower for Republicans and 0.249 points lower for Independents compared to Democrats. Knowledge about COVID-19 Among all respondents, contrary to what I would expect, healthcare worker status has an insignificant impact on correct knowledge about COVID-19 (e.g., Table 3). However, examining the effects of partisanship, it is clear that Republicans are significantly less likely than Democrats to answer questions about coronavirus correctly when looking at all respondents (e.g., Table 4). Republicans answer, on average, 0.145 fewer questions correctly than Democrats, which makes sense when examining mean COVID-19 knowledge scores by party with average correct answers being 11.984 for Republicans and 12.243 for Democrats. Looking at healthcare workers alone, there is no significant effect of partisanship on correct COVID-19 knowledge (e.g., Table 8). Independents still have lower scores compared to Democrats, but the difference is not statistically meaningful. Examining only non-healthcare workers, however, I find that the partisan divide is still significantly pronounced with COVID-19 knowledge scores being 0.171 points lower for Republicans compared to Democrats (e.g., T...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Protective Behaviors. Among all respondents, individuals with personal experience engage in significantly more protective behaviors than those without personal experience (e.g., Table 16). Individuals who had coronavirus symptoms in the past seven days, tested positive for the virus, or live with someone who tested positive engage in, on average, 0.112 more disease-mitigating behaviors compared to those without personal experience. This is consistent with the difference in means insofar as individuals with personal experience have an average protective behaviors score of 4.370 while those without experience have an average score of 4.292. Examining the effects of partisanship on protective behaviors, I find that Republicans and Independents engage in significantly fewer protective behaviors than Democrats when looking at all respondents. Republicans’ take, on average, 0.543 fewer disease-mitigating actions those of Democrats and Independents engage in 0.188 fewer protective behaviors compared to Democrats. This makes sense when examining the mean disease-mitigating behaviors scores by party with an average number of protective behaviors being 4.024 for Republicans, 4.274 for Independents, and 4.621 for Democrats. Moreover, looking only at Republicans, having personal experience significantly increases protective behavior scores by 0.289 points (e.g., Table 18). Examining those with personal experience alone, I find that the partisan divide remains significantly pronounced with Republicans engaging in, on average, 0.363 fewer protective behaviors and Independents taking 0.272 fewer disease-mitigating steps compared to Democrats; however, the divide is diminished compared to the overall population (e.g., Table 17). Results for the other, more imperfect, measure of protective behaviors (i.e., number of places visited in the past 24 hours) reveal similar findings about the effects of partisanship. Republicans and Independents engage in significantly fewer disease-mitigating behaviors compared to Democrats when looking at all respondents. Republicans take, on average, 1.093 fewer protective actions than Democrats and Independents engage in 0.644 fewer disease- mitigating behaviors compared to Democrats. This is consistent with the difference in means insofar as Republicans’ average protective behaviors score is 8.917 while Independents’ mean score is 9.407 and Democrats’ is 10.012. Looking at those with personal experience, I find that the partisan divide nearly disappears. Republic...
Protective Behaviors. (5 1) Contraceptives

Related to Protective Behaviors

  • Protective Footwear Effective January 1, 2002, and on that date for each subsequent calendar year, the Hospital will provide $80 per calendar year to each full-time and $45 per calendar year to each regular part-time employee who is required by the Hospital to wear safety footwear during the course of his duties. The employees who will be required to wear safety footwear will be negotiated locally and set out in the Local Provisions Appendix. Note: The existing central language designating the classifications of employees which are deemed to require appropriate safety footwear shall be transferred to the local appendix.

  • Protective Clothing 14.1 The Employer will be required to provide the following protective equipment (SAA approved) for use, when necessary, by employees during the performance of their required duties:

  • ANTI-COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR Contractor will not collude, in any manner, or engage in any practice which may restrict or eliminate competition or otherwise restrain trade.

  • Protective Measures We have implemented and will maintain appropriate technical and organisational measures in relation to the Services taking into account the state of the art, the costs of implementation, and the nature, scope, context and purposes of Processing, as well as the likelihood and severity of risk to the rights and freedoms of data subjects. This includes measures relating to the physical security of Our facilities used to deliver them, measures to control access rights to Our assets and relevant networks, and processes for testing these measures. In accordance with Our obligations under applicable law, We may undertake digital forensic investigations in relation to the use of the Services and Subscriptions. You are responsible for using, and ensuring that your Users use, the controls and advice provided by the Services correctly and consistently.

  • BEHAVIOR AND CONDUCT The Student is responsible for knowing and observing all UCF regulations and procedures regarding behavior and conduct, including the UCF Golden Rule, UCF DHRL publications, and other official UCF publications. UCF DHRL reserves the right to establish or adopt additional rules regarding student conduct, as deemed necessary by UCF DHRL. Newly established or adopted rules will be communicated to the Student as provided in this document. The Student agrees to abide by additional rules and regulations that are established or adopted by UCF DHRL once communicated to the Student.

  • PROFESSIONAL BEHAVIOR A. Teachers are expected to comply with reasonable rules, regulations, and directions adopted by the Board, or its representatives, which are not inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement, provided that a teacher may reasonably refuse to carry out an order which threatens physical safety or well being or is professionally demeaning.

  • WORKPLACE BEHAVIOR 3.1 The University, the Union and employees covered by this Agreement agree that all employees should work in an environment that fosters mutual respect and professionalism. The parties agree that inappropriate behavior in the workplace by or against employees, students, or members of the public does not promote the University’s mission, employee wellbeing, or productivity. All employees are responsible for contributing to such an environment and are expected to treat others with courtesy and respect.

  • Protective Clothing & Equipment While not being part of any issue of protective clothing/equipment, the company shall be required to provide the following protective equipment (SAA approved) for use, when necessary, by employees during the performance of their required duties:

  • Employability Executive acknowledges (i) that Executive has sufficient abilities and talents to be able to obtain, upon the termination of Executive’s employment, comparable employment from another business while fully honoring and complying with the above covenants concerning confidential information and contacts with the Company’s or any of its Affiliates’ customers or employees, and (ii) the importance to the Company and its Affiliates of the above covenants. Accordingly, for a period of one (1) year following the termination of Executive’s employment with the Company and upon the Company’s reasonable request of Executive, Executive shall advise the Company of the identity of Executive’s new employer and shall provide a general description, in reasonable detail, of Executive’s new duties and responsibilities sufficient to inform the Company of its need to request a court order to enforce the above covenants.

  • Behaviour No obscene or insulting language or disorderly behaviour shall be permitted. This includes any form of entertainment that may be considered lewd or inappropriate for a public place or that may offend or cause embarrassment to others.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.