Preliminary Review Sample Clauses

Preliminary Review. Prior to issuing a disciplinary action of unpaid suspension, demotion, or discharge, the supervisor will make a recommendation to his/her supervisor regarding proposed discipline. That supervisor will then schedule a meeting with the employee prior to making a final determination of the proposed discipline. The employee shall have the opportunity to have union representation present and be provided the opportunity to speak on his/her behalf regarding the proposed action. If the employee is unable to meet with the supervisor, the employee will be given the opportunity to respond in writing.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Preliminary Review. Within five business days of receipt of the request from the Director, the Plan will complete a preliminary review of your request to determine whether: • You were a covered person at the time health care service was re­ quested or provided; • The service that is the subject of the Adverse Determination or the Fi­ nal Adverse Determination is a Covered Service under this benefit program, but the Plan has determined that the health care service is not covered; • You have exhausted the Plan's internal appeal process, unless you are not required to exhaust the Plan's internal appeal process pursuant to the Illinois Health Carrier External Review Act; and • You have provided all the information and forms required to process an external review. For appeals relating to a determination based on treatment being experi­ mental or investigational, the Plan will complete a preliminary review to determine whether the requested service or treatment that is the subject of the Adverse Determination or Final Adverse Determination is a Covered Service, except for the Plan's determination that the service or treatment is experimental or investigational for a particular medical condition and is not explicitly listed as an excluded benefit. In addition, your health care provider has certified that one of the following situations is applicable: • Standard health care services or treatments have not been effective in improving your condition; • Standard health care services or treatments are not medically ap­ propriate for you; or • There is no available standard health care services or treatment cov­ ered by the Plan that is more beneficial than the recommended or requested service or treatment. • In addition, a) your health care provider has certified in writing that the health care service or treatment is likely to be more beneficial to you, in the opinion of your health care provider, than any available standard health care services or treatments; or b) your health care provider, who is a licensed, board certified or board eligible physician qualified to practice in the area of medicine appropriate to treat your condition has certified in writing that scientifically valid studies using accepted pro­ tocols demonstrate that the health care service or treatment requested is likely to be more beneficial to you than any available standard health care services or treatments.
Preliminary Review. The Plan Administrator will perform a preliminary review of the domestic relations order to determine if it is a QDRO. If this preliminary review indicates the order is deficient in some manner, the Plan Administrator will allow the parties to attempt to correct any deficiency before issuing a final decision on the domestic relations order. The ability to correct is limited to a reasonable period of time.
Preliminary Review. For this paragraph’s purposes only, “Publication” does not mean a disclosure that reasonably has excluded detailed experimental results.
Preliminary Review. Preliminary review of the proposed development and preliminary layout of the required water main extension in accordance with the Water District’s Water Comprehensive Plan.
Preliminary Review. When a report or formal complaint alleging possible misconduct in research and scholarly activities is received by the Vice Chancellor for Research and Engagement, he or she will appoint a designee(s) to conduct a PRELIMINARY REVIEW. Normally the designee will be the Xxxx of the relevant college, but in situations of real, apparent, or potential conflict of interest, some other appropriate person(s) of comparable rank without any such conflict shall be appointed. The designee will conduct a PRELIMINARY REVIEW of the information or circumstances giving rise to a suspicion of misconduct in research and scholarly activities. The designee is directed to inform the person(s) alleged to have committed the act(s) of misconduct (the respondent) and, if the respondent(s) so desire, receive account(s) of the situation under inquiry from their/his/her point of view. The designee may consult informally, on a confidential basis, with the chairperson of the department involved and with others in the university community in carrying out the PRELIMINARY REVIEW. Immediate action should be taken to protect any data or other materials involved, including obtaining secure possession of such materials. The purpose of the PRELIMINARY REVIEW is to ascertain whether or not there is sufficient substance to the allegation of misconduct to proceed with additional investigation. The PRELIMINARY REVIEW should be completed by the designee within seven days of the receipt of the allegation or other information. Any need for additional time must be documented in writing. The designee shall make a written recommendation to the Vice Chancellor for Research and Engagement with copies to the respondent, and to any complainant. The recommendation shall specify either that the allegation or other information is without substance and the matter should be closed or that there is sufficient substance to the claims of misconduct to warrant further review. The respondent(s) may comment in writing on the written recommendation, which comment will be attached and subsequently included thereafter with the written recommendation. The Vice Chancellor for Research and Engagement shall review the recommendation of the PRELIMINARY REVIEW designee and decide whether to proceed to the next level of review. If the decision is consistent with the PRELIMINARY REVIEW recommendation and is to proceed, the Vice Chancellor for Research and Engagement shall bring the matter before the University Research and Scholar...
Preliminary Review. To support preliminary project reviews, our team will employ the use of GIS-based “desktop” constraints analysis prior to engaging in field reconnaissance. This includes review of publicly available geospatial datasets, aerial photographs, and regulatory database reviews to identify potential environmental constraints within a project area including (but not limited to): ✓ Water Resources ✓ Floodplains ✓ Wildlife HabitatProtected Lands (parks, wildlife refuges, state-owned land, federal lands, etc.) ✓ Cultural/Historic ResourcesHazardous MaterialsEnvironmental Justice Issues ✓ Prime/Unique FarmlandLand Use ✓ Geology After identifying potential environmental constraints via “desktop” review, our MPACT team will mobilize experienced environmental field staff to conduct preliminary site reconnaissance, which includes a visual inspection of the site to confirm the presence/absence of identified environmental constraints, take site photographs, and gather other information necessary to support recommendations for the level of environmental review pursuant to 24 CFR Part 58 (CENST, CEST, EA, or EIS). This information will be compiled into a technical memorandum summarizing identified constraints, required level of environmental review, and identification of other environmental permits and/or reviews that may be required to complete the proposed project. Our team has the added value of including personnel who have led Federal and State-level HUD Part 58 Environmental compliance activities. The MPACT team has prepared Tiering Plans, reviewed Site Specific (Tier II) Checklists, determined level of environmental reviews for housing and infrastructure activities, assisted system of record developers with building and modifying environmental workflows, provided Environmental training, for housing programs, buyout and acquisition, and infrastructure repair programs. Our team’s professional experience has allowed for us to coordinate between multiple federal agencies including, but not limited to, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (USACE), the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). MPACT’s team of professionals have experience in identifying the appropriate levels of environmental reviews based on proposed project descriptions. The project scopes can vary and range from minor rehabilitation to new constr...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Preliminary Review for reappointment begins at the start of the first spring semester following the completion of a minimum five (5) full, contiguous semesters at the current appointed rank.
Preliminary Review. A preliminary review occurs prior to Pre-consultation. Its purpose is to gather information and is typically part of a developer’s due diligence. Preliminary discussions about a potential development application benefit the applicant by supplying early information about the land, process and possible issues. An important part of a preliminary review is providing direction on the Pre-Consultation Process. In particular, the applicant needs to understand what information is required by the parties prior to pre-consultation and any fees.
Preliminary Review. Once a complete application is submitted the ENGINEER will review application submittals for conformance with the CITY’s codes, master plans, Public Works Design and Construction Standards, and engineering and construction practices. The ENGINEER may obtain input from other agencies and coordinate as needed. Consolidating comments received from staff, the ENGINEER will identify conflicting engineering issues and prepare engineering summaries of the proposal, findings against the requirements of the code and standards, and provide recommended conditions of approval for Planning staff reports. The ENGINEER will also attend public hearings.
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.