Common use of Police Department Clause in Contracts

Police Department. Xxxxx Xx Xx Xxxxxxxxx Captain Milwaukee (WI) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxx Inspector of Police Minneapolis (MN) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Commander Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Chief of Police Xxxxxxxxxx County (MD) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxx Director Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Assistant Chief of Police Motorola Solutions, Inc. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Vice President Xxxxx Xxxxxx Corporate Vice President Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Business Development Manager MPH Industries Inc. Xxxxx Xxxx Senior Training Officer National Institute of Justice U.S. Department of Justice Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Social Science Analyst Xxxxxxx Xxxx Division Director National Law Enforcement Museum Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Associate Curator National Press Photographers Association Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx General Counsel New Haven (CT) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Assistant Chief of Police New Orleans (LA) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxxx Superintendent of Police New South Wales (AUS) Police Force Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Chief Superintendent New York City Police Department Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx Inspector Implementing a Body-Worn Camera Program: Recommendations and Lessons Learned Newark (NJ) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Chief of Police Xxxxxx XxXxxx Director Xxxxxxx XxxXxxx Lieutenant Xxxxx X’Xxxx Lieutenant Norfolk (VA) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Captain Xxxxx Xxxxx Lieutenant Northern California Regional Intelligence Center Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Deputy Director Oakland (CA) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxx Chief of Police Office of Community Oriented Policing Services U.S. Department of Justice Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Program Specialist Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Supervisory Policy Analyst Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Acting Director Xxxx Xxxxxxx Social Science Analyst Xxxx Xxxxxx Acting Chief of Staff Xxxxx XxXxxxxxxx Senior Social Science Analyst Xxxxxxxxx XxXxxx Senior Policy Analyst Xxxxxx Xxxxx Senior Program Specialist Xxxx Xxxxx Program Specialist Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Intergovernmental Affairs Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Policy Advisor Panasonic Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx Group Manager Philadelphia (PA) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Police Commissioner Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Inspector Phoenix (AZ) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxx Assistant Chief of Police Police and Public Safety Consultant Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Consultant Police Foundation Xxx Xxxxxxxxx President Xxx Xxxxxx Assistant to the President for Communications and Policy Poulsbo (WA) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Chief of Police Prince Xxxxxx’s County (MD) Police Department Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Corporal Mark Person Major Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx XXX Deputy Chief of Police Xxxxxx Xxxxx Deputy Chief of Police 74 Appendixes Prince Xxxxxxx County (VA) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Chief of Police (Retired) Xxxxx Xxxxx Lieutenant Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Senior Administrative Manager Xxxxxx County (MN) Sheriff’s Office Xxxxxx Xxxxx Director of Planning and Policy Analysis Rialto (CA) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Chief of Police Richmond (CA) Police Department Xxxxxx Xxxxx Deputy Chief of Police Richmond (VA) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxx Major Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Major Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Captain Riverside (CA) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxxx Lieutenant Roanoke (VA) County Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxx Assistant Chief of Police Xxxxxxxx & Yu LLC Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Principal Royal Canadian Mounted Police X. Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx Director of Operational Policy and Compliance San Diego County District Attorney, Bureau of Investigations Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Chief Investigator San Leandro (CA) Police Department Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Chief of Police Seattle (WA) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxxx Detective Spokane (WA) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Commander Xxxxx Xxxxx Assistant Chief of Police Xxx Xxxxxxxxx Deputy Director Springfield (MO) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Chief of Police Tampa (FL) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Captain TASER International Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Chief Operating Officer Tennessee Association of Chiefs of Police Xxxxx XxXxxx Xxxxxx Executive Director and CEO Thomasville (NC) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxx Sergeant Topeka (KS) Police Department Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Chief of Police Toronto (ON) Police Service Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Deputy Chief of Police Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Unit Commander Xxxxx Xxxxx Deputy Chief of Police Implementing a Body-Worn Camera Program: Recommendations and Lessons Learned Tucson (AZ) Police Department Xxxxxx Xxxxx Deputy Chief of Police Xxx Xxxxx Captain UCLA Xxxxxxxx School of Management Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx University of California, San Diego Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxx Chief of Police Xxxxx Xxxx Captain University of South Florida Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Associate Professor U.S. Capitol Police Department Xxx Xxxx Chief of Police Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Inspector U.S. State Department Xxxx Xxxxx Public Diplomacy Officer VIEVU Xxxxxx Xxxxxx President Virginia Beach Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Chief of Police Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx PTO Coordinator Xxxx Xxxxx Lieutenant West Palm Beach (FL) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Captain Xxxxx Xxxxxx Captain Yakima (WA) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx Captain 76 About PERF‌ The Police Executive Research Forum (PERF) is an independent research organization that focuses on critical issues in policing. Since its founding in 1976, PERF has identified best practices on fundamental issues such as reducing police use of force, developing community policing and problem-oriented policing, using technologies to deliver police services to the community, and evaluating crime reduction strategies. PERF strives to advance professionalism in policing and to improve the delivery of police services through the exercise of strong national leadership, public debate of police and criminal justice issues, and research and policy development. In addition to conducting research and publishing reports on our findings, PERF conducts management studies of individual law enforcement agencies, educates hundreds of police officials each year in a three-week executive development program, and provides executive search services to governments that wish to conduct national searches for their next police chief. All of PERF’s work benefits from PERF’s status as a membership organization of police officials, academics, federal government leaders, and others with an interest in policing and criminal justice. All PERF members must have a four-year college degree and must subscribe to a set of founding principles, emphasizing the importance of research and public debate in policing, adherence to the Constitution and the highest standards of ethics and integrity, and accountability to the communities that police agencies serve. XXXX is governed by a member-elected president and board of directors and a board-appointed executive director. A staff of approximately 30 full-time professionals is based in Washington, D.C. To learn more, visit PERF online at xxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx. 77 About the COPS Office The Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office) is the component of the U.S. Department of Justice responsible for advancing the practice of community policing by the nation’s state, local, territory, and tribal law enforcement agencies through information and grant resources. Community policing is a philosophy that promotes organizational strategies that support the systematic use of partnerships and problem-solving techniques, to proactively address the immediate conditions that give rise to public safety issues such as crime, social disorder, and fear of crime. Rather than simply responding to crimes once they have been committed, community policing concentrates on preventing crime and eliminating the atmosphere of fear it creates. Earning the trust of the community and making those individuals stakeholders in their own safety enables law enforcement to better understand and address both the needs of the community and the factors that contribute to crime. The COPS Office awards grants to state, local, territory, and tribal law enforcement agencies to hire and train community policing professionals, acquire and deploy cutting-edge crime fighting technologies, and develop and test innovative policing strategies. COPS Office funding also provides training and technical assistance to community members and local government leaders and all levels of law enforcement. The COPS Office has produced and compiled a broad range of information resources that can help law enforcement better address specific crime and operational issues, and help community leaders better understand how to work cooperatively with their law enforcement agency to reduce crime. • Since 1994, the COPS Office has invested more than $14 billion to add community policing officers to the nation’s streets, enhance crime fighting technology, support crime prevention initiatives, and provide training and technical assistance to help advance community policing. • To date, the COPS Office has funded approximately 125,000 additional officers to more than 13,000 of the nation’s 18,000 law enforcement agencies across the country in small and large jurisdictions alike. • Nearly 700,000 law enforcement personnel, community members, and government leaders have been trained through COPS Office-funded training organizations. • To date, the COPS Office has distributed more than 8.57 million topic-specific publications, training curricula, white papers, and resource CDs. COPS Office resources, covering a wide breadth of community policing topics—from school and campus safety to gang violence—are available, at no cost, through its online Resource Center at xxx.xxxx.xxxxx.xxx. This easy-to-navigate website is also the grant application portal, providing access to online application forms. In recent years, many law enforcement agencies have been deploying small video cameras worn by officers to record encounters with the public; investigate officer-involved incidents; produce evidence; and strengthen agency performance, accountability, and transparency. While body-worn cameras have the potential to improve police services, they also raise issues involving privacy, police-community relationships, procedural justice, and technical and cost questions, all of which agencies should examine as they consider this technology. The Police Executive Research Forum, with support from the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, conducted research in 2013 on the use of body-worn cameras. This research included interviews with police executives, a review of agencies’ policies, and a national conference at which 200 police executives and other experts discussed their experiences with body-worn cameras. This publication describes the findings of this research, explores the issues surrounding body-worn cameras, and offers policy recommendations for law enforcement agencies. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services 000 X Xxxxxx XX Washington, DC 20530 To obtain details on COPS Office programs, call the COPS Office Response Center at 000-000-0000. Visit the COPS Office online at xxx.xxxx.xxxxx.xxx. Police Executive Research Forum 0000 Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx XX Xxxxx 000 Washington, DC 20036 000-000-0000 Visit PERF online at xxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.

Police Department. Xxxxx Xx Xx Xxxxxxxxx Captain Milwaukee (WI) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxx Inspector of Police Minneapolis (MN) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Commander Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Chief of Police Xxxxxxxxxx County (MD) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxx Director Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Assistant Chief of Police Motorola Solutions, Inc. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Vice President Xxxxx Xxxxxx Corporate Vice President Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Business Development Manager MPH Industries Inc. Xxxxx Xxxx Senior Training Officer National Institute of Justice U.S. Department of Justice Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Social Science Analyst Xxxxxxx Xxxx Division Director National Law Enforcement Museum Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Associate Curator National Press Photographers Association Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx General Counsel New Haven (CT) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Assistant Chief of Police New Orleans (LA) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxxx Superintendent of Police New South Wales (AUS) Police Force Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Chief Superintendent New York City Police Department Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx Inspector Implementing a Body-Worn Camera Program: Recommendations and Lessons Learned Newark (NJ) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Chief of Police Xxxxxx XxXxxx Director Xxxxxxx XxxXxxx Lieutenant Xxxxx X’Xxxx Lieutenant Norfolk (VA) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Captain Xxxxx Xxxxx Lieutenant Northern California Regional Intelligence Center Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Deputy Director Oakland (CA) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxx Chief of Police Office of Community Oriented Policing Services U.S. Department of Justice Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Program Specialist Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Supervisory Policy Analyst Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Acting Director Xxxx Xxxxxxx Social Science Analyst Xxxx Xxxxxx Acting Chief of Staff Xxxxx XxXxxxxxxx Senior Social Science Analyst Xxxxxxxxx XxXxxx Senior Policy Analyst Xxxxxx Xxxxx Senior Program Specialist Xxxx Xxxxx Program Specialist Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Intergovernmental Affairs Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Policy Advisor Panasonic Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx Group Manager Philadelphia (PA) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Police Commissioner Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Inspector Phoenix (AZ) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxx Assistant Chief of Police Police and Public Safety Consultant Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Consultant Police Foundation Xxx Xxxxxxxxx President Xxx Xxxxxx Assistant to the President for Communications and Policy Poulsbo (WA) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Chief of Police Prince Xxxxxx’s County (MD) Police Department Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Corporal Mark Person Major Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx XXX Deputy Chief of Police Xxxxxx Xxxxx Deputy Chief of Police 74 Appendixes Prince Xxxxxxx County (VA) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Chief of Police (Retired) Xxxxx Xxxxx Lieutenant Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Senior Administrative Manager Xxxxxx County (MN) Sheriff’s Office Xxxxxx Xxxxx Director of Planning and Policy Analysis Rialto (CA) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Chief of Police Richmond (CA) Police Department Xxxxxx Xxxxx Deputy Chief of Police Richmond (VA) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxx Major Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Major Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Captain Riverside (CA) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxxx Lieutenant Roanoke (VA) County Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxx Assistant Chief of Police Xxxxxxxx & Yu LLC Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Principal Royal Canadian Mounted Police X. Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx Director of Operational Policy and Compliance San Diego County District Attorney, Bureau of Investigations Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Chief Investigator San Leandro (CA) Police Department Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Chief of Police Seattle (WA) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxxx Detective Spokane (WA) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Commander Xxxxx Xxxxx Assistant Chief of Police Xxx Xxxxxxxxx Deputy Director Springfield (MO) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Chief of Police Tampa (FL) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Captain TASER International Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Chief Operating Officer Tennessee Association of Chiefs of Police Xxxxx XxXxxx Xxxxxx Executive Director and CEO Thomasville (NC) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxx Sergeant Topeka (KS) Police Department Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Chief of Police Toronto (ON) Police Service Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Deputy Chief of Police Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Unit Commander Xxxxx Xxxxx Deputy Chief of Police Implementing a Body-Worn Camera Program: Recommendations and Lessons Learned Tucson (AZ) Police Department Xxxxxx Xxxxx Deputy Chief of Police Xxx Xxxxx Captain UCLA Xxxxxxxx School of Management Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx University of California, San Diego Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxx Chief of Police Xxxxx Xxxx Captain University of South Florida Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Associate Professor U.S. Capitol Police Department Xxx Xxxx Chief of Police Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Inspector U.S. State Department Xxxx Xxxxx Public Diplomacy Officer VIEVU Xxxxxx Xxxxxx President Virginia Beach Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Chief of Police Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx PTO Coordinator Xxxx Xxxxx Lieutenant West Palm Beach (FL) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Captain Xxxxx Xxxxxx Captain Yakima (WA) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx Captain 76 About PERF‌ The Police Executive Research Forum (PERF) is an independent research organization that focuses on critical issues in policing. Since its founding in 1976, PERF has identified best practices on fundamental issues such as reducing police use of force, developing community policing and problem-oriented policing, using technologies to deliver police services to the community, and evaluating crime reduction strategies. PERF strives to advance professionalism in policing and to improve the delivery of police services through the exercise of strong national leadership, public debate of police and criminal justice issues, and research and policy development. In addition to conducting research and publishing reports on our findings, PERF conducts management studies of individual law enforcement agencies, educates hundreds of police officials each year in a three-week executive development program, and provides executive search services to governments that wish to conduct national searches for their next police chief. All of PERF’s work benefits from PERF’s status as a membership organization of police officials, academics, federal government leaders, and others with an interest in policing and criminal justice. All PERF members must have a four-year college degree and must subscribe to a set of founding principles, emphasizing the importance of research and public debate in policing, adherence to the Constitution and the highest standards of ethics and integrity, and accountability to the communities that police agencies serve. XXXX is governed by a member-elected president and board of directors and a board-appointed executive director. A staff of approximately 30 full-time professionals is based in Washington, D.C. To learn more, visit PERF online at xxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx. 77 About the COPS Office The Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office) is the component of the U.S. Department of Justice responsible for advancing the practice of community policing by the nation’s state, local, territory, and tribal law enforcement agencies through information and grant resources. Community policing is a philosophy that promotes organizational strategies that support the systematic use of partnerships and problem-solving techniques, to proactively address the immediate conditions that give rise to public safety issues such as crime, social disorder, and fear of crime. Rather than simply responding to crimes once they have been committed, community policing concentrates on preventing crime and eliminating the atmosphere of fear it creates. Earning the trust of the community and making those individuals stakeholders in their own safety enables law enforcement to better understand and address both the needs of the community and the factors that contribute to crime. The COPS Office awards grants to state, local, territory, and tribal law enforcement agencies to hire and train community policing professionals, acquire and deploy cutting-edge crime fighting technologies, and develop and test innovative policing strategies. COPS Office funding also provides training and technical assistance to community members and local government leaders and all levels of law enforcement. The COPS Office has produced and compiled a broad range of information resources that can help law enforcement better address specific crime and operational issues, and help community leaders better understand how to work cooperatively with their law enforcement agency to reduce crime. • r Since 1994, the COPS Office has invested more than $14 billion to add community policing officers to the nation’s streets, enhance crime fighting technology, support crime prevention initiatives, and provide training and technical assistance to help advance community policing. • r To date, the COPS Office has funded approximately 125,000 additional officers to more than 13,000 of the nation’s 18,000 law enforcement agencies across the country in small and large jurisdictions alike. • r Nearly 700,000 law enforcement personnel, community members, and government leaders have been trained through COPS Office-funded training organizations. • r To date, the COPS Office has distributed more than 8.57 million topic-specific publications, training curricula, white papers, and resource CDs. COPS Office resources, covering a wide breadth of community policing topics—from school and campus safety to gang violence—are available, at no cost, through its online Resource Center at xxx.xxxx.xxxxx.xxx. This easy-to-navigate website is also the grant application portal, providing access to online application forms. In recent years, many law enforcement agencies have been deploying small video cameras worn by officers to record encounters with the public; investigate officer-involved incidents; produce evidence; and strengthen agency performance, accountability, and transparency. While body-worn cameras have the potential to improve police services, they also raise issues involving privacy, police-community relationships, procedural justice, and technical and cost questions, all of which agencies should examine as they consider this technology. The Police Executive Research Forum, with support from the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, conducted research in 2013 on the use of body-worn cameras. This research included interviews with police executives, a review of agencies’ policies, and a national conference at which 200 police executives and other experts discussed their experiences with body-worn cameras. This publication describes the findings of this research, explores the issues surrounding body-worn cameras, and offers policy recommendations for law enforcement agencies. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services 000 X Xxxxxx XX Washington, DC 20530 To obtain details on COPS Office programs, call the COPS Office Response Center at 000-000-0000. Visit the COPS Office online at xxx.xxxx.xxxxx.xxx. Police Executive Research Forum 0000 Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx XX Xxxxx 000 Washington, DC 20036 000-000-0000 Visit PERF online at xxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.

Police Department. Xxxxx Xx Xx Xxxxxxxxx Captain Milwaukee (WI) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxx Inspector of Police Minneapolis (MN) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Commander Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Chief of Police Xxxxxxxxxx County (MD) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxx Director Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Assistant Chief of Police Motorola Solutions, Inc. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Vice President Xxxxx Xxxxxx Corporate Vice President Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Business Development Manager MPH Industries Inc. Xxxxx Xxxx Senior Training Officer National Institute of Justice U.S. Department of Justice Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Social Science Analyst Xxxxxxx Xxxx Division Director National Law Enforcement Museum Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Associate Curator National Press Photographers Association Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx General Counsel New Haven (CT) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Assistant Chief of Police New Orleans (LA) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxxx Superintendent of Police New South Wales (AUS) Police Force Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Chief Superintendent New York City Police Department Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx Inspector Implementing a Body-Worn Camera Program: Recommendations and Lessons Learned Newark (NJ) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Chief of Police Xxxxxx XxXxxx Director Xxxxxxx XxxXxxx Lieutenant Xxxxx X’Xxxx Lieutenant Norfolk (VA) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Captain Xxxxx Xxxxx Lieutenant Northern California Regional Intelligence Center Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Deputy Director Oakland (CA) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxx Chief of Police Office of Community Oriented Policing Services U.S. Department of Justice Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Program Specialist Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Supervisory Policy Analyst Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Acting Director Xxxx Xxxxxxx Social Science Analyst Xxxx Xxxxxx Acting Chief of Staff Xxxxx XxXxxxxxxx Senior Social Science Analyst Xxxxxxxxx XxXxxx Senior Policy Analyst Xxxxxx Xxxxx Senior Program Specialist Xxxx Xxxxx Program Specialist Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Intergovernmental Affairs Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Policy Advisor Panasonic Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx Group Manager Philadelphia (PA) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Police Commissioner Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Inspector Phoenix (AZ) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxx Assistant Chief of Police Police and Public Safety Consultant Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Consultant Police Foundation Xxx Xxxxxxxxx President Xxx Xxxxxx Assistant to the President for Communications and Policy Poulsbo (WA) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Chief of Police Prince Xxxxxx’s County (MD) Police Department Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Corporal Mark Person Major Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx XXX Deputy Chief of Police Xxxxxx Xxxxx Deputy Chief of Police 74 Appendixes Prince Xxxxxxx County (VA) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Chief of Police (Retired) Xxxxx Xxxxx Lieutenant Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Senior Administrative Manager Xxxxxx County (MN) SheriffXxxxxX’s Office Xxxxxx Xxxxx Director of Planning and Policy Analysis Rialto (CA) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Chief of Police Richmond (CA) Police Department Xxxxxx Xxxxx Deputy Chief of Police Richmond (VA) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxx Major Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Major Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Captain Riverside (CA) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxxx Lieutenant Roanoke (VA) County Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxx Assistant Chief of Police Xxxxxxxx & Yu LLC Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Principal Royal Canadian Mounted Police X. Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx Director of Operational Policy and Compliance San Diego County District Attorney, Bureau of Investigations Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Chief Investigator San Leandro (CA) Police Department Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Chief of Police Seattle (WA) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxxx Detective Spokane (WA) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Commander Xxxxx Xxxxx Assistant Chief of Police Xxx Xxxxxxxxx Deputy Director Springfield (MO) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Chief of Police Tampa (FL) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Captain TASER International Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Chief Operating Officer Tennessee Association of Chiefs of Police Xxxxx XxXxxx Xxxxxx Executive Director and CEO Thomasville (NC) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxx Sergeant Topeka (KS) Police Department Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Chief of Police Toronto (ON) Police Service Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Deputy Chief of Police Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Unit Commander Xxxxx Xxxxx Deputy Chief of Police Implementing a Body-Worn Camera Program: Recommendations and Lessons Learned Tucson (AZ) Police Department Xxxxxx Xxxxx Deputy Chief of Police Xxx Xxxxx Captain UCLA Xxxxxxxx School of Management Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx University of California, San Diego Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxx Chief of Police Xxxxx Xxxx Captain University of South Florida Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Associate Professor U.S. Capitol Police Department Xxx Xxxx Chief of Police Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Inspector U.S. State Department Xxxx Xxxxx Public Diplomacy Officer VIEVU Xxxxxx Xxxxxx President Virginia Beach Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Chief of Police Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx PTO Coordinator Xxxx Xxxxx Lieutenant West Palm Beach (FL) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Captain Xxxxx Xxxxxx Captain Yakima (WA) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx Captain 76 About PERF‌ The Police Executive Research Forum (PERF) is an independent research organization that focuses on critical issues in policing. Since its founding in 19761e76, PERF has identified best practices on fundamental issues such as reducing police use of force, developing community policing and problem-oriented policing, using technologies to deliver police services to the community, and evaluating crime reduction strategies. PERF strives to advance professionalism in policing and to improve the delivery of police services through the exercise of strong national leadership, public debate of police and criminal justice issues, and research and policy development. In addition to conducting research and publishing reports on our findings, PERF conducts management studies of individual law enforcement agencies, educates hundreds of police officials each year in a three-week executive development program, and provides executive search services to governments that wish to conduct national searches for their next police chief. All of PERF’s work benefits from PERF’s status as a membership organization of police officials, academics, federal government leaders, and others with an interest in policing and criminal justice. All PERF members must have a four-year college degree and must subscribe to a set of founding principles, emphasizing the importance of research and public debate in policing, adherence to the Constitution and the highest standards of ethics and integrity, and accountability to the communities that police agencies serve. XXXX is governed by a member-elected president and board of directors and a board-appointed executive director. A staff of approximately 30 full-time professionals is based in Washington, D.C. To learn more, visit PERF online at xxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx. 77 About the COPS Office The Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office) is the component of the U.S. Department of Justice responsible for advancing the practice of community policing by the nation’s state, local, territory, and tribal law enforcement agencies through information and grant resources. Community policing is a philosophy that promotes organizational strategies that support the systematic use of partnerships and problem-solving techniques, to proactively address the immediate conditions that give rise to public safety issues such as crime, social disorder, and fear of crime. Rather than simply responding to crimes once they have been committed, community policing concentrates on preventing crime and eliminating the atmosphere of fear it creates. Earning the trust of the community and making those individuals stakeholders in their own safety enables law enforcement to better understand and address both the needs of the community and the factors that contribute to crime. The COPS Office awards grants to state, local, territory, and tribal law enforcement agencies to hire and train community policing professionals, acquire and deploy cutting-edge crime fighting technologies, and develop and test innovative policing strategies. COPS Office funding also provides training and technical assistance to community members and local government leaders and all levels of law enforcement. The COPS Office has produced and compiled a broad range of information resources that can help law enforcement better address specific crime and operational issues, and help community leaders better understand how to work cooperatively with their law enforcement agency to reduce crime. • r Since 19941ee4, the COPS Office has invested more than $14 billion to add community policing officers to the nation’s streets, enhance crime fighting technology, support crime prevention initiatives, and provide training and technical assistance to help advance community policing. • r To date, the COPS Office has funded approximately 125,000 additional officers to more than 13,000 of the nation’s 18,000 law enforcement agencies across the country in small and large jurisdictions alike. • r Nearly 700,000 law enforcement personnel, community members, and government leaders have been trained through COPS Office-funded training organizations. • r To date, the COPS Office has distributed more than 8.57 million topic-specific publications, training curricula, white papers, and resource CDs. COPS Office resources, covering a wide breadth of community policing topics—from school and campus safety to gang violence—are available, at no cost, through its online Resource Center at xxx.xxxx.xxxxx.xxx. This easy-to-navigate website is also the grant application portal, providing access to online application forms. In recent years, many law enforcement agencies have been deploying small video cameras worn by officers to record encounters with the public; investigate officer-involved incidents; produce evidence; and strengthen agency performance, accountability, and transparency. While body-worn cameras have the potential to improve police services, they also raise issues involving privacy, police-community relationships, procedural justice, and technical and cost questions, all of which agencies should examine as they consider this technology. The Police Executive Research Forum, with support from the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, conducted research in 2013 on the use of body-worn cameras. This research included interviews with police executives, a review of agencies’ policies, and a national conference at which 200 police executives and other experts discussed their experiences with body-worn cameras. This publication describes the findings of this research, explores the issues surrounding body-worn cameras, and offers policy recommendations for law enforcement agencies. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services 000 X Xxxxxx XX Washington, DC 20530 To obtain details on COPS Office programs, call the COPS Office Response Center at 000-000-0000. Visit the COPS Office online at xxx.xxxx.xxxxx.xxx. Police Executive Research Forum 0000 Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx XX Xxxxx 000 Washington, DC 20036 000-000-0000 Visit PERF online at xxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.

Police Department. Xxxxx Xx Xx Xxxxxxxxx Captain Milwaukee (WI) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxx Inspector of Police Minneapolis (MN) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Commander Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Chief of Police Xxxxxxxxxx County (MD) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxx Director Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Assistant Chief of Police Motorola Solutions, Inc. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Vice President Xxxxx Xxxxxx Corporate Vice President Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Business Development Manager MPH Industries Inc. Xxxxx Xxxx Senior Training Officer National Institute of Justice U.S. Department of Justice Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Social Science Analyst Xxxxxxx Xxxx Division Director National Law Enforcement Museum Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Associate Curator National Press Photographers Association Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx General Counsel New Haven (CT) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Assistant Chief of Police New Orleans (LA) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxxx Superintendent of Police New South Wales (AUS) Police Force Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Chief Superintendent New York City Police Department Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx Inspector Implementing a Body-Worn Camera Program: Recommendations and Lessons Learned Newark (NJ) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Chief of Police Xxxxxx XxXxxx Director Xxxxxxx XxxXxxx Lieutenant Xxxxx X’Xxxx Lieutenant Norfolk (VA) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Captain Xxxxx Xxxxx Lieutenant Northern California Regional Intelligence Center Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Deputy Director Oakland (CA) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxx Chief of Police Office of Community Oriented Policing Services U.S. Department of Justice Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Program Specialist Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Supervisory Policy Analyst Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Acting Director Xxxx Xxxxxxx Social Science Analyst Xxxx Xxxxxx Acting Chief of Staff Xxxxx XxXxxxxxxx Senior Social Science Analyst Xxxxxxxxx XxXxxx Senior Policy Analyst Xxxxxx Xxxxx Senior Program Specialist Xxxx Xxxxx Program Specialist Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Intergovernmental Affairs Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Policy Advisor Panasonic Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx Group Manager Philadelphia (PA) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Police Commissioner Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Inspector Phoenix (AZ) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxx Assistant Chief of Police Police and Public Safety Consultant Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Consultant Police Foundation Xxx Xxxxxxxxx President Xxx Xxxxxx Assistant to the President for Communications and Policy Poulsbo (WA) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Chief of Police Prince Xxxxxx’s County (MD) Police Department Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Corporal Mark Person Major Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx XXX Deputy Chief of Police Xxxxxx Xxxxx Deputy Chief of Police 74 Appendixes Prince Xxxxxxx County (VA) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Chief of Police (Retired) Xxxxx Xxxxx Lieutenant Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Senior Administrative Manager Xxxxxx County (MN) Sheriff’s Office Xxxxxx Xxxxx Director of Planning and Policy Analysis Rialto (CA) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Chief of Police Richmond (CA) Police Department Xxxxxx Xxxxx Deputy Chief of Police Richmond (VA) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxx Major Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Major Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Captain Riverside (CA) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxxx Lieutenant Roanoke (VA) County Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxx Assistant Chief of Police Xxxxxxxx & Yu LLC Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Principal Royal Canadian Mounted Police X. Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx Director of Operational Policy and Compliance San Diego County District Attorney, Bureau of Investigations Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Chief Investigator San Leandro (CA) Police Department Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Chief of Police Seattle (WA) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxxx Detective Spokane (WA) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Commander Xxxxx Xxxxx Assistant Chief of Police Xxx Xxxxxxxxx Deputy Director Springfield (MO) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Chief of Police Tampa (FL) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Captain TASER International Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Chief Operating Officer Tennessee Association of Chiefs of Police Xxxxx XxXxxx Xxxxxx Executive Director and CEO Thomasville (NC) Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxx Sergeant Topeka (KS) Police Department Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Chief of Police Toronto (ON) Police Service Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Deputy Chief of Police Xxxx Xxxxxxxx Unit Commander Xxxxx Xxxxx Deputy Chief of Police Implementing a Body-Worn Camera Program: Recommendations and Lessons Learned Tucson (AZ) Police Department Xxxxxx Xxxxx Deputy Chief of Police Xxx Xxxxx Captain UCLA Xxxxxxxx School of Management Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx University of California, San Diego Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxx Chief of Police Xxxxx Xxxx Captain University of South Florida Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Associate Professor U.S. Capitol Police Department Xxx Xxxx Chief of Police Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Inspector U.S. State Department Xxxx Xxxxx Public Diplomacy Officer VIEVU Xxxxxx Xxxxxx President Virginia Beach Police Department Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Chief of Police Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx PTO Coordinator Xxxx Xxxxx Lieutenant West Palm Beach (FL) Police Department Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Captain Xxxxx Xxxxxx Captain Yakima (WA) Police Department Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx Captain 76 About PERF‌ The Police Executive Research Forum (PERF) is an independent research organization that focuses on critical issues in policingpolicing . Since its founding in 1976, PERF has identified best practices on fundamental issues such as reducing police use of force, developing community policing and problem-oriented policing, using technologies to deliver police services to the community, and evaluating crime reduction strategiesstrategies . PERF strives to advance professionalism in policing and to improve the delivery of police services through the exercise of strong national leadership, public debate of police and criminal justice issues, and research and policy developmentdevelopment . In addition to conducting research and publishing reports on our findings, PERF conducts management studies of individual law enforcement agencies, educates hundreds of police officials each year in a three-week executive development program, and provides executive search services to governments that wish to conduct national searches for their next police chiefchief . All of PERF’s work benefits from PERF’s status as a membership organization of police officials, academics, federal government leaders, and others with an interest in policing and criminal justicejustice . All PERF members must have a four-year college degree and must subscribe to a set of founding principles, emphasizing the importance of research and public debate in policing, adherence to the Constitution and the highest standards of ethics and integrity, and accountability to the communities that police agencies serveserve . XXXX is governed by a member-elected president and board of directors and a board-appointed executive directordirector . A staff of approximately 30 full-time professionals is based in Washington, D.C. D .C . To learn more, visit PERF online at xxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xxxwww .policeforum .org . 77 About the COPS Office The Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS Office) is the component of the U.S. U .S . Department of Justice responsible for advancing the practice of community policing by the nation’s state, local, territory, and tribal law enforcement agencies through information and grant resourcesresources . Community policing is a philosophy that promotes organizational strategies that support the systematic use of partnerships and problem-solving techniques, to proactively address the immediate conditions that give rise to public safety issues such as crime, social disorder, and fear of crimecrime . Rather than simply responding to crimes once they have been committed, community policing concentrates on preventing crime and eliminating the atmosphere of fear it createscreates . Earning the trust of the community and making those individuals stakeholders in their own safety enables law enforcement to better understand and address both the needs of the community and the factors that contribute to crimecrime . The COPS Office awards grants to state, local, territory, and tribal law enforcement agencies to hire and train community policing professionals, acquire and deploy cutting-edge crime fighting technologies, and develop and test innovative policing strategiesstrategies . COPS Office funding also provides training and technical assistance to community members and local government leaders and all levels of law enforcementenforcement . The COPS Office has produced and compiled a broad range of information resources that can help law enforcement better address specific crime and operational issues, and help community leaders better understand how to work cooperatively with their law enforcement agency to reduce crimecrime . • Since 1994, the COPS Office has invested more than $14 billion to add community policing officers to the nation’s streets, enhance crime fighting technology, support crime prevention initiatives, and provide training and technical assistance to help advance community policingpolicing . • To date, the COPS Office has funded approximately 125,000 additional officers to more than 13,000 of the nation’s 18,000 law enforcement agencies across the country in small and large jurisdictions alikealike . • Nearly 700,000 law enforcement personnel, community members, and government leaders have been trained through COPS Office-funded training organizationsorganizations . • To date, the COPS Office has distributed more than 8.57 8 .57 million topic-specific publications, training curricula, white papers, and resource CDsCDs . COPS Office resources, covering a wide breadth of community policing topics—from school and campus safety to gang violence—are available, at no cost, through its online Resource Center at xxx.xxxx.xxxxx.xxxwww .cops .usdoj .gov . This easy-to-navigate website is also the grant application portal, providing access to online application formsforms . In recent years, many law enforcement agencies have been deploying small video cameras worn by officers to record encounters with the public; investigate officer-involved incidents; produce evidence; and strengthen agency performance, accountability, and transparency. While body-worn cameras have the potential to improve police services, they also raise issues involving privacy, police-community relationships, procedural justice, and technical and cost questions, all of which agencies should examine as they consider this technology. The Police Executive Research Forum, with support from the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, conducted research in 2013 on the use of body-worn cameras. This research included interviews with police executives, a review of agencies’ policies, and a national conference at which 200 police executives and other experts discussed their experiences with body-worn cameras. This publication describes the findings of this research, explores the issues surrounding body-worn cameras, and offers policy recommendations for law enforcement agencies. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services 000 X Xxxxxx XX Washington, DC 20530 To obtain details on COPS Office programs, call the COPS Office Response Center at 000-000-0000. Visit the COPS Office online at xxx.xxxx.xxxxx.xxx. Police Executive Research Forum 0000 Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx XX Xxxxx 000 Washington, DC 20036 000-000-0000 Visit PERF online at xxx.xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.