Performance Discussion or Review Sample Clauses

Performance Discussion or Review. The parties recognize that supervisors are required to periodically discuss and review work performance with employees. Such discussions are not investigations, but are opportunities to evaluate and discuss employee performance and, as such, are the prerogative and responsibility of the Employer. An employee shall not have the right to a Union Representative during such performance discussion or review.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Performance Discussion or Review. The parties recognize that supervisors are required to periodically discuss and review work performance with employees. Such discussions are not investigations, but are opportunities to evaluate and discuss employee performance and, as such, are the prerogative and responsibility of the Employer. An employee shall not have the right to an MSEA representative during such performance discussion or review. Performance reviews shall not be considered as punitive/disciplinary action nor as prerequisites to disciplinary action.
Performance Discussion or Review. The parties recognize that supervisors are required to periodically discuss and review work performance with employees. Such discussions are not investigations, but are opportunities to evaluate and discuss employee performance and, as such, are the prerogative and responsibility of the Employer. An employee shall not have the right to a Union Representative during such performance discussion or review. Any discussions or documentation related to performance review shall remain confidential within the department unless disclosed by the employee. Only authorized Employer representatives, the employee, and the Union representatives authorized by the employee in writing, shall possess or have access to such records. Authorized Employer representatives within the department shall be limited to the employee's supervisors and Office of Human Resources personnel who are assigned responsibility for the employee in question. This section shall not be construed to expand or diminish a right of access to records as provided by the Michigan Freedom of Information Act, being act 442 of Public Acts of 1976, as amended, or as provided by the Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Employee Right to Know Act, being act 397 of Public Acts of 1978, as amended.
Performance Discussion or Review. 18 The parties recognize that supervisors are required to periodically discuss and review 20 opportunities to evaluate and discuss employee performance and, as such, are the 21 prerogative and responsibility of the Employer. An employee shall not have the right 22 to an MSEA Representative during such performance discussion or review.
Performance Discussion or Review. 8 The parties recognize that supervisors are required to periodically discuss and 9 review work performance with employees. Such discussions are not 10 investigations, but are opportunities to evaluate and discuss employee 11 performance and, as such, are the prerogative and responsibility of the 12 Employer. An employee shall not have the right to a Union Representative 13 during such performance discussion or review. Any discussions or 14 documentation related to performance review shall remain confidential within the 15 department unless disclosed by the employee. Only authorized Employer 16 representatives, the employee, and the Union representatives authorized by the 17 employee in writing, shall possess or have access to such records. Authorized 18 Employer representatives within the department shall be limited to the 19 employee's supervisors and Office of Human Resources personnel who are 20 assigned responsibility for the employee in question. This section shall not be 21 construed to expand or diminish a right of access to records as provided by the 22 Michigan Freedom of Information Act, being act 442 of Public Acts of 1976, as 23 amended, or as provided by the Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Employee Right to Know Act, 24 being act 397 of Public Acts of 1978, as amended. 25

Related to Performance Discussion or Review

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Performance while Dispute is Pending Notwithstanding the existence of a dispute, the Supplier must continue without delay to carry out all of its responsibilities under the Contract that are not affected by the dispute. If the Supplier fails to continue without delay to perform its responsibilities under the Contract, in the accomplishment of all undisputed work, the Supplier will bear any additional costs incurred by Sourcewell and/or its Participating Entities as a result of such failure to proceed.

  • Performance Reviews The Employee will be provided with a written performance appraisal at least once per year and said appraisal will be reviewed at which time all aspects of the assessment can be fully discussed.

  • Reviewing Contract Performance 1.1 The Contractor shall work with the Authority to establish and maintain an effective and beneficial working relationship to ensure the Contract is delivered to at least the minimum required standard as specified in the Schedule (The Services).

  • Annual Performance Review The Employee’s performance of his duties under this Agreement shall be reviewed by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors at least annually and finalized within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the annual audited financial statements. The Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors shall additionally review the base salary, bonus and benefits provided to the Employee under this Agreement and may, in their discretion, adjust the same, as outlined in Addendum B of this Agreement, provided, however, that Employee’s annual base salary shall not be less than the base salary set forth in Section 4(A) hereof.

  • Performance Reports None Specified

  • Performance Assessment 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out key performance indicators and competencies that needs to be evaluated in terms of –

  • Joint Review JADRC may, at the request of either party, review issues arising from the application of this Article.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 9. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.