Numerosity. In the Action, approximately 90,331 individuals are members of the proposed Settlement Class. The proposed Settlement Class is thus so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable.
Numerosity. Each class is in excess of 300,000 individual Indians.
Numerosity. In the Action, approximately 120,000 or more individuals, spread out across the country, are members of the proposed Class. Their joinder is impracticable. Thus, the Rule 23(a)(1) numerosity requirement is met. See Xxxxx x. Xxxxxx Trans., 789 F.2d 859, 878 (11th Cir. 1986) (numerosity satisfied where plaintiffs identified at least 31 class members “from a wide geographical area”).
Numerosity. Rule 23(a)(1) requires that a class be “so numerous that their joinder before the Court would be impracticable.” Eggs, 284 F.R.D. at 259. According to Xxxxxxxxxx’s records, there are more than 1,000 lessors whose leases contain the MEC and thus qualify as Settlement Class Members. The numerosity requirement of Rule 23(a) is easily met here. See Eggs, 284 F.R.D. at 260 (quoting Xxxxxxx x. Xxxxxxx, 275 F.3d 220, 227-28 (3d Cir. 2001) (noting that there is no minimum number to satisfy numerosity and observing that generally the requirement is met if the potential number of plaintiffs exceeds 40).
Numerosity. 9. The parties agree that the number of persons who currently subscribe or who subscribed to Comcast’s video programming services (other than solely to basic cable service) between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2008 in the counties of Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Xxxxxxxxxx and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania is at least 800,000. Accordingly, this Court finds the numerosity requirement is satisfied.
Numerosity. The Settlement Class satisfies the numerosity requirement of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a). Xxxxxxx of these widely dispersed, numerous Settlement Class Members into one suit would be impracticable.
Numerosity. The Class, which is ascertainable, consists of nearly a million members located throughout the United States and satisfies the numerosity requirement of FED. R. CIV. P. 23(a)(1). Xxxxxxx of these widely-dispersed, numerous Class Members into one suit would be impracticable.
Numerosity. The potential number of persons in the Class is so numerous that joinder of all members would be unfeasible and impractical. The disposition of their claims through this class action will benefit both parties and this Court. The number of persons in this Class is unknown to Plaintiffs at this time; however, it is estimated that the number exceeds 40,000 individuals.
Numerosity. The parties estimate that the Settlement Class may include between 3,800 and 4,000 persons who meet this class definition. The numerosity requirement of FED. R. CIV. P. 23(a) is satisfied. Xxxxxxx of these widely-dispersed, numerous Settlement Class Members into one suit would be impracticable.
Numerosity. In this case, many thousands of individuals have asserted claims or have potential claims. Thus, the Rule 23(a)(1) numerosity requirement has been met. SUBMITTING YOUR CLAIM
