November 2001. In interpreting and implementing the rights and obligations under this Chapter, each Party shall ensure consistency with that Declaration.
November 2001. It expands the scope of application to non- international armed conflicts. The amended convention entered into force on 18 May 2004. Protocol I prohibits the use of weapons intended to injure by fragments which are not detectable in the human body by X-rays. Protocol II prohibits or restricts the use of mines, booby-traps and other devices. Amended Protocol II, which entered into force on 3 December 1998, reinforces the constraints regarding landmines. Protocol III restricts the use of incendiary weapons. Protocol IV, which entered into force on 30 July 1998, prohibits the employment of laser weapons specifically designed to cause permanent blindness to un-enhanced vision. Protocol V, which entered into force on 12 November 2006, recognizes the need for measures of a generic nature to minimize the risks and effects of explosive rem- nants of war. Parties to the original convention and protocols (103): Albania, Argentina*, Australia, Austria, Bangladesh, Belarus, Belgium, Benin1, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada*, Cape Verde, Chile1, China*, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus*, Czech Republic, Denmark, Djibouti, Ecuador, El Salvador, Estonia1, Finland, France*, Gabon, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Holy See*, Honduras, Hungary, India, Ireland, Israel*2, Italy*, Japan, Jordan1, Korea (South)3, Laos, Latvia, Lesotho, Liberia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania1, Luxembourg, Macedonia (Former Yugoslav Republic of), Maldives1, Mali, Malta, Mauritius, Mexico, Moldova, Monaco3, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco4, Nauru, Netherlands*, New Zealand, Nicaragua1, Niger, Norway, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru1, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Romania*, Russia, Senegal5, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone1, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Switzerland, Tajikistan, Togo, Tunisia, Turkey*3, Turkmenistan2, Uganda, UK*, Ukraine, Uruguay, USA*2, Uzbekistan, Venezuela * With reservation and/or declaration. 1 Party only to 1981 Protocols I and III. 2 Party only to 1981 Protocols I and II. 3 Party only to 1981 Protocol I. 4 Party only to 1981 Protocol II. 5 Party only to 1981 Protocol III. Signed but not ratified the original convention and protocols: Afghanistan, Egypt, Iceland, Nigeria, Sudan, Viet Nam Parties to the amended convention and original protocols (56): Albania, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Canada, Chile, China, Croatia, Cuba, Czech Republic, Den...
November 2001. 2. The Parties shall respect the Decision of the WTO General Council of 30 August 2003 on paragraph 6 of the declaration referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and shall contribute to its implementation.
November 2001. 102.84431909 December 2005..... 135.37775813 January 2010...... 109.
November 2001. Comment: It stipulates that any investor-state dispute involving the amount of compensation may be submitted to ad hoc arbitral tribunal if they cannot be settled through negotiation within a year. With regard to the standards of treatment, apart from fair and equitable treatment, for China it stipulates that investment shall be accorded most favoured nation treatment, whilst for Syria it requires that investment shall be accorded national treatment, which is different from the second Model BIT. Agreement Between the Government of the People's Republic of China and the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic Concerning the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments The Government of the People's Republic of China and the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic (hereinafter referred to as the Contracting Parties), Intending to create favorable conditions for investments by investors of one Contracting Party in the territory of the other Contracting Party; Recognizing that the reciprocal encouragement, promotion and protection of such investments will be conducive to stimulating business initiative of the investors and will increase prosperity in both States; Desiring to intensify thd economic cooperation of both States on the basis of equality and mutual benefits; Have agreed as follows:
November 2001. The Convention and the Aviation Protocol are read and interpreted together as a single document as required by Article 6(1) of the Convention and reference to the Convention in this opinion includes the Aviation Protocol. In this opinion, references are made to the Articles of the Consolidated Text which is a combination of the Convention and the Aviation Protocol authorised and created pursuant to Resolution No. 1 of the Diplomatic Conference to Adopt a Mobile Equipment Convention and an Aircraft Protocol. References to “Irish law” include the Convention as enacted into Irish law by the International Interests in Mobile Equipment (Cape Town Convention) Act, 2005. Terms used in this opinion in respect of the Convention (whether or not capitalised) and not otherwise defined in this opinion shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Consolidated Text or the Regulations issued by the Supervisory Authority for the International Registry pursuant to Article 27 of the Consolidated Text (the Regulations).
November 2001. 1. We recognize the gravity of the public health problems afflicting many developing and least- developed countries, especially those resulting from HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria and other epidemics.
November 2001. 70.01748443 August 2006..... 30.
November 2001. 123.06491991 December 2006... 96.
November 2001. The amounts referred to in (a) and (b) above shall be paid in the same manner as is referred to in clause 5.1.1.
