Not a “Project” Under CEQA Sample Clauses

Not a “Project” Under CEQA. (1) If the transaction is not a “project” under CEQA, please explain why. Similar to the CPUC’s approval of a Master Agreement for Xxxxx in D.00-00-000, PG&E’s advice letter here seeks the Commission’s approval of a Master Agreement for Xxxxxx, which like Xxxxx, is not a “project” within the meaning of Public Resources Code Section 21065 (CEQA). The Master Agreement for Xxxxxx neither, in and of itself, has any potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment within the meaning of CEQA Guideline 15378(a). Rather, approval of this advice letter merely establishes a standardized set of terms and framework applicable to future unspecified individual site licenses (D.09- 07-035, Conclusion of Law 2, mimeo, p. 24; see also overall CEQA discussion, mimeo at pp. 9-11). The site-specific information in these future site licenses will be subject to future Section 851 approvals. However, under the existing circumstances, no CEQA review is required for the proposed approval of the Master License Agreement here, as the CPUC found was appropriate in approving the Xxxxx MLA in D.09-07- 035. Lastly, D.00-00-000, mimeo, pp. 10-11, states: Several courts have recognized that the adoption of broad-brush or preliminary planning tools–tools that establish some type of roadmap or framework for processing future approvals–do not commit an agency to a particular course of action on a particular project and thus do not trigger CEQA review. For example, in Environmental Council of Sacramento v. City of Sacramento (2006) 142 Cal.App.4th 1018, an agency Advice 3112-G/3654-E - 13 - April 23, 2010
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Not a “Project” Under CEQA

  • Project Completion Date It is agreed between the Parties that the Project Completion Date is <END DATE, YEAR>. If the Project is not completed by such date then, subject to an amendment agreed to between the Parties, Alberta Innovates may elect to terminate this Investment Agreement. In such event, Alberta Innovates will notify the Applicant of its decision to terminate as soon as reasonably practical and shall advise the Applicant of the effective date of termination. Alberta Innovates will have no liability or obligation to reimburse the Applicant for any Project Costs incurred after the effective date of termination and may require the Applicant to return any portions of the Investment which were spent on Ineligible Expenses. Additionally, any portion of the Investment not used and accounted for in accordance with this Agreement as of the Project Completion Date or earlier termination is repayable by the Applicant to AI at AI’s request.

  • Construction Phase Part 1 –

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.