Common use of Non-Competitive Bid Justification Clause in Contracts

Non-Competitive Bid Justification. If a service or product is of a unique nature, is in response to a public exigency or emergency, or more than one vendor/provider cannot reasonably be identified, Contractor shall maintain adequate justification for the absence of competitive bidding. “Adequate justification” must include, but is not limited to: (a) explanation of why the acquisition of goods or services is limited to one vendor or supplier; (b) description of sole vendor/supplier’s unique qualifications to provide the goods or services in question; and (c) analysis of cost(s) to demonstrate reasonableness.

Non-Competitive Bid Justification. If a service or product is of a unique nature, is in response to a public exigency or emergency, or more than one vendor/provider cannot reasonably be identified, Contractor shall maintain adequate justification for the absence of competitive bidding. “Adequate justification” “Adequate justification” must include, but is not limited to: (a) explanation of why the acquisition of goods or services is limited to one vendor or supplier; (b) description of sole vendor/supplier’s supplier’s unique qualifications to provide the goods or services in question; and (c) analysis of cost(s) to demonstrate reasonableness.

Non-Competitive Bid Justification. If a service or product is of a unique nature, is in response to a public exigency or emergency, or more than one vendor/provider cannot reasonably be identified, Contractor shall maintain adequate justification for the absence of competitive bidding. “Adequate justification” must include, include but is not limited to: (a) explanation of why the acquisition of goods or services is limited to one vendor or supplier; (b) description of sole vendor/supplier’s unique qualifications to provide the goods or services in question; and (c) analysis of cost(s) to demonstrate reasonableness.