No Surprises. Each party shall maintain a “no surprises” policy that keeps one another informed of issues that may have an impact on the ability of the Parties to carry out the intent of this XXX.
No Surprises. The Recipient shall communicate regularly with Council about its use of the Funding, including promptly raising and escalating any issues (including media issues) likely to be of concern to Council.
No Surprises. 7.1. Seller Members promise that they have the necessary tax clearances so that Buyer Members will not be held liable for any employers’ liability
No Surprises. Assurances. Provided that the Permittees have complied with their obligations under the SLCHCP, this Agreement, and the Permits, the USFWS can require the Permittees to provide mitigation beyond that provided for in the SLCHCP only under unforeseen circumstances, in accordance with the “No Surprises” regulations at 50 C.F.R. §§ 17.22(b)(5), 17.32(b)(5).
No Surprises. Recipient shall communicate regularly with Funder about its use of the Funding, including promptly raising and escalating any issues (including media issues) likely to be of concern to Funder.
No Surprises. (Def. 5): Assume that the verifier V obtained the result (tid, contr, accepted) from some party Pj. Then, Pj must have shown to V a major proof set for contr with the set of signatories Hj. The condition Q2 implies that there is some honest party Ph in Hj. Then Ph received the minor proof set for contr, which means that all honest parties received the input contr. Besides, Ph must have received true from π, and therefore, all honest parties received or will receive the output true from π and therefore, the result contr. HH
No Surprises. (a) To the extent possible, the parties will uphold a kaupapa of ‘no surprises’ with each other.
No Surprises. Do not wait until the deal is done to figure out what has to happen to make it work. Everything about the transition should have been thoroughly discussed and decided with the involvement of the affected people during consideration of the partnership. Thus, the employee, equipment, facility and accounting changes required to make the transition are already known and detailed in the transition plan. The understanding and trust required for day-to-day management of the partnership depend on doing this very well.
No Surprises. Each party must notify the other as soon as reasonably practicable of any actual or anticipated issues that could:
No Surprises. If some Pi H obtained (tid, y) from consensus[], then V never obtains the result dV = (y′, accepted) on input (verify, Pj, tid ) for any party Pj and y′ y. – Termination of verify[]: Each V and each Pi ∈ H eventually terminate. ♦ No Surprises says, in particular, that if some honest party Pi never started or not yet finished consensus[] for some tid, then the verifier cannot accept any result y for tid from some party Pj, honest or dishonest, unless Pi is guaranteed to obtain y for tid. We now show how to define the contract signing problem within our framework.
