Neighboring Lands Sample Clauses

Neighboring Lands. The City of Phoenix Aviation Department maintains the stretch of the Salt River between SR 143 and just east of the I-10 Bridge. If the Permittee’s voluntary conservation actions result in covered species occupying adjacent properties, the Service will use the maximum authority allowed under the ESA to address neighboring properties. Implications to neighboring landowners with non-enrolled lands will be determined on a case-by-case basis. In general, the Service will make every effort to include the neighboring landowner as a signatory party to this or a separate agreement and permit. Nothing in this Agreement requires the Permittee to take any action with respect to endangered species or habitat on property that is not within the enrolled lands.

Neighboring Lands. The Permittee’s land is adjacent to an evolving habitat located outside the City of Tempe and within the Salt River bed. An approximately 90-acre area of the riverbed is continually inundated by stormwater runoff from the ADOT 202 and 101 freeway interchange, adjacent cities’ stormwater discharge, and discharge of treated effluent from a City of Mesa water reclamation plant. This continual water source permits volunteer cottonwood trees and rushes to thrive, thereby attracting large numbers of birds and waterfowl. No threatened or endangered species have been documented for this area, but there is a possibility that it could be colonized from the Permittee’s land or as a result of the emerging habitat. Urban private development adjacent to the Tempe Town Lake is not immediately suitable as habitat, but could be used by species originating from the Permittee’s land or the nearby 90 acre emerging habitat area. Non-participating private landowners, outside of the enrolled lands, are not covered under the Permit associated with this Agreement. If the Permittee’s voluntary conservation actions result in listed species occupying adjacent properties, the Service will use the maximum flexibility allowed under the ESA to address neighboring properties under the Agreement and associated Permit. The Service’s potential actions include, but are not limited to, granting incidental take authority to owners of neighboring lands where occupation is expected as a result of the Agreement. Implications to neighboring landowners with non-enrolled lands will be determined on a case-by-case basis. In general, the Service will make every effort to include the neighboring landowner as a signatory party to this or a separate agreement and permit. A separate agreement could allow, for example, the Service to enter the adjacent property and remove any covered species individuals for relocation elsewhere.

Neighboring Lands. In general, the Service will make every effort to include neighboring landowners as signatory parties to a Safe Harbor Agreement. If the Permittee’s voluntary conservation actions result in Covered Species’ occupying adjacent properties not covered by a Safe Harbor Agreement, the Service will use the maximum flexibility allowed under the ESA to use the existing incidental take permit to minimize neighboring property owners’ liabilities for these Covered Species. Implications to neighboring landowners with non-enrolled lands will be determined on a case-by-case basis.

Neighboring Lands. Because of the distribution and potential connectivity of habitats suitable for covered species in Pahranagat Valley, the potential exists that suitable habitat on neighboring private ownerships could be colonized by animals from adjacent properties covered under individual landowner Cooperative Agreements and Certificates of Inclusion to this Agreement. Non-participating private landowners are not covered under the take permit associated with this Agreement. If voluntary conservation actions by a Cooperator result in listed species occupying adjacent properties, the Parties will use the maximum flexibility allowed under the ESA to address neighboring properties under the Agreement and associated take permit. The Parties’ potential actions include, but are not limited to, granting take authority to owners of neighboring lands where occupation is expected as a result of the Agreement. Implications to neighboring landowners with non-enrolled lands will be determined on a case-by-case basis. In general, the Parties will make every effort to include the neighboring landowner as a Cooperator to this or a separate agreement and permit. A separate agreement could require, for example, the Parties to enter the adjacent property and remove any species individuals for relocation elsewhere.

Neighboring Lands. Non-participating private landowners, including adjacent landowners with Timber Harvest Plans or NTMPs, are not covered under the take Permit associated with this Agreement.