National Environmental Policy Act Compliance. Upon execution of a -------------------------------------------- Site Agreement, and except as provided in a Site Agreement, BellSouth represents that the Tower and Property comply with the applicable provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act, 47 C.F.
National Environmental Policy Act Compliance. The Service must analyze the impacts of its participation in this SHA/CCAA Agreement as required by NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4332). Any federal agency undertaking a major federal action that is likely to affect the human environment must conduct an environmental review pursuant to NEPA. Issuance of the Service of Enhancement of Survival Permits under the ESA Section 10(a)(1)(A) is a federal action subject to NEPA.
National Environmental Policy Act Compliance. The development of the draft SHA and the proposed issuance of an enhancement of survival permit is a Federal action that triggers the need for compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) (NEPA). We have prepared a draft EA to analyze the impacts of permit issuance and implementation of the SHA on the human environment in comparison to the no-action alternative. Public Comments You may submit your comments and materials by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. We request data, new information, or suggestions from the public, other concerned governmental agencies, Tribes, the scientific community, industry, or any other interested party on our proposed Federal action. In particular, we request information and comments regarding the following issues:
National Environmental Policy Act Compliance. This Agreement is being developed for planning purposes. Before any on-the ground actions can occur on federally managed lands, a determination must be made whether or not the conservation actions are consistent with the applicable agency’s land use or land management plan and whether or not additional NEPA analysis is required. If conservation actions are determined not to be consistent with a land management plan, then these actions must be incorporated into the applicable agency’s land use or land management plan through an amendment or maintenance process before they can be implemented. Actions on lands administered by the state or private lands may not be subject to NEPA analysis.
National Environmental Policy Act Compliance. The development of the draft SHA and the proposed issuance of an enhancement of survival permit are Federal actions that trigger the need for compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). We have prepared a draft EAS to analyze the impacts of permit issuance and implementation of the SHA on the human environment in comparison to the no-action alternative. We have made a preliminary determination that issuing the permit and implementing the SHA would have minor or negligible impacts to the environment, and thus the proposed SHA and permit actions are eligible for categorical exclusion under NEPA. The basis for our preliminary determination is contained in the EAS, which is available for public review (see ADDRESSES). Next Steps We will evaluate the permit application, associated documents, and comments we receive to determine whether the permit application meets the requirements of the ESA, NEPA, and their implementing regulations. If we determine that all requirements are met, we will sign the proposed SHA and issue a permit under section 10(a)(1)(A) of the ESA to the applicant. We will not make our final decision on the permit application until after the end of the public comment period, and we will fully consider all comments we receive during the comment period. Public Availability of Comments Written comments we receive become part of the public record associated with this action. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that the entire comment, including your personal identifying information, may be made available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
National Environmental Policy Act Compliance. The development of the draft SHA and the proposed issuance of an enhancement of survival permit is a Federal action that triggers the need for compliance with the NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). We have prepared a draft EAS to analyze the impacts of permit issuance and implementation of the SHA on the human environment in comparison to the no-action alternative. We have made a preliminary determination that issuing the permit and implementing the SHA would have minor or negligible impacts to the environment, and thus the proposed SHA and permit actions are eligible for categorical exclusion under NEPA. The basis for our preliminary determination is contained in the EAS, which is available for public review (see ADDRESSES). Public Comments You may submit your comments and materials by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. We request data, new information, or comments from the public, other concerned governmental agencies, Tribes, the scientific community, industry, or any other interested party via this notice on our proposed Federal action.
National Environmental Policy Act Compliance. The U.S. Department, of Energy (USDOE), as a federal agency, is required to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. Westinghouse Hanford Company, as the Management and Operating Contractor for the Hanford Site is tasked with assisting the DOE with NEPA compliance. The Seller shall submit to the Buyer a NEPA document the level of which is to be determined by the USDOE, complete in form and format in accordance with the guidance requirements for the preparation of NEPA documentation. This guidance document, "RECOMMENDATIONS for the PREPARATION of ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS and ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS," dated May 1993 from the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of NEPA Oversight is included (Attachment 3). The submitted documentation may include but is not limited to pertinent environmental data and analyses by the Seller relative to their RCRA Treatment, Storage, and Disposal permit. The pertinent information shall include, but not be limited to, NRC license status; federal, state, local, and Tribal environmental permit status; existing federal and/or state environmental documents; federal, state and self or in house environmental assessments, including audit findings and corresponding corrective actions; plant processing capability within guidelines of operating permit; and discussions of potential environmental effects from the order addressing direct and indirect effects, long and short term effects, proposed mitigation measures, adverse effects that can not be avoided, and any areas where environmental information is incomplete or unavailable. The Seller is responsible for providing this NEPA Document for approval by the USDOE. In addition, the Seller shall provide additional data, explanation, clarification, etc. as required to obtain DOE approval of the NEPA document.
National Environmental Policy Act Compliance. In accordance with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), we advise the public that:
National Environmental Policy Act Compliance. ADD PROVISION IF -------------------------------------------- BELLSOUTH HAS NOT COMPLIED OR IS IN THE PROCESS OF COMPLYING WITH NEPA.]
National Environmental Policy Act Compliance. The development of the draft SHA and the proposed issuance of a permit is a Federal action that triggers the need for compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). The Service has made a preliminary determination that the proposed SHA and permit application are eligible for a categorical exclusion under NEPA, based on the following criteria: (1) Implementation of the SHA would result in minor or negligible adverse effects on federally listed, proposed, and candidate species and their habitats; (2) implementation of the SHA would result in minor or negligible adverse effects on other environmental values or resources; and (3) impacts of the SHA, considered together with the impacts of other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable similarly situated projects, would not result, over time, in cumulative adverse effects to environmental values or resources which would be considered significant. We explain the basis for this determination in more detail in an Environmental Action Statement (EAS) that is also available for public review. Based on the EAS, we have preliminarily determined that the issuance of the associated permit would have minor or negligible adverse effects on the species covered in the SHA. Therefore, we determined that the SHA qualifies for categorical exclusion under NEPA, as provided by the Department of the Interior NEPA regulations (43 CFR part 46).
