Minimal Requirements Sample Clauses

Minimal Requirements. SPORT SAFE agrees to meet or exceed the following minimum requirements as they pertain to this contract:

Minimal Requirements. 5.1. In order to use the Website and Services, you should have:

Minimal Requirements. All aspects of performance of music will meet, as a minimum, the provisions of the Australian Standard 1269—1989 Acoustics—Hearing Conservation, the National Standard for Occupation Noise [NOHSC:2009(1993)], and the National Code of Practice for Noise Management and Protection of Hearing at Work [NOHSC:2009(1993)].

Minimal Requirements. When a conductor complains that intonation is faulty or attention to balance is lacking or otherwise insufficient from a musician who judges it necessary to use earplugs, that conductor must be informed by the Orchestra Resources Manager that noise levels appear to be such that hearing protection should be worn and therefore good intonation and attention to proper balance may be difficult to achieve. The Health and Safety Representative (or in the absence of the HSR, the Deputy Health and Safety Representative) must be informed when this advice is given to the Conductor, and may be present and take part in such discussions, or any that arise.

Minimal Requirements. United States x. Xxxxxx, 58 X.X. 739 (X. Xx. Xxxx. App. 2003). During plea colloquy concerning wrongful appropriation, military judge “failed to follow the usual practice of Army military judges in that he did not read to appellant applicable definitions from the [Benchbook],” including the definitions of the terms “possession,” “owner,” “belongs,” and “took.” As for the colloquy concerning the forgery offense, the military judge likewise failed to provide any definitions from the Benchbook, including those for the terms, “falsely made or altered” and “intent to defraud.” Nonetheless, ACCA affirmed the findings and sentence. For practitioners, in most complex offenses (such as conspiracy or accessory after the fact) failure to explain the elements will generally result in reversal; however, a plea is not “automatically rendered improvident by the military judge’s failure to identify or explain the elements of the offense ‘if the accused admits facts which establish that all the elements were true.’” Despite finding the military judge’s failure reflects a “lack of attention to detail,” the three most critical requirements for a provident guilty plea were met. Accused admitted facts necessary to establish the charges, expressed a belief in his own guilt, and there were no inconsistencies between the facts and the pleas.