Major Cases Clause Samples
Major Cases. Any discharge imposed among other things for breach of trust, dis- honesty, theft, sleeping, drunkenness, drinking intoxicants while on duty or on Commission property, being in possession of an intoxicat- ing beverage or drug, for other than medicinal purposes, while on duty, for working under the influence of liquor or drugs, or convic- tion of a criminal offense, if proved to the satisfaction of representa- tives of the Union and the Commission shall not be subject to appeal beyond Step 2 of the grievance procedure.
Major Cases. Any discharge imposed among other things for drunkenness, drink- ing intoxicants while on duty or on Commission property, for work- ing under the influence of liquor or drugs, the commission of graffiti or scratchiti or a violation of human rights if proved to the satisfac- tion of representatives of the Union and the Commission shall not be subject to appeal beyond Step 4 of the Grievance Procedure. Any discharge imposed among other things for breach of trust, dis- honesty, theft, sleeping on duty or conviction of a criminal offense, causing an accident through carelessness or violation of safety rules and procedures if proved to the satisfaction of representatives of the Union and the Commission shall be subject to appeal as outlined in the Grievance Procedure.
Major Cases. 904 There is no case where Japan has been urged to amend specific laws and regulations or notifications due to EPA obligation provisions regarding intellectual property. This means that, from Japan’s perspective, the intellectual property rights provisions of EPAs function to strengthen the intellectual property systems of counterparty countries. In addition, the dispute settlement procedures under EPAs for the rights and obligations relating to intellectual property may serve as a basis upon which to inquire about the implementation of obligations of the counterparty country. It is believed that when the number of specific cases rises, the practicality of the foregoing could be further ascertained. WIPO is a specialized agency of the United Nations dealing with intellectual property rights ( i.e., patent rights, industrial design rights, trademark rights, and copyrights). WIPO internationally promotes intellectual property protection by: i) developing treaties which aim to harmonize the systems of the WIPO member states; ii) raising protection levels in developing countries through technology cooperation; and iii) promoting information sharing. ▇▇▇▇ also administers and operates treaties and international registration systems regarding intellectual property rights. WIPO’s headquarters are in Geneva, and it currently has 188 member states (as of January 2016). The treaties administered by WIPO include those listed below; there are EPAs/FTAs which provide the requirement to accede to such treaties. (See the Agreements mentioned in the Reference.)
Major Cases. 8.1 The OPP Criminal Investigation Branches primary function is to provide case management and expert investigative assistance on serious criminal matters. Expertise in extradition matters is also provided.
8.2 The Senior Officer of NAPS may request the services of Criminal Investigation Branch and once the assistance has been authorized, the Branch shall assume and maintain case management until the conclusion of the investigation.
8.3 The OPP member assigned to the investigation shall liaise with the Senior Officer of NAPS to determine shared resources.
Major Cases. Any discharge imposed among other things for drunkenness, drinking intoxicants while on duty or on Commission property, for working under the influence of liquor or drugs if proved to the satisfaction of representatives of the Union and the Commission shall not be subject to appeal beyond Step of the Grievance Procedure. Any discharge imposed among other things for breach of trust, dishonesty, theft, sleeping on duty or conviction of a criminal offense, causing an accident through carelessness or violation of safety rules and procedures if proved to the satisfaction of representatives of the Union and the Commission shall be subject to appeal as outlined in the Grievance Procedure.
Major Cases. It is pertinent to point out that the most emblematic cases in 2016 were marked by two rulings that defined the orientation of the peace process in Colombia. That is why it is pertinent to mention the Sentence C-376 dated 2016 that reviewed the viability of the special plebiscite (A), and the Sentence C-699 dated 2016 reviewing two articles of the challenged Legislative Act 1 dated 2016, which authorized the Fast track (B) implementation of the Final Agreement.
Major Cases. A case is classified as 'major' if, for example, the customer experiences suddenly occurred situations resulting in most of the enterprise’s devices not being able to use the IoT Connectivity service. The following examples of major cases can be listed: • Crash that blocks access to computer connection, SMS messaging and voice. • No access to the self-service platform, including no access via API • Transmission crash for customers with the supplementary product Private APN that results in no access to data, SMS messaging and voice (for example fault in or fault connected with the customer’s MPLS connection connected to the IoT Connectivity service.
4. Fault correction time, repair time and support time
Major Cases. 785 There is few cases in which Japan has been urged to amend specific laws and regulations or notifications due to EPA obligation provisions regarding intellectual property. This means that, from Japan’s perspective, the intellectual property rights provisions of EPAs function to strengthen the intellectual property systems of counterparty countries. In addition, the dispute settlement procedures under EPAs for the rights and obligations relating to intellectual property may serve as a basis upon which to inquire about the implementation of obligations of the counterparty country. It is believed that when the number of specific cases rises, the practicality of the foregoing could be further ascertained. Part III: FTA/EPA and IIA COLUMN INTERNATIONAL TREATIES RELATED TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION (WIPO) WIPO is a specialized agency of the United Nations dealing with intellectual property rights (i.e., patent rights, industrial design rights, trademark rights, and copyrights). WIPO internationally promotes intellectual property protection by: i) developing treaties which aim to harmonize the systems of the WIPO member states; ii) raising protection levels in developing countries through technology cooperation; and iii) promoting information sharing. ▇▇▇▇ also administers and operates treaties and international registration systems regarding intellectual property rights. WIPO’s headquarters are in Geneva, and it currently has 189 member states (as of February 2017). The treaties administered by WIPO include those listed below; there are EPAs/FTAs which provide the requirement to accede to such treaties. (See the Agreements mentioned in the Reference.)
Major Cases. There is no case where Japan has been urged to amend specific laws and regulations or notifications due to EPA obligation provisions regarding intellectual property. This means that, from Japan’s perspective, the intellectual property rights provisions of EPAs function to strengthen the intellectual property systems of counterparty countries. In addition, the dispute settlement procedures under EPAs for the rights and obligations relating to intellectual property may serve as a basis upon which to inquire about the implementation of obligations of the counterparty country. It is believed that when the number of specific cases rises, the practicality of the foregoing could be further ascertained.
