Lowest Cost Sample Clauses

Lowest Cost. The least costly rate per type of trip, including dispatch charges, vehicle maintenance, etc.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Lowest Cost. All of TIML's (or any Affiliate's) equipment used on the Calcium Carbonate site shall be charged at the lower of (i) actual cost, or (ii) prevailing competitive third-party rates in New Mexico, after giving effect to any and all available discounts, whether or not actually taken or realized;
Sample 1
Lowest Cost. All of TIML's (or any Affiliate's) equipment and/or services used on the Sierra KaolinTM site shall be charged at the lower of (i) actual cost, or (ii) prevailing competitive third-party rates in New Mexico, after giving effect to any and all available discounts, whether or not actually taken or realized;
Sample 1
Lowest Cost. In the 2013 IRP, all of the EPAs that had expiry dates in fiscal 2014 through to fiscal 2033 were assumed to be agreements eligible for renewal. As existing contracts have been expiring, each IPP project has been individually assessed. If BC Hydro and the IPP could reach agreement on a contract that was cost-effective in consideration of our long term system needs, BC Energy Objectives in the Clean Energy Act, as well as other project attributes (described further below), then the EPA may have been renewed provided that the renewal costs could be managed within the applicable financial framework. BC Hydro expectations have been that the EPA renewal portfolio as a whole would likely have the lowest cost relative to other potential clean or renewable greenfield supply options. The EPAs within the EPA renewal portfolio did not expire/terminate at the same time and it was not possible to identify, prior to each of the negotiations being completed, which EPAs would have had the lowest cost. For example, an existing EPA contract price was not expected to factor into an IPP’s cost of service going forward. BC Hydro has not developed a process to identify the lowest cost contracts within the EPA renewal portfolio prior to entering into negotiations with specific IPP projects;
Sample 1

Related to Lowest Cost

  • Total Cost It is estimated that the total cost to Princeton University for the performance of this Contract shall not exceed the Not-to-Exceed Price set forth in the Contract and the Contractor agrees to use its best efforts to perform the Work specified in the Contract and all obligations under this Contract within such Not-to- Exceed Price. If at any time the Contractor has reason to believe that the hourly rate payments and material costs that will accrue in performing this Contract in the next succeeding thirty (30) days, if added to all other payments and costs previously accrued, will exceed eighty-five percent (85%) of the Not-to-Exceed Price in the Contract, the Contractor shall notify Princeton University giving a revised estimate of the total price for performing this Contract with supporting reasons and documentation. If at any time during performing this Contract, the Contractor has reason to believe that the total price to Princeton University for performing this Contract will be substantially greater or less than stated Not-to-Exceed Price, the Contractor shall so notify Princeton University, giving a revised estimate of the total price for performing this Contract, with supporting reasons and documentation. If at any time during performance of this Contract, Princeton University has reason to believe that the cost required to perform the Work of this Contract will be substantially greater or less than the stated Not-to-Exceed Price, Princeton University will so advise the Contractor, giving the then- revised estimate of the total amount of effort to be required under the Contract.

  • At Cost Any of the above services when performed outside regular working hours of Agent may be billed at 150 percent of the above.

  • Replacement Cost The term “full replacement cost” as used herein shall mean the actual replacement cost of the Leased Property requiring replacement from time to time including an increased cost of construction endorsement, if available, and the cost of debris removal. In the event either party believes that full replacement cost (the then-replacement cost less such exclusions) has increased or decreased at any time during the Lease Term, it shall have the right to have such full replacement cost re-determined.

  • Least-cost Selection Services for assignments which the Association agrees meet the requirements of paragraph 3.6 of the Consultant Guidelines may be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of Least-cost Selection in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 3.1 and 3.6 of the Consultant Guidelines.

  • Project Cost a. The estimated cost of the Project is $ 97,740.00. This amount is based upon the Schedule of Financial Assistance in Exhibit "B", attached to and incorporated in this Agreement. Exhibit “B” may be modified by mutual execution of an amendment as provided for in paragraph 5.i.

  • Estimated Cost Estimated costs by construction phases for Specified Roads listed in A7 are stated by segments in the Schedule of Items. Such estimated costs are subject to adjustment under B3.3, B5.2, B5.21, B5.212, B5.25, and B5.26. Appropriately adjusted costs shall be made a part of a revised Schedule of Items and shown as adjustments to Timber Sale Account. The revised Schedule of Items shall supersede any prior Schedule of Items when it is dated and signed by Contracting Officer and a copy is furnished to Purchaser.

  • Interest Coverage As of the end of any fiscal quarter, the Borrowers will not permit the ratio of (a) Consolidated EBITDA to (b) Consolidated Cash Interest Expense for the four (4) consecutive fiscal quarters then ending to be less than 4.25:1.

  • Minimum Interest Coverage The Borrower will not permit the ratio of EBITDA to Consolidated Interest Expense as at any fiscal quarter end for the four fiscal quarters then ending to be less than 3.00 to 1.0.

  • Amount The required additional Security shall be in an amount equal to the amount necessary to gross up fully for currently applicable federal and state income taxes the estimated Costs of Local Upgrades and Network Upgrades for which Interconnection Customer previously provided Security. Accordingly, the additional Security shall equal the amount necessary to increase the total Security provided to the amount that would be sufficient to permit the Interconnected Transmission Owner to receive and retain, after the payment of all applicable income taxes (“Current Taxes”) and taking into account the present value of future tax deductions for depreciation that would be available as a result of the anticipated payments or property transfers (the “Present Value Depreciation Amount”), an amount equal to the estimated Costs of Local Upgrades and Network Upgrades for which Interconnection Customer is responsible under the Interconnection Service Agreement. For this purpose, Current Taxes shall be computed based on the composite federal and state income tax rates applicable to the Interconnected Transmission Owner at the time the additional Security is received, determined using the highest marginal rates in effect at that time (the “Current Tax Rate”), and (ii) the Present Value Depreciation Amount shall be computed by discounting the Interconnected Transmission Owner’s anticipated tax depreciation deductions associated with such payments or property transfers by its current weighted average cost of capital.

  • Total Project Cost The total cost of the Project is $36,378,683, of which (i) a match is being contributed in the amount of $21,000,000 shall be Matching Funds, and (ii) $15,378,683 shall be provided by the Grant. The total estimated cost of the Project is based upon the Budget. To the extent that the actual cost of the Project exceeds $36,378,683, Grantee shall be solely responsible for such excess. Grantee shall monitor the Budget and submit an amended Budget to Triumph in the event that (a) the total cost of the Project increases or decreases by greater than five percent (5%), (b) total the Budget increases or decreases by greater than five percent (5%), (c) the Budget increases or decreases by greater than five percent (5%) within a particular Budget category, and/or (d) Grantee’s portion of the Matching funds decreases by greater than five percent (5%). If Grantee proposes an increase or decrease by greater than five percent (5%) as described above as compared to the most recently approved Budget, such proposal shall be submitted to Triumph in writing along with a proposed amended Budget, and Triumph shall have the right to approve or disapprove both the proposed Budget category increase or decrease and the proposed amended Budget. If Grantee fails to obtain Triumph's approval, that failure shall be sufficient cause for nonpayment by Triumph as provided in Section 4.2(f). Using the Grant, its own funds, and funds from other sources (including, but not limited to, the Matching Funds), Grantee agrees to bear the entire cost and expense of the Project, including but not limited to, all costs and all expenses in excess of the total estimated cost of the Project, it being expressly understood and agreed that the Grant shall operate only to pay, on and subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, a portion of the costs and expenses of the Project. Furthermore, Grantee agrees to spend all of the Matching Funds as contemplated in the Budget, and agrees that its failure to do so shall be deemed a material breach of this Agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.