Common use of Litigation History Clause in Contracts

Litigation History. The bidder shall disclose the litigation history as mentioned in Packet 'B. If there is no litigation history, the bidder shall specifically mention that there is no litigation history against him. In case there is litigation history- Litigation History must cover – Any action of blacklisting, debarring, banning, suspension, de-registration and cheating with BMC, State Govt., Central Govt. or any authority under State or Central Govt./ Govt. Organisation initiated against the company, firm, directors, partners or authorized signatory shall be disclosed for last 5 years from the date of submission of bid. Also, bidder must disclose the litigation history for the last 5 years from the date of submission of bid about any action like show caused issued, blacklisting, debarring, banning, suspension, de-registration and cheating with BMC and BMC is party in the litigation against the company, firm, directors, partners or authorized signatory for carrying out any work for BMC by any authority of BMC and the orders passed by the competent authority or by any Court where BMC is a party. While taking decision on litigation history, the concerned Chief Engineer or D.M.C. Or Director, as may be the case, should consider the details submitted by bidder and take decision based on the gravity of the litigation and the adverse effect of the act of company, firm, directors, partners or authorized signatory on the BMC works which can spoil the quality, output, delivery of any goods or any work execution and within the time frame.

Litigation History. The bidder shall disclose the litigation history as mentioned in Packet 'B. If there is no litigation history, the bidder shall specifically mention that there is no litigation history against him. In case there is litigation history- Litigation History must cover cover– Any action of blacklisting, debarring, banning, suspension, de-registration and cheating with BMC, State Govt., Central Govt. or any authority under State or Central Govt./ Govt. Organisation initiated against the company, firm, directors, partners or authorized signatory shall be disclosed for last 5 years from the date of submission of bid. Also, bidder must disclose the litigation history for the last 5 years from the date of submission of bid about any action like show caused issued, blacklisting, debarring, banning, suspension, de-registration and cheating with BMC and BMC is party in the litigation against the company, firm, directors, partners or authorized signatory for carrying out any work for BMC by any authority of BMC and the orders passed by the competent authority or by any Court where BMC is a party. While taking decision on litigation history, the concerned Chief Engineer or D.M.C. Or Engineer/ D.M.C./ Director, as may be the case, should consider the details submitted by bidder and take decision based on the gravity of the litigation and the adverse effect of the act of company, firm, directors, partners or authorized signatory on the BMC works which can spoil the quality, output, delivery of any goods or any work execution and within the time frame.

Litigation History. The bidder shall disclose the litigation history as mentioned in Packet 'B. If there is no litigation history, the bidder shall specifically mention that there is no litigation history against him. In case there is litigation history- Litigation History must cover cover– Any action of blacklisting, debarring, banning, suspension, de-registration and cheating with BMC, State Govt., Central Govt. or any authority under State or Central Govt./ Govt. Organisation initiated against the company, firm, directors, partners or authorized signatory shall be disclosed for last 5 years from the date of submission of bid. Also, bidder must disclose the litigation history for the last 5 years from the date of submission of bid about any action like show caused issued, blacklisting, debarring, banning, suspension, de-registration and cheating with BMC and BMC is party in the litigation against the company, firm, directors, partners or authorized signatory for carrying out any work for BMC by any authority of BMC and the orders passed by the competent authority or by any Court where BMC is a party. While taking decision on litigation history, the concerned Chief Engineer or D.M.C. Or Director, as may be the case, should consider the details submitted by bidder and take decision based on the gravity of the litigation and the adverse effect of the act of company, firm, directors, partners or authorized signatory on the BMC works which can spoil the quality, output, delivery of any goods or any work execution and within the time frame.

Litigation History. The bidder shall disclose the litigation history as mentioned in Packet 'B. B'. If there is no litigation history, the bidder shall specifically mention that there is no litigation history against him. In case there is litigation history- Litigation History must cover – Any action of blacklisting, debarring, banning, suspension, de-registration deregistration and cheating with BMCMCGM, State Govt., Central Govt. or any authority under State or Central Govt./ GovtGovt./Govt. Organisation initiated against the company, firm, directors, partners parteners or authorized signatory shall be disclosed for last 5 years from the date of submission of bid. Also, bidder must disclose the litigation history for the last 5 years from the date of submission of bid about any action like show caused cause issued, blacklisting, debarring, banning, suspension, de-registration deregistration and cheating with BMC MCGM and BMC MCGM is party in the litigation against the company, firm, directors, partners or authorized signatory for carrying out any work for BMC MCGM by any authority of BMC MCGM and the orders passed by the competent authority or by any Court where BMC MCGM is a party. While taking decision on litigation history, the concerned Chief Engineer or D.M.C. Or Director, as may be the case, should consider the details submitted by bidder and take decision based on the gravity of the litigation and the adverse effect of the act of company, firm, directors, partners or authorized signatory on the BMC MCGM works which can spoil the quality, output, delivery of any goods or any work execution and within the time frame.