Key Offset Attack Clause Samples

POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Key Offset Attack. In this attack an adversary modifies the message being sent by multiplying the Ephemeral Public Key with its own exponent λ. This offsets the agreed session key by the same exponent unknown to either of the parties. This happens in protocols where key confirmation is absent. In the pro- tocol proposed by ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇, the absence of origin authentication causes a vulnerability. The same is remedied in our protocol by adding an extra term in the message being sent. The extra term is effectively a ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ signature of the original terms being sent. The signature is verified in the correctness check of Steps 5, 8 in Algorithm 1. For an active adversary to successfully mount the attack in this model, it should have the ability to generate a new signature, to go with the message being sent. This cannot be achieved as the signature generation involves the long term secret key of the user, which the adversary is unaware of.

Related to Key Offset Attack

  • VENDOR OFFSET AND ERRONEOUS PAYMENTS 24-30-202(1) and 24-30- 202.4, C.R.S.

  • Venue Limitation for TIPS Sales Vendor agrees that if any "Venue" provision is included in any TIPS Sale Agreement/contract between Vendor and a TIPS Member, that clause must provide that the "Venue" for any litigation or alternative dispute resolution shall be in the state and county where the TIPS Member operates unless the TIPS Member expressly agrees otherwise. Any TIPS Sale Supplemental Agreement containing a “Venue” clause that conflicts with these terms is rendered void and unenforceable.

  • Performance Deficiencies If the City or the Quality Control Manager determine in their reasonable belief that any of the Infrastructure Improvements are not being constructed in accordance with the Infrastructure Improvement Plans or this Agreement in any material respect, they shall immediately notify RCP and Bliss Sports II in writing stating the alleged deficiency and the City, the Quality Control Manager, the Architect, RCP and Bliss Sports II will meet within seven (7) days of the giving of such notice to discuss whether the Infrastructure Improvements are not being constructed in accordance with the Infrastructure Improvement Plans or this Agreement in any material respect and, if the City, RCP and Architect agree that they are not, then RCP shall cause Bliss Sports II to correct such deficiencies. The failure by the City to provide any notice of any observed deficiency shall not give rise to any liability to the City and shall not be considered a waiver of any right of the City under this Agreement, including, without limitation, the enforcement of the representations and warranties of Bliss Sports II under this Agreement and any warranties that may be made to the City by any Contracting Parties under the Infrastructure Construction Contract Documents with respect to the completion of the Infrastructure Improvements in accordance with the Infrastructure Improvement Plans and the Project Timeline.

  • Indemnity Limitation for TIPS Sales Texas and other jurisdictions restrict the ability of governmental entities to indemnify others. Vendor agrees that if any "Indemnity" provision which requires the TIPS Member to indemnify Vendor is included in any TIPS sales agreement/contract between Vendor and a TIPS Member, that clause must either be stricken or qualified by including that such indemnity is only permitted, "to the extent permitted by the laws and constitution of [TIPS Member's State]” unless the TIPS Member expressly agrees otherwise. Any TIPS Sale Supplemental Agreement containing an "Indemnity" clause that conflicts with these terms is rendered void and unenforceable.

  • Extent of Return or Disposition Return or Disposition is partial. The categories of data to be disposed of are set forth below or are found in an attachment to this Directive: Return or Disposition is Complete. Disposition extends to all categories of data.