Jurisdictional Differences Clause Samples
The Jurisdictional Differences clause defines how the agreement addresses variations in laws and regulations across different legal jurisdictions. It typically outlines which jurisdiction’s laws will govern the contract or specifies how the parties will handle conflicts arising from differing local requirements. For example, it may state that certain terms are only applicable in specific countries or that the agreement will be interpreted according to the laws of a designated state. This clause ensures clarity and predictability for both parties by preemptively resolving potential legal conflicts that could arise from operating in multiple regions.
Jurisdictional Differences. The Company will advise the Union, prior to implementation, of the assignment of existing or new positions to management or out of scope where those positions may bear on the Union's jurisdiction. The parties mutually agree that the resolution of differences arising from the jurisdictional allocation of positions will be processed in accordance with the Dispute Resolution Process outlined in Article 14 of this Agreement. If, however, a jurisdictional difference is not resolved by the parties and the Union elects to refer the matter to a third party, the dispute will be referred to the Labour Relations Board for a final and binding decision.
Jurisdictional Differences. The parties agree that differences regarding the jurisdictional allocation of employees and/or vacant positions will be processed in accordance with the following procedure. If however, a jurisdictional dispute is not resolved by the parties and the Union elects to refer the matter to a third party, it is agreed that the dispute will be referred to the Labour Relations Board for determination.
2.02.01 Management Initiated Reviews
1) Where the City is of the view that the work being performed by a CUPE Local 30 member is properly out of the scope of the bargaining unit certificate or is covered by another certificate and should be moved to a different bargaining unit, it will contact the Union to arrange a meeting to discuss the issue. During the meeting, the City will share relevant information concerning the basis for the exclusion from the bargaining unit, or the transfer to a different bargaining unit.
2) If the City is of the view that the work being performed by a CUPE Local 30 member should properly fall within the jurisdiction of another bargaining unit, then the City will invite the Union certified to represent that unit to the meeting with CUPE Local 30 as described in clause 2.02.01(1).
Jurisdictional Differences. The Company will advise the Union, prior to implementation, of the assignment of existing or new positions to management or out of scope where those positions may bear on the Union's jurisdiction. The parties mutually agree that the resolution of differences arising from the jurisdictional allocation of positions will be processed in accordance with the Dispute Resolution Process outlined in Article 14 of this Agreement. If, however, a jurisdictional difference is not resolved by the parties and the Union elects to refer the matter to a third party, the dispute will be referred to the Labour Relations Board for a final and binding decision. 20. Training Program for Equipment Operators
20.01. Employees wishing to receive training as equipment operators will be required to make application for training. A training bulletin will be placed on bulletin boards and/or provided directly to the appropriate employees, as required, requesting employees interested in taking training to signify their interest.
20.02. The Company will be responsible for establishing suitable training programs to meet the needs of each of the subsidiary companies.
20.03. The training courses may include the following: (1.) Classroom Training (2.) Equipment Familiarization (3.) Field Instruction (Operating time with or without a trainer present) The training courses will ensure that each operator will have the capacity to operate the equipment in a safe, efficient manner.
20.04. Employees taking training will be required to pass an examination upon completion of their training and show demonstrated ability to operate the required equipment. The nature and content of the examination will be reviewed with the Union prior to the examination being finalized.
20.05. Employees not successfully completing their training will be excluded from appointment to the operator class being trained for. Such employees will have the right to re-enroll for additional training in subsequent training programs.
20.06. Employees who are unsuccessful in passing training examinations on three (3) successive occasions will not be considered for further training on that type of equipment.
Jurisdictional Differences. The parties agree that differences regarding the jurisdictional allocation of employees and/or vacant positions will be processed in accordance with the following procedure. If however, a jurisdictional dispute is not resolved by the parties and the Union elects to refer the matter to a third party, it is agreed that the dispute will be referred to the Labour Relations Board for determination.