Jurisdictional boundaries Sample Clauses

Jurisdictional boundaries. For the purposes of automatic Emergency Services pursuant to this Agreement, the Parties’ jurisdictional boundaries shall not be a consideration in the provisions of Emergency Services. The closest available resource(s) and personnel shall be dispatched to an incident regardless of the jurisdiction in which the incident occurs. All necessary authorities and laws associated with emergency response are delegated to the closest responding agency as necessary to perform emergency functions.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Jurisdictional boundaries. Existing jurisdictional boundaries may be helpful in articulating a boundary for purposes of nonattainment designations, and for purposes of carrying out the governmental responsibilities of planning for attainment of the lead NAAQS and implementing control measures. These existing boundaries may include an existing nonattainment or maintenance area boundary, a county or township boundary, a metropolitan area boundary, an air management district, or an urban planning boundary established for coordinating business development or transportation activities. In EPA’s August 21, 2009 guidance memorandum, “Area Designations for the 2008 revised Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standard,” EPA reiterated that the presumptive boundary for each nonattainment area should be the county containing the violating monitor. This concept was first introduced in the guidance for the 1978 lead NAAQS designations, and is described in the 1992 General Preamble (57 FR 13549). This same presumptive boundary guidance was addressed most recently in the final rulemaking for the 2008 lead NAAQS (73 FR 66964). EPA observed, however, that States have the flexibility in their recommendations to deviate from the presumptive county boundary to portions of the county containing the violating monitor, stating that any “nonattainment area boundaries that deviate from presumptive county boundaries should be supported by an assessment of several factors…,” all of which have been discussed already in this document, except for jurisdictional boundaries. The State recommended nonattainment area is completely enclosed by the city of Chicago and Xxxx County. The Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning is responsible for transportation infrastructure, land use, and long term economical development for Xxxx County, and IEPA is responsible for all air quality regulatory programs in every county in the State.. As a result, air quality planning efforts to address the impending lead nonattainment area in Chicago should not be problematic. It should be noted that the final rulemaking for the 2008 lead NAAQS (73 FR 66964) specifically addressed transportation conformity by stating, “In light of the elimination of lead additives from gasoline, transportation conformity does not apply to the Lead NAAQS.” The State recommended boundaries for the Chicago nonattainment area are comprised of well- known streets and thoroughfares.
Sample 1
Jurisdictional boundaries. Section 1. Job Assignments. The Company will assign employees to duties in accordance with Article XIV, Section 3.
Sample 1
Jurisdictional boundaries. Existing jurisdictional boundaries may be helpful in articulating a boundary for purposes of nonattainment designations, and for purposes of carrying out the governmental responsibilities of planning for attainment of the lead NAAQS and implementing control measures. These existing boundaries may include an existing nonattainment or maintenance area boundary, a county or township boundary, a metropolitan area boundary, an air management district, or an urban planning boundary established for coordinating business development or transportation activities. The nonattainment area is a portion of Collin County. Surrounding counties have no lead emitting sources, and thus do not contribute to the nonattainment area in Collin County. TCEQ modeling shows that all predicted NAAQS violations fall within Collin County.
Sample 1
Jurisdictional boundaries. EPA provided information about all boundaries considered prior to proposing nonattainment areas and this information can be found in the Pennsylvania TSD as part of the docket on proposed designations (78 FR 11124) and is not restated here. EPA originally proposed including all of Allegheny County in the initial nonattainment area. However additional information provided by the Commonwealth and ACHD in response to EPA’s proposal demonstrates that the monitors and sources of concern within Allegheny County are only a portion of the county. However EPA noted that the area of the county suggested for inclusion by the Commonwealth and ACHD as part of the Allegheny PA Nonattainment Area did not include potions of the county where the Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx Works was located. EPA feels this source is impacting SO2 values in the county and has also included this portion of the county in the initial nonattainment area. Therefore, EPA is designating the portions of Allegheny County as identified in Table 1 as nonattainment.
Sample 1

Related to Jurisdictional boundaries

  • FEDERAL JURISDICTIONAL AREAS 33.1. Article 1, § 8, Clause 17 of the United States Constitution provides the authority to Congress to exercise exclusive jurisdiction over areas and structures used for military purposes (Federal Enclaves). Thus, Telecommunications Services to such Federal Enclaves are not subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission. The Parties agree that Services provided within Federal Enclaves are not within the scope of this Agreement. To the extent Sprint has contracts with federal entities that limit or prohibit the ability of CLEC to provide resale or UNEs such contract will govern Telecommunications Services on such Federal Enclave. If the contract with the federal entity provides for the resale or provision of UNEs to provide service on the Federal Enclave, Sprint will provide CLEC with the information regarding the provision of service on the Federal Enclave.

  • Boundaries All of the improvements which were included in determining the appraised value of the Property lie wholly within the boundaries and building restriction lines of the Property, and no improvements on adjoining properties encroach upon the Property, and no easements or other encumbrances upon the Property encroach upon any of the Improvements, so as to affect the value or marketability of the Property except those which are insured against by the Title Insurance Policy.

  • Jurisdiction, Etc (a) Each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably and unconditionally submits, for itself and its property, to the nonexclusive jurisdiction of any New York State court or federal court of the United States of America sitting in New York City, and any appellate court from any thereof, in any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement or the Notes, or for recognition or enforcement of any judgment, and each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably and unconditionally agrees that all claims in respect of any such action or proceeding may be heard and determined in any such New York State court or, to the extent permitted by law, in such federal court. Each of the parties hereto agrees that a final judgment in any such action or proceeding shall be conclusive and may be enforced in other jurisdictions by suit on the judgment or in any other manner provided by law. Nothing in this Agreement shall affect any right that any party may otherwise have to bring any action or proceeding relating to this Agreement or the Notes in the courts of any jurisdiction.

  • WORK JURISDICTION Par. 1. It is agreed by the parties to this Agreement that all work specified in Article IV shall be performed exclusively by Elevator Constructor Mechanics, Elevator Constructor Helpers, Elevator Constructor Apprentices and Elevator Constructor Assistant Mechanics in the employ of the Company.

  • Non-Jurisdictional Entities LIPA and NYPA do not waive their exemptions, pursuant to Section 201(f) of the FPA, from Commission jurisdiction with respect to the Commission’s exercise of the FPA’s general ratemaking authority.

  • Jurisdictional Disputes 17.01 A xxxx-up meeting will be held with each Contractor not later than the commencement of the Contractor's work on all projects and no assignments shall be made before this xxxx- up. Xxxx-up assignments shall also apply to all sub-contractors. If a jurisdictional dispute arises once the work has commenced, assignments will be made in accordance with procedures, rules and regulations of the National Joint Board Building Trades Department, A.F.L. & C.I.O. The work assignment shall not be completed until a meeting on site has been convened with all Parties involved and until a subsequent meeting (not later than twenty-four (24) hours) has taken place, at which the Contractor shall present the work assignment on paper to all Parties.

  • TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION The Territorial Jurisdiction of this Collective Agreement is the whole area within the boundaries of the Province of Ontario.

  • Jurisdiction; Venue In the event that any action is brought to enforce any provision of this Master Contract, the parties agree to exclusive jurisdiction in Xxxxxxxx County Superior Court for the State of Washington and agree that in any such action venue shall lie exclusively at Olympia, Washington.

  • Arbitrator's Jurisdiction The jurisdiction and authority of the arbitrator and his opinion and award shall be confined exclusively to the interpretation and/or application of the provision(s) of this Agreement at issue between the Union and the Administration. The arbitrator shall have no authority to add to, detract from, alter, amend, or modify any provision of this Agreement; to impose on either party a limitation or obligation not explicitly provided for in this Agreement; or to establish or alter any wage rate or wage structure. The arbitrator shall not hear or decide more than one grievance without the mutual consent of the Administration and the Union. The written award of the arbitrator on the merits of any grievance adjudicated within his jurisdiction and authority shall be final and binding on the aggrieved employee, the Union and the Administration, unless either party contests it before a court of competent jurisdiction as permitted by state law.

  • Jurisdiction and Process In any action between or among any of the parties, whether arising out of this Agreement or otherwise, (a) each of the parties irrevocably consents to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the federal and state courts located in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, (b) if any such action is commenced in a state court, then, subject to applicable law, no party shall object to the removal of such action to any federal court located in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, (c) each of the parties irrevocably waives the right to trial by jury, and (d) each of the parties irrevocably consents to service of process by first class certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, to the address at which such party is to receive notice in accordance with Section 12.5, and the prevailing parties shall be entitled to recover their reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs from the other parties.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.