Interagency Agreements e. Expired contracts subject to the exception at Section G of this memorandum.
Interagency Agreements. 1.1 Both Parties will endeavour to provide opportunities for the other Party to provide input to or involvement in interagency initiatives with other organizations that impact the activities of the other Party within the local trust area/electoral area.
Interagency Agreements. The World Health Organization agrees to inform the Council of any for- mal agreement between the Organization and any other specialized agency, intergovernmental organization or non-governmental organization and in particular agrees to inform the Council of the nature and scope of any such agreement before it is concluded.
Interagency Agreements. The Army and EPA are encouraged to enter into interagency agreements with other federal, state, tribal and local agencies which will provide assistance to the Corps and EPA in pursuit of Section 404 enforcement activities. For example, the preliminary enforcement site investigations or post-case monitoring activities required to ensure compliance with any enforcement order can be delegated to third parties (e.g., FWS) who agree to assist Corps/EPA in compliance efforts. However, only the Corps or EPA may make a violation determination and/or pursue an appropriate enforcement response based upon information received from a third party.
Interagency Agreements. Federal facilities are required to enter into an interagency agreement (IAG) or a federal facility agreement (FFA) within 180 days of completion of the remedial investigation and feasibility study (RI/FS) at a National Priorities List (NPL) installation, per the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act provisions codified as Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) §120(e)(2). The IAG outlines the responsibilities of the Military Component(s), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and frequently, the state in the cleanup process. The IAG allows EPA and states to assume regulatory oversight over environmental restoration activities at DoD installations. CERCLA §120(e)(5) requires that (1) the number of IAGs and FFAs signed and in negotiation; (2) the costs associated with IAGs; (3) public comments; and (4) IAG and FFA developments within the previous fiscal year be reported in the Annual Report to Congress. The information provided in this appendix is for Fiscal Year 2000 (FY00). The three IAGs signed in FY00 (Table C-1) bring the total number of DoD IAGs to 114. Table C-2 lists all installations that conducted negotiations or signed IAGs or FFAs in FY00. Other information required to be reported by CERCLA §120(e)(5) is provided as follows: Cost estimates and budgetary proposals for IAGs: Table B-1 provides
Interagency Agreements. Federal facilities on the National Priorities List (NPL) are required to enter into an interagency agreement (IAG) or a federal facility agreement (FFA) within 180 days of completion of the remedial investigation and feasibility study (RI/FS), per the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act provisions codified as Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) §120(e)(2). The IAG outlines the responsibilities of the Military Component(s), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and, frequently, the state in the cleanup process. It allows EPA and states to assume regulatory oversight over environmental restoration activities at DoD installations. CERCLA §120(e)(5) requires that the number of IAGs and FFAs signed and in negotiation, the costs associated with IAGs, public comments, and IAG and FFA developments within the previous fiscal year be reported in the DERP Annual Report to Congress. The information provided in this appendix is for Fiscal Year 2001 (FY01). The three IAGs signed in FY01 (Table D-1) bring the total number of DoD IAGs to 117. Table D-2 lists all installations that conducted negotiations or Table D-1 TOC IAG/FFA Status Summary Component IAGs/FFAs Signed in FY01 IAGs/FFAs in Negotiation in FY01 Navy 3 5 Air Force 0 5 Total 3 14 signed IAGs or FFAs in FY01 and provides additional information on IAGs and FFAs that are under negotiation or were not concluded within the required time frame. Other information that must be reported according to CERCLA §120(e)(5) is provided as follows Cost estimates and budgetary proposals for IAGs: Table B-1 provides (1) information on environmental restoration costs that each DoD installation has incurred through FY01 and (2) estimates of each installation’s costs from FY02 through completion. Public comments regarding proposed IAGs: The public did not submit comments on IAGs to DoD during FY01. Installation Name IAG/FFA Status (signed or negotiated) Description of Cases in Which Negotiations Are Under Way or No Agreement Was Reached Within 180 days of Completion of the RI/FS ARMY Fort Eustis Negotiations ongoing The RI/FS is not complete, and a Record of Decision (ROD) has not been prepared. FFA negotiations between Army and EPA are considered ongoing until the FS is complete. Fort Xxxxx Negotiations ongoing A portion of Fort Xxxxx (Xxxxxx Army Airfield) was deleted from the NPL. The Fort Xxxxx partnering team is working on a site management plan as well as a draft...
Interagency Agreements. The Adminis- trator and the Secretary of Energy are authorized to enter into interagency agreements with one another for the purpose of providing for research, evaluation, testing, development, and demonstration into alter- native or innovative technologies to characterize and assess the nature and extent of hazardous waste (in- cluding radioactive mixed waste) contamination at the Hanford site, in the State of Washington.
Interagency Agreements. A. In response to requests from the NRC for USACE assistance under this MOU, USACE and the NRC shall execute mutually agreed-upon IAs written on Engineer Form 4914-R. NRC Form 662 is the equivalent to Engineer Form 4914-R and Defense Form 1144. IAs must include: - a detailed scope of work statement - delivery schedules - funding and billing arrangements - the amount of funds required and available to accomplish the scope of work as stated above - the NRC’s fund citation and the date upon which the cited funds expire for obligation purposes
Interagency Agreements. DelDOT may enter into agreements with neighboring States, or other State of Delaware Agencies and County Agencies. These agreements can describe land acquisitions, the design process, stipulations on how construction is to be performed, or financial arrangements between parties. Each agreement is different and will provide information that may affect the Construction or Right-of-Way plans. Normally these agreements would reside in the project files with the DelDOT Practitioner that is responsible for the project or with the DelDOT Legal Section.
Interagency Agreements a. In response to requests from one party (the "Ordering Agency") for the other party's (the "Servicing Agency") goods and services, the parties will develop mutually agreed upon written IAs that detail the specific tasks to be completed. Those IAs must be on either Engineer Form 4914-R or a similar document containing the same information as Department of Defense Form 1144. IAs must include: ● a detailed scope of work statement; ● schedules; ● funding arrangements, including, for IAs in excess of $1 million, the amount of any advance payment; ● the amount of funds required and available to accomplish the scope of work; ● the Ordering Agency's appropriation symbol (funds cite) and the date upon which the cited funds expire for obligation purposes; ● the names of individual project managers; ● the types of contracts to be used (if known); ● the types and frequencies of reports; ● identification of which party is to be responsible for government-furnished equipment; contract administration; records maintenance; rights to data, software, and intellectual property; and contract audits; ● procedures for amending or modifying the IA; and ● other information needed to describe clearly the obligations of the parties. ● The Ordering Agency's order number, the Dun & Bradstreet Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number for the Ordering Agency's location, the Servicing Agency's cite location DUNS number and Servicing Agency's appropriation symbol or funds citation for collection. Since the DoD does not use DUNS numbers, the Corps may use its DoDAAC numbers to fulfill its requirements hereunder. ● statement that studies conducted under this agreement may be distributed, to the extent permissible by Article XI(c) of this MOA, to the scientific and resource management community through reports, scientific publications, and/or student thesis or dissertation, and through presentations to appropriate scientific and forums.
