Independent Evaluator. At the beginning of the demonstration period, the state must acquire an independent party to conduct an evaluation of the demonstration to ensure that the necessary data is collected at the level of detail needed to research the approved hypotheses. The independent party must sign an agreement to conduct the demonstration evaluation in accord with the CMS-approved, draft evaluation plan. For scientific integrity, every effort should be made to follow the approved methodology, but requests for changes may be made in advance of running any data or due to mid-course changes in the operation of the demonstration.
Independent Evaluator. At the beginning of the demonstration period, the state must acquire an independent party to conduct an evaluation of the demonstration to ensure that the necessary data is collected at the level of detail needed to research the approved hypotheses. The independent party must sign an agreement to conduct the demonstration evaluation in accord with the CMS-approved, draft evaluation plan. For scientific integrity, every effort should be made to follow the approved methodology, but requests for changes may be made in advance of running any data or due to mid- course changes in the operation of the demonstration. Evaluation Design and Implementation. The State must submit a draft updated evaluation design for MassHealth 1115 demonstration to CMS no later than June 30, 2018. Such revisions to the evaluation design and the STCs shall not affect previously established timelines for report submission for the insert old demo name, if applicable. The state must submit a final evaluation design within 60 days after receipt of CMS’ comments. Upon CMS approval of the evaluation design, the state must implement the evaluation design and submit their evaluation implementation progress in each of the quarterly and annual progress reports, including the rapid cycle assessments as outlined in the Monitoring Section of these STCs. The final evaluation design will be included as an attachment to the STCs. Per 42 CFR 431.424(c), the state will publish the approved evaluation design within 30 days of CMS approval. The state must implement the evaluation design and submit their evaluation implementation progress in each of the Quarterly and Annual Reports as outlined in STC 81.
Independent Evaluator. Lessor shall permit Lessee’s representatives to participate in Lessor’s regularly scheduled design, construction and start-up progress meetings. Such meetings shall take place starting on the Construction Effective Date and shall occur no less than once every thirty (30) days and shall continue throughout the Construction Term.
Independent Evaluator. As discussed above, the IE, Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx of Xxxxxx Seco Consulting, participated in the negotiation’s material discussions and communications, evaluated the PPA, and concluded that the PPA merits Commission approval. Appendix H includes the public portion of the IE’s report and Appendix C includes confidential information.
Independent Evaluator. The Recipient shall securely transmit these data to support evaluation, on a schedule and using a medium agreed upon with the Independent Evaluator, to the Independent Evaluator’s location. Data collected for use by the Independent Evaluator shall be considered “owned” by the USDOT. The Recipient shall transmit only those data required to support evaluation by the Independent Evaluator; any additional data that the site collects for its own use shall also be stored in its own secure data storage system, but kept separate from data required by the Independent Evaluator and the USDOT. However, the Recipient may use data collected for the Independent Evaluator in its own analyses.” The Contractor shall closely coordinate with Smart Columbus to both inform and understand their Performance Measurement and Evaluation Support Plans, ensuring that their plans are sound, reasonable and executable. The Contractor shall provide technical assistance and expertise as required by the TOCOR. The Contractor shall also work closely with the Smart Columbus team to ensure that IE needs are accommodated in the Performance Measurement and Evaluation Support Plans. Per the direction of the TOCOR, the Contractor may be asked to participate in Smart Columbus Performance Measurement and Evaluation Roundtable Meetings and/or be tasked with reviewing Smart Columbus’ Performance Measurement and Evaluation Support Plans. The Contractor shall work with the Smart Columbus team to support initial data collection and baselining efforts, as appropriate, to conduct initial evaluation planning activities, and conduct any necessary/desired meetings, interviews and surveys, if requested.
Independent Evaluator. The Independent Evaluator (“IE”) for this PPA is Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx of Xxxxxx Seco Consulting. The IE participated in the negotiation’s material discussions and communications, evaluated the PPA, and concluded that the PPA merits CPUC approval. Any findings of the IE to the PRG regarding the application solicitation, the project bid, and/or contract negotiations are contained in Confidential Appendix C and Public Appendix H.
Independent Evaluator. Subcontractors Independent Evaluator shall require each agreement with Subcontractors, other than those that are public entities, providing Services in connection with this Agreement, to include insurance requirements substantially similar to the following:
Independent Evaluator. Indicate and describe the process the state will follow to acquire an independent entity or entities to conduct the evaluation (either a competitive procurement or those with an existing contractual relationship with the state). Include the timeframe for the independent evaluator to begin and complete the evaluation work. APPENDIX C: Approved Evaluation Design
Independent Evaluator. An independent third-party, appointed in accordance with Section 2.08, to review breaches of representations and warranties as provided in Section 2.05.
Independent Evaluator. As discussed above, the IE, Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx from Xxxxxx Seco Consulting, evaluated the PPA and concluded that the PPA merits CPUC approval. Please also refer to Appendix H for the public portion of the Independent Evaluator’s report on the PPA and Appendix C for the confidential appendix to that report. Any findings of the IE to the PRG regarding the project/bid, and/or contract negotiations are contained in those appendices and in Confidential Appendix A. III. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT STATUS
