In Re. Xxxxx Xxx Xxxxxxx, Xx. 00-00000 (Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Ohio). Creditor challenging legacy structured settlement order in annuitant’s Chapter 7 Bankruptcy proceeding.
In Re. Yasmin and YAZ (Drospirenone) Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2100 (the “MDL”), a federal multi-district litigation venued in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois (the “MDL Court”); (2) any other federal court proceedings pertaining to actions, disputes, and claims asserted against Defendants regarding the use of drospirenone- containing oral contraceptives manufactured by Bayer or manufactured or marketed by BarrTeva (collectively, “DCOCs”), either pending in that court or removed therefrom and awaiting transfer to the MDL (collectively, the “Other Federal Court Proceedings”), and (3) In re Yaz, Yasmin and Ocella Contraceptive Cases, Case No. JCCP 4608 (Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles) (the “California Coordinated Proceedings”), In RE: Yaz/Yasmin/Ocella Litigation, BER-L-3572-10 (Superior Court, Law Division, Bergen County) (the “New Jersey Coordinated Proceedings”), and In re: Yaz/Yasmin/Ocella/Gianvi Products Liability Litigation, September Term, 2009. No 1307 (Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, Trial Division-Civil) (the “Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Coordinated Proceeding”) pending in their respective courts (collectively, the “State Coordinating Courts”). The Gallbladder Resolution Program established pursuant to this Settlement Agreement also is open to Claimants in any and all other state court proceedings pertaining to actions, disputes, and claims asserted against Defendants regarding the use of DCOCs (together with the cases pending in the State Coordinating Courts, the “State Court Proceedings”).
In Re. NuvaRing Litigation, BER-L-3081-09 (the “New Jersey Coordinated Proceedings”), venued in the New Jersey Superior Court, Law Division, Bergen County (the “New Jersey Coordinated Court”); and (4) any and all other state court proceedings pertaining to actions, disputes, and claims asserted against Defendants regarding the use of NuvaRing (the “Other State Court Proceedings”).
In Re. Actos (Pioglitazone) Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2299 (the “MDL”), a federal multi- district litigation venued in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana (the “MDL Court”); (2) any other federal court proceedings, either pending in that court or awaiting transfer to the MDL (collectively, the “Other Federal Court Proceedings”); (3) In re Actos Related Cases, No. 2011 L 010011 (the “Illinois Coordinated Proceedings”), venued in the Circuit Court of Xxxx County, Illinois, County Department, Law Division (the “Illinois Coordinated Court”); (4) In Re Actos Product Liability Cases Coordinated Proceeding, JCCP No. 4696 (the “California Coordinated Proceedings”), venued in the California Superior Court, Los Angeles County, California (the “California Coordinated Court”); and (5) any and all other state court proceedings (the “Other State Court Proceedings”).
In Re. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, No. 1:15-bk-02164 (Bankr. M.D. Tenn.)
In Re. Rust-Oleum Restore Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litig., No. 1:15-cv-01364 (N.D. Ill.); In re: Sears, Xxxxxxx and Co. Front-Loader Washer Products Liability Litig., No. 1:06-cv-07023 (N.D. Ill.); Xxxxx x. Xxxxxx Nutrition International, Inc., No. 3:11-CV-01056 (S.D. Cal.); Xxxx v.
In Re. Power Purchase Agreement between Duke Energy Progress, LLC and Xxxxxx Solar, LLC ) ) ) ) ) ) PROPOSED ORDER RULING ON REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIALITY This matter comes before the Public Service Commission of South Carolina (“Commission”) upon the filing of an amendment to a Power Purchase Agreement (“PPA”) between Duke Energy Progress, LLC (“DEP” or the “Company”) and Xxxxxx Solar, LLC (“Xxxxxx Solar”) with the Commission (“October 5 Filing”). The amendment revised the PPA previously accepted for filing by the Commission in Order No. 2016-146 (“Amendment”). In the October 5 Filing, DEP submitted a request for confidential treatment due to the commercially sensitive and proprietary nature of certain portions of the Amendment. DEP included with the October 5 Filing a redacted version of the Amendment illustrating the portions for which confidentiality was sought. On October 24, 2017, the Office of Regulatory Staff (“ORS”) filed a letter objecting to DEP’s confidentiality request, noting that certain headers, column labels, and definitions were redacted, and requested that the Commission deny the Company’s request unless and until the Company demonstrated why the redacted provisions are confidential. On December 1, 2017, DEP filed a revised Amendment with fewer redactions along with a memorandum supporting its request for confidential treatment. On December 5, 2017, ORS filed a letter maintaining its objection to DEP’s confidentiality ELECTRONICALLY FILED - 2018 February 26 3:26 PM - SCPSC - Docket # 2016-42-E - Page 2 of 8 request. On December 8, 2017, the standing hearing officer issued a directive indicating that the Commission would rule on DEP’s request for confidentiality in its December 20, 2017 business meeting and instructing the parties to file any further briefs by December 13, 2017. DEP filed a brief on December 13, 2017, and, on December 20, 2017, the Commission issued a directive requiring that the Amendment remain sealed and instructed Commission staff to schedule an oral argument as to the redacted documents. An oral argument was held on February 6, 2018. For the reasons stated herein, we accept the Amendment to the PPA for filing and grant DEP’s request to treat the Amendment as confidential. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
In Re. DEPARTMENT OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES…OHIO DEPARTMENT OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES (ODJFS) TITLE IV-E CHILD PLACEMENT AGREEMENT AND ADDENDUM THERETO, CONSISTING OF AMENDMENT NUMBERS 1 THROUGH 3, WITH TRI- STATE YOUTH AUTHORITY, INC. (D.B.A. MOCHICAN YOUTH ACADEMY) FOR THE PROVISION OF RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT SERVICES FOR SAME…00-0000-000… Recommendation of Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, Director, Department of Job and Family Services, with the concurrence of Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx, Assistant County Administrator, to authorize Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, Director, Department of Job and Family Services, to execute an Ohio Department of Job and Family Services (ODJFS) Title IV-E Child Placement Agreement and Addendum Thereto, Consisting of Amendment Numbers 1 through 3, by and between the County of Clermont, Ohio, and Tri-State Youth Authority, Inc. (d.b.a. Mohican Youth Academy), 1012 ODNR Mohican 00, Xxxxxxxxxxx, Xxxx 00000, for the provision of residential treatment services for children referred by the Department of Job and Family Services and/or Clermont County Juvenile Court, at the rate of $226.00 per diem/per child as identified therein, effective 07/01/17 through 06/30/18, pursuant to and in compliance with the terms and conditions specified therein and contingent upon the issuance and receipt of a current Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation Certificate and purchase order therefore.
In Re. DEPARTMENT OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES/DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT…IV-D CONTRACT WITH CLERMONT COUNTY JUVENILE COURT FOR THE PURCHASE OF SERVICES FOR SAME…00-0000-000…
In Re. INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT/THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS DIVISION…ELECTRONIC SUBSCRIPTION FOR SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE UPDATES AND SUPPORT FOR SAME…00-0000-000… Recommendation of Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Director, Information Systems Department, with the concurrence of Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx, County Administrator, to acquire additional licenses relative to a current electronic subscription for the provision of software and hardware updates and support at the not to exceed estimated rates and the terms outlined below and as set forth in the standard terms and conditions therefore, all of which are on file in Information Systems Department/The Telecommunications Division, and to authorize the County Auditor to remit payment accordingly, pursuant to and in compliance with the allocated funds therefore as set forth in the Annual Appropriations for Calendar Year 2017: Vendor Software Not to Exceed Estimated Rate Term The Telecommunications Division
