Hughes Sample Clauses

Hughes. Hughes hereby represents and warrants that (i) it has examined (or will upon receipt examine) (A) the Ruling and any other rulings issued by the IRS in connection with the Split-Off, (B) the Tax Opinions, (C) each IRS Submission, (D) the representation letters relating to the Tax Opinions and (E) any other materials delivered or deliverable by GM and others in connection with the rendering by Tax Counsel of the Tax Opinions and the issuance by the IRS of the Ruling and such other rulings (all of the foregoing, collectively, the "Tax Materials") and (ii) the facts presented and the representations made therein, to the extent descriptive of Hughes (including the business purposes for the Split-Off and the representations in the Tax Materials to the extent that they relate to Hughes and the plans, proposals, intentions and policies of Hughes), are, or will be from the time presented or made through and including the Split-Off Effective Time, true, correct and complete in all material respects. Except for the Tax Allocation Agreements, there are no Tax sharing agreements and practices regarding Taxes and their payment, allocation and sharing between any former subsidiary or affiliate of GM (other than Hughes or a Subsidiary of Hughes), on the one hand, and Hughes or any Subsidiary of Hughes, on the other hand.
Hughes. ORION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- HS601HP INTEGRATED TEST PLAN August 1996 /s/ ------------------------- Approved by HSC /s/ ------------------------- Approved by ORION HUGHES PROPRIETARY This document contains proprietary information, and except with written permission of Hughes Space and Communications Company, such information shall not be published, or disclosed to others, or used for any purpose and the document shall not be duplicated in whole or in part. Copyright 1996 Hughes Space and Communications Company Unpublished Work HUGHES PROPRIETARY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
Hughes. Hughes hereby represents and warrants that (i) it has examined the Tax Opinions/Rulings and the Representation Letters, and (ii) the facts presented and the representations made therein, to the extent descriptive of Hughes or the Hughes Business or Raytheon or the Raytheon Business (including, without limitation, the business purposes for the Hughes Spin-Off, Telecom Spin-Off and Hughes Merger, the representations in the Representation Letters and Tax Opinions/Rulings to the extent that they relate to Hughes or the Hughes Business or Raytheon or the Raytheon Business, and the plans, proposals, intentions and policies of Hughes or Raytheon), are true, correct and complete in all material respects.
Hughes. Richard Austen-Baker has suggested that the perpetuation of the idea of 'meeting of minds' may come from a misunderstanding of the Latin term 'consensus ad idem', which actually means 'agreement to the same thing'. There must be evidence that the parties had each from an objective perspective engaged in conduct manifesting their assent, and a contract will be formed when the parties have met such a requirement. An objective perspective means that it is only necessary that somebody gives the impression of offering or accepting contractual terms in the eyes of a reasonable person, not that they actually did want to form a contract. The case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company is an example of a 'unilateral contract'. Obligations are only imposed upon one party upon acceptance by performance of a condition, disambiguation needed. In the United States, the general rule is that in "case of doubt, an offer is interpreted as inviting the offeree to accept either by promising to perform what the offer requests or by rendering the performance, as the offeree chooses." Offer and acceptance does not always need to be expressed orally or in writing. An implied contract is one in which some of the terms are not expressed in words. This can take two forms. A contract which is implied in fact is one in which the circumstances imply that parties have reached an agreement even though they have not done so expressly. For example, by going to a doctor for a checkup, a patient agrees that he will pay a fair price for the service. If one refuses to pay after being examined, the patient has breached a contract implied in fact. A contract which is implied in law is also called a quasi-contract, because it is not in fact a contract; rather, it is a means for the courts to remedy situations in which one party would be unjustly enriched were he or she not required to compensate the other. For example, a plumber accidentally installs a sprinkler system in the lawn of the wrong house. The owner of the house had learned the previous day that his neighbor was getting new sprinklers. That morning, he sees the plumber installing them in his lawn. Pleased at the mistake, he says nothing, and then refuses to pay when the plumber delivers the bill. Will the man be held liable for payment? Yes, if it could be proven that the man knew that the sprinklers were being installed mistakenly, the court would make him pay because of a quasi-contract. If that knowledge could not be proven, he wo...
Hughes. [3] Richard Austen-Baker has suggested that the perpetuation of the idea of 'meeting of minds' may come from a misunderstanding of the Latin term 'consensus ad idem', which actually means 'agreement to the [same] thing'.[4] There must be evidence that the parties had each from an objective perspective engaged in conduct manifesting their assent, and a contract will be formed when the parties have met such a requirement.[5] An objective perspective means that it is only necessary that somebody gives the impression of offering or accepting contractual terms in the eyes of a reasonable person, not that they actually did want to form a contract.
Hughes. The parties acknowledge that existence of the claims by Borrower against Hughes Network Systems as further described on Exhibit F ("Hughes Case"). Borrower agrees that Company shall bear no liability in connection with the Hughes Case and agrees to indemnify and defend Company therefrom pursuant to Borrower's indemnification obligation set forth above. Company agrees that Borrower shall be entitled to any and all proceeds in connection with its claim against Hughes.
Hughes. As disclosed in the Existing Environmental Reports, the real property comprising the Project was formerly owned by Hughes Electronics Corporation (“Hughes”). Seller acquired the Project from Hughes pursuant to a certain Real Property Purchase and Sale Agreement and Escrow Instructions (“Hughes Agreement”). Certain releases of Hazardous Materials occurred on the Project as a result of the former operations conducted on the Project by Hughes and/or Hughes’ predecessors. Hughes contracted with Hargis & Associates, Inc. (“Hargis”) to conduct both soil and groundwater investigations at the Project. The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (the “DTSC”) oversaw the investigations and remediations conducted by Hughes. Groundwater remediation related to an area referred to in the Existing Environmental Reports as SWMU-2 is ongoing and consists of groundwater extraction through wells accessed from time to time for measurement and sampling and treatment by charcoal adsorption. The DTSC is continuing to oversee this matter. SWMU-2 and the groundwater wells and remediation and treatment system are located outside of the Real Property at the locations shown on Exhibit “J” attached hereto (the “Hughes Wells”). Pursuant to the Hughes Agreement, Hughes retains the right to access the Project, to conduct the SWMU-2 groundwater monitoring and remediation and to conduct such other environmental investigation and undertake and complete such other cleanup, remediation or other actions as may be necessary under any action plans Hughes develops for the Project. Hughes’ entry rights to the Project are conditioned on Hughes providing to Seller (a) reasonable advance notice of the entry, (b) reasonable evidence of the existence of reasonable and customary commercial general liability insurance covering Hughes and Hughes’ contractor’s operations in connection with such entry (or, in the alternative, reasonable evidence that Hughes is providing equivalent self insurance coverage), and (c) a reasonably detailed written scope of work covering the intended activities. Hughes is also obliged to exercise Hughes’ reasonable best efforts to avoid unreasonably interfering with the activities and operations on the Project. At the Closing, Purchaser shall acquire the Real Property subject to the Hughes Agreement, including, but not limited to, the access provisions of the Hughes Agreement described above; provided, however, Seller hereby represents and warrants to Purchaser that to...

Related to Hughes

Campbell Telecopy: (410) 659-2701 if to Spinco: Abacus Innovations Corporation Telecopy: with a copy (which shall not constitute notice) to: Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP One Rodney Square 920 N. King Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Attention: Robert B. Pincus, Esq. Telecopy: (302) 434-3090 or to such other address or telecopy number and with such other copies, as such Party may hereafter specify for that purpose by notice to the other Party. Each such notice, request or other communication shall be effective (a) on the day delivered (or if that day is not a Business Day, on the first following day that is a Business Day) when (i) delivered personally against receipt or (ii) sent by overnight courier, (b) on the day when transmittal confirmation is received if sent by telecopy (or if that day is not a Business Day, on the first following day that is a Business Day), and (c) if given by any other means, upon delivery or refusal of delivery at the address specified in this Section 7.
Millwright The rest period provided for under Paragraph c) of this Subsection is eliminated to allow an employee to finish work 15 minutes earlier, or it may be worked and paid at the applicable wage rate.
Mitchell Hutchins obligation to pay compensation to PaineWebber as agreed upon pursuant to this paragraph 4 is not contingent upon receipt by Mitchell Hutchins of any compensation from the Fund or Series. Mitchell Hutchins shall advise the Board of any agreements or revised agreements as to compensation to be paid by Mitchell Hutchins to PaineWebber at their first regular meeting held after such agreement but shall not be required to obtain prior approval for such agreements from the Board.
Williams Shareholders signed only as to and limited to Sections 1, 2, 3, 9.2 and 10.7: --------------------------- ------------------------------------- Stephen A. Michael William W. Dolan, Trustee of the Spencer Charles Duffey Irrevocable Trust under Agreement dated the 29th day of July, 1998 --------------------------- ------------------------------------- William W. Dolan William W. Dolan, Trustee of the Elizabeth Charles Duffey Irrevocable Trust under Agreement dated the 29th day of July, 1998 /s/ SCOT LANCE --------------------------- ------------------------------------- Robert T. Roth Scot Lance --------------------------- ------------------------------------- Scott Tannehill Joseph F. Movizzo
AT&T 9STATE shall be defined as the States of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee.
Schneider Donald W. Schneider, Chairman Kathy Tripp /s/ Robert M. Sweeney -------------------------- ------------------------------- Robert M. Sweeney, Secretary
Manning 15.1 The Ship shall be competently and adequately manned so as to ensure its safe operation and the maintenance of a three-watch system whenever required and in no case manned at a lower level than in accordance with relevant and applicable international laws, rules and regulations.
Brant, Haldimand, Norfolk The Employer recognizes the Ontario Nurses’ Association as the bargaining agent for all Registered and Graduate Nurses engaged in a nursing capacity by Aberdeen Health and Community Services, Brant-Norfolk-Haldimand in the County of Brant and the Region of Haldimand-Norfolk save and except Supervisors and those persons above the rank of Supervisor.
Stratton CFO -------------------------- AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY 50 233 South Wacker Drive, Suite 2800 Chicago, Illinois 60606 Tel 312 234-2934 Fax 312 234-3160 NATIONSBANK CONFIRMATION FOR U.S. DOLLAR FLOOR SUBJECT TO EXISTING 1992 MASTER TO: SIRROM CAPITAL CORPORATION 500 CHURCH STREET, SUITE 200 NASHVILLE, TN 37219 ATTN: CARL STRATTON, CFO TEL: 615-256-0701 FAX: 615-726-1208 FROM: NationsBank, N.A. 233 S. Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606 MICHAEL SHARP / SEAN DOYLE DATE: 27NOV96 SUBJECT: Transaction Ref# 565260 The purpose of this letter agreement is to confirm the terms and conditions of the Rate Floor Transaction entered into between us on the Trade Date specified below (the "Floor Transaction"). This letter agreement constitutes a "Confirmation" as referred to in the Master Agreement specified below. The definitions and provisions contained in the 1991 ISDA Definitions (as published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.), (the "Definitions") are incorporated into this Confirmation. In the event of any inconsistency between the Definitions and this Confirmation, this Confirmation will govern.
BURNHAM 1l06.08:l Schedule 5 [Letterhead of Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy] To Each Person Listed on The Attached Schedule August 18, 1986 SALE AND LEASEBACK OF AN UNDIVIDED INTEREST IN PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNIT 2 AND CERTAIN COMMON FACILITIES Dear Sirs: We have acted as special New York counsel for Burnham Leasing Corporation, a New York corporation (the Owner Participant), in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Participation Agreement1 dated as of August 12, 1986, (the Participation Agreement), among the Owner Participant, The First National Bank of Boston, a national banking association, individually and a Owner Trustee, First PV Funding Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Chemical Bank, a New York banking corporation, as Indenture Trustee and Public Service Company 6f New Mexico, a New Mexico corporation. All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in Appendix A to the Participation Agreement. This opinion is being delivered pursuant to Section 11(a) (14) of the Participation Agreement. As such counsel we have examined originals or copies, certified or otherwise identified to our satisfaction, of such corporate records, agreements and other instruments, certificates; orders, opinions, correspondence with public officials, certificates of officers and representatives of the Owner Participant, and other documents, as we have deemed necessary or advisable for the purposes of rendering the opinions set forth herein. Based upon the foregoing, we are of opinion that: