Geographic Distribution. No more than 5.00% of the aggregate principal balance of the Receivables as of the Cutoff Date is attributable to Receivables with Obligors having a billing address in any single State other than California, Texas, New Jersey, Florida and New York which represent no more than 22.06%, 10.20%, 7.80%, 7.40% and 5.17%, respectively.
Geographic Distribution. Notwithstanding the foregoing: -----------------------
Geographic Distribution. No more than [___]% of the aggregate principal balance of the Receivables as of the Cutoff Date is attributable to Receivables with Obligors having a billing address in any single State other than [______], [_____] and [______] which represent no more than [___]%, [__]% and [__]%, respectively.
Geographic Distribution. Insurer shall not advertise outside its Service Area unless such advertising is unavoidable. For situations in which this is unavoidable, Insurer shall clearly disclose its Service Area. Insurer shall distribute any approved Marketing materials to its entire Service Area. In the event Insurer’s responsibility to provide culturally competent services and communications necessitates variations in Marketing materials among Regions in Insurer’s Service Area, Insurer may make those changes necessary for a particular Marketing material to fulfill its cultural competency obligations without being considered noncompliant with this requirement.
Geographic Distribution. Populations of Asclepias uncialis have been noted from the states of Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah, and Wyoming. Distribution of Asclepias uncialis in the United States (Kartesz and Xxxxxxx 2004). In the map above, dark green indicates the possible historical range of Asclepias uncialis. Red indicates populations that have probably been extirpated; bright green indicates the presence of known populations; yellow indicates known but rare populations (Kartesz and Xxxxxxx 2004). In Oklahoma, the plant is only definitely known from one location in Cimarron County. Distribution of Asclepias uncialis in Oklahoma (Xxxxxxxx et al. 2006)
Geographic Distribution. As of the Initial Cutoff Date [___]%, [___]%, [___]%, [___]%, [___]% and [___]% of the Receivables (based on principal balance and location of the applicable Dealer) were located in [___], [___], [___], [___], [____] and [___], respectively.
Geographic Distribution. As of the Cutoff Date, the overall percentage of the Principal Balance of Loans located in any one State (based on the Loan Obligor’s current mailing address in the Loan Seller’s records as of the related Cutoff Date) does not exceed the following concentration limits expressed as a percentage of the aggregate Principal Balance of the outstanding Loans: State Max. % of Aggregate Principal Balance Ohio 29.32% Indiana 13.06% Kentucky 12.77% Michigan 12.08% Pennsylvania 14.03% Each Other State 5.00%
Geographic Distribution. PRINCIPAL % OF PRINCIPAL REMAINING NUMBER OF BALANCE BALANCE AS OF TERM TO DEBT-TO- GROSS MORTGAGE AS OF THE THE CUT-OFF MATURITY INCOME COUPON OLTV STATE LOANS CUT-OFF DATE DATE (MONTHS) (%) (%) FICO (%) ------------------------ ----------- --------------- ---------------- ----------- -------- -------- ------ ------- CA 1,531 410,822,733.94 29.34 357 40.46 7.161 606 79.07 FL 778 118,971,483.30 8.50 356 39.46 7.634 610 84.78 NY 357 113,854,114.58 8.13 358 39.84 7.434 628 84.29 IL 583 104,840,496.40 7.49 358 39.66 7.636 615 86.52 AZ 385 49,080,701.54 3.51 355 37.48 7.623 611 87.06 NJ 205 48,805,792.78 3.49 355 37.73 7.453 623 84.24 TX 360 42,626,168.59 3.04 348 37.16 8.088 597 84.48 NV 208 42,209,832.77 3.01 358 39.78 7.666 601 82.50 MI 339 41,496,110.92 2.96 357 37.47 7.782 605 86.35 OH 407 41,080,150.54 2.93 356 37.58 7.658 600 87.39 MD 193 38,805,792.57 2.77 357 38.91 7.544 604 83.54 MA 153 38,196,577.01 2.73 358 39.71 7.385 620 83.90 CO 144 25,411,225.07 1.82 358 37.88 7.243 613 86.51 GA 171 24,649,245.37 1.76 355 36.26 7.705 615 86.65 HI 80 23,242,785.49 1.66 355 38.93 6.590 638 81.88 PA 168 22,541,575.27 1.61 350 38.47 7.506 603 84.35 MN 118 21,742,992.96 1.55 356 39.56 7.687 615 86.70 WA 112 21,085,997.62 1.51 357 38.71 7.389 610 84.30 CT 94 18,502,823.76 1.32 359 40.58 7.419 612 84.85 MO 130 13,442,542.67 0.96 356 37.64 7.818 603 86.56 Other 1,085 138,589,321.67 9.90 356 37.84 7.717 607 86.22 ------------------------ ----------- --------------- ---------------- ----------- ---------- -------- ------ ----- TOTAL: 7,601 1,399,998,464.82 100.00 357 39.21 7.462 610 83.43 ------------------------ ----------- --------------- ---------------- ----------- ---------- -------- ------ ----- PRINCIPAL % OF PRINCIPAL REMAINING NUMBER OF BALANCE BALANCE AS OF TERM TO DEBT-TO- GROSS OCCUPANCY MORTGAGE AS OF THE THE CUT-OFF MATURITY INCOME COUPON OLTV STATUS* LOANS CUT-OFF DATE DATE (MONTHS) (%) (%) FICO (%) ------------------------ ----------- --------------- ---------------- ----------- -------- -------- ------ ------- Owner Occupied 6,728 1,270,393,577.42 90.74 356 39.90 7.415 607 83.29 Non-owner Occupied 804 117,519,713.01 8.39 358 31.60 7.978 648 85.41 Second Home 69 12,085,174.39 0.86 356 39.91 7.344 633 79.37 ----------------------- ----------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------- ---------- -------- ----- --------- TOTAL: 7,601 1,399,998,464.82 100.00 357 39.21 7.462 610 83.43 ----------------------- ----------- ---------------- ---------------- --...
Geographic Distribution. Geographic Distribution # of Loans Aggregate Balance % of Aggregate Balance ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- California 152 $52,495,836 15.00% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- New York 135 46,858,945 13.39 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Florida 140 27,959,625 7.99 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- New Jersey 78 21,763,650 6.22 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Virginia 68 15,370,751 4.39 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maryland 60 14,443,919 4.13 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Massachusetts 39 12,884,273 3.68 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Texas 70 12,000,762 3.43 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pennsylvania 74 10,372,357 2.96 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Illinois 48 9,278,307 2.65 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ohio 71 9,062,613 2.59 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nevada 39 8,992,835 2.57 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Arizona 48 8,434,120 2.41 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michigan 49 8,373,683 2.39 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Washington 44 8,357,973 2.39 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Minnesota 42 7,182,435 2.05 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Colorado 35 6,684,306 1.91 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Georgia 25 4,901,3...
Geographic Distribution. The Action Plan will identify the geographic areas of the City in which the City will direct assistance during the year.
