Further Competition Award Criteria. 1. Where a Contracting Body may require Suppliers to develop proposals or a solution in respect of its Statement of Requirements or need to amend or refine the terms of the Call-Off Contract to reflect its Statement of Requirements to the extent permitted by and in accordance with applicable laws (including procurement laws and all necessary guidance), the following criteria shall be applied to the Services set out in the Framework Service Providers' compliant tenders submitted through the Further Competition Procedure:
Further Competition Award Criteria. 1. The following criteria shall be applied to the Goods and/or Services set out in the Suppliers' compliant tenders submitted through the Further Competition Procedure: Criteria Number Criteria Percentage Weightings (or rank order of importance where applicable) - to be set by the Contracting Body conducting the further competition A Quality 40-90% B Cost effectiveness 0-10% C Technical merit 0-20% D Technical assistance 5-20% E After sales service 0-10% F Price 40-90% G Aesthetic and functional characteristics 5-10% H Running costs 0-10% I Environmental characteristics 0-10% J Delivery date and delivery period 0-10% FRAMEWORK SCHEDULE 7: KEY SUB-CONTRACTORS
Further Competition Award Criteria. The following criteria shall be applied to the Goods and Services set out in the Framework Service Providers’ compliant tenders submitted through the Further Competition Procedure: Criteria Percentage Weightings (or rank order of importance where applicable) - to be set by the Customer conducting the further competition Weighting (Ranges) Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Price 80% - 90% 55% - 70% 35% - 50% 40% - 60% Technical 20% - 10% 45% - 30% 65% - 50% 60% - 40%
Further Competition Award Criteria. The following criteria and weightings shall be applied to Framework Supplier's compliant tenders submitted through the Further Competition. Evaluation criteria Criteria Weighting % Assurance of Supply 15% (+/- 10%) Quality & Management 15% (+/- 10%) Service 15% (+/- 10%) Regulatory Requirements 12.5% (+/- 10%) Innovation 12.5% (+/- 10%) Cost (Price) 30% (+/- 10%)
Further Competition Award Criteria. The Authority or any Panel Customer shall apply the criteria set out below (subject to any alternative or additional criteria specified by the Authority or any Other Panel Customer during the Further Competition Procedure) to the Panel Services set out in the Suppliers compliant tenders submitted through the Further Competition Procedure: Criteria Number Criteria Percentage Weightings (or rank order of importance where applicable) - to be set by the Customer conducting the further competition A Quality B Cost effectiveness C Technical merit D Technical assistance E After sales service F Price G Aesthetic and functional characteristics H Running costs I Environmental characteristics J Delivery date and delivery period K Period of completion PANEL AGREEMENT SCHEDULE 7: KEY SUB-CONTRACTORS In accordance with Clause 25.1 (Appointment of Key Sub-Contractors), the Supplier is entitled to sub-contract its obligations under this Panel Agreement and any Legal Services Contracts entered into pursuant to this Panel Agreement, to the Key Sub-Contractors listed below. Sub Contractor Role the key Sub Contractor will play in the delivery Key Sub Contractor’s % share of the total contract value [REDACTED] [REDACTED] [REDACTED] PANEL AGREEMENT SCHEDULE 8: PANEL MANAGEMENT INTRODUCTION The following definitions shall apply in addition to the definitions contained in the Panel Agreement Schedule 1 (Definitions):
Further Competition Award Criteria. The following criteria and weightings shall be applied to Framework Supplier's compliant tenders submitted through the further competition. Due to the range and complexities of the public sector customer base and requirements, the Authority, subject to the Regulations and the Guidance, reserves the right for Contracting Bodies to define the sub-criteria, including weightings as part of the further competition process. Evaluation criteria Criteria Weighting % Sub-criteria Sub-criteria Weighting % Quality 60% - 80% To be determined by the Contracting Body To be determined by the Contracting Body Price 20% - 40% To be determined by the Contracting Body To be determined by the Contracting Body FRAMEWORK SCHEDULE 4: LETTER OF APPOINTMENT AND call-off terms Letter of Appointment Call-Off Terms FRAMEWORK SCHEDULE 5: value for money
Further Competition Award Criteria. 3.11.1 The Client is advised but not mandated to use the GCS evaluation framework found here: xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx/guidance/campaigns/guide-to- campaign-planning-2/The Client has discretion to develop the Further Competition Award Criteria as it deems appropriate.
Further Competition Award Criteria. The following criteria shall be applied to the Goods and/or Services set out in the Suppliers' compliant tenders submitted through the Further Competition Procedure: Criteria Number Criteria Percentage Weightings (or rank order of importance where applicable) - to be set by the Fund A Price or Day Rate B Number of Days required C Experience demonstrated D Specific experience relating to the project in hand E F G H I J K FRAMEWORK SCHEDULE 7: KEY SUB-CONTRACTORS In accordance with Clause 20.1 (Appointment of Key Sub-Contractors), the Supplier is entitled to sub-contract its obligations under this Framework Agreement and any Call Off Agreements entered into pursuant to this Framework Agreement, to the Key Sub-Contractors listed below. FRAMEWORK SCHEDULE 8: FRAMEWORK MANAGEMENT INTRODUCTION The following definitions shall apply in addition to the definitions contained in the Framework Schedule 1 (Definitions):
Further Competition Award Criteria. 3.1 The following criteria shall be applied to the Services set out in the Suppliers' compliant tenders submitted through the Further Competition Procedure: Criteria Number Criteria Percentage Weightings (or rank order of importance where applicable) - to be set by the Contracting Body conducting the further competition A Quality e.g. Fuel Card Coverage in the UK Transition and Implementation Customer Support Management Information 60% (+ / - 10%)
Further Competition Award Criteria. Where a Contracting Body may require Suppliers to develop proposals or a solution in respect of its Statement of Requirements or need to amend or refine the terms of the Call-Off Contract to reflect its Statement of Requirements to the extent permitted by and in accordance with applicable laws (including procurement laws and all necessary guidance), the following criteria shall be applied to the Services set out in the Framework Service Providers' compliant tenders submitted through the Further Competition Procedure: Determine its requirements in accordance with paragraph 3.1 of Framework Agreement Schedule 5 (Ordering Procedures); Due to the range and complexity of the NHS and Wider Public Sector Contracting Body’ Statement of Requirements, the Authority reserves the right for Contracting Bodies to define the sub-criteria, including weightings, as part of the Further Competition Award process; and The only exception to paragraph 1.2 above is where it is not possible for the Contacting Body to determine the sub-criteria weightings. In this case, the Contracting Body is obliged to provide the Framework Agreement headline award criteria, and weightings in the tender documentation. The weightings to be applied to the sub-criteria may be disclosed at a later stage but before bids are opened provided that the decision to do so:- does not alter the Further Competition Award criteria set out in the contract documents; does not contain elements that, if they had been known at the time the bids were prepared, could have affected that preparation; and is not adopted on the basis of matters likely to give rise to discrimination against bidders. The following criteria shall be applied to the Services set out in the Framework Suppliers compliant tenders submitted through further competition procedure: Evaluation criteria Criteria Weighting % Sub-criteria Sub-criteria Weighting % Price 48 percent to 88 percent To be determined by Contracting Body To be determined by Contracting Body Quality 12 percent to 52 percent To be determined by Contracting Body To be determined by Contracting Body Total 100 percent FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT SCHEDULE 7: value for money
