Final Summative Score – Focused Evaluation Sample Clauses

Final Summative Score – Focused Evaluation. The score received for the selected criterion is the score assigned as the final summative score.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Final Summative Score – Focused Evaluation. The summative score is assigned using the summative score from the most recent comprehensive evaluation. This score becomes the focused summative evaluation score for any of the subsequent years following the comprehensive summative evaluation in which the certificated classroom teacher is placed on a focused evaluation. Should a teacher provide evidence of exemplary practice on the chosen focused criterion, a Level 4 – Distinguished may be awarded by the evaluator.
Sample 1
Final Summative Score – Focused Evaluation. The score received for the selected criterion is the score assigned as the final summative score (Distinguished = 4, Proficient = 3, Basic = 2, Unsatisfactory = 1). A summative score is assigned using the summative score from the most recent comprehensive evaluation. This score becomes the focused summative evaluation score for any of the subsequent years following the comprehensive summative evaluation in which the certificated 2693 2694 2695 2696 2697 2698 2699 2700 2701 2702 2703 2704 2705 2706 2707 2708 2709 2710 2711 2712 2713 2714 2715 2716 2717 2718 2719 2720 2721 2722 2723 2724 2725 2726 2727 2728 2729 2730 2731 2732 2733 2734 2735 2736 2737 2738 2739 2740 classroom teacher is placed on a focused criterion, a level 4 (Distinguished) score may be awarded by the evaluator. WAC 392-191A-120 (2017) If the teacher is focusing on criterion one (1), two (2), five (5), six (6) and eight (8), a preponderance of evidence from the components must be scored in the selected criteria. In addition, the two (2) components from the teacher’s selected student growth goal will be included in the final summative score for the focused evaluation. For criterion eight (8), only the one student growth goal will be scored. Support for Basic and Unsatisfactory Performance Prior to Probation
Sample 1
Final Summative Score – Focused Evaluation. The score received for the selected criterion is the score assigned as the final summative score (Distinguished = 4, Proficient = 3, Basic = 2, Unsatisfactory = 1). If the teacher is focusing on criterion one (1), two (20, five (5), six (6), and eight (8) a minimum of 50% of the components must be scored in the selected criteria. In addition, the two (2) components from the teacher’s selected student growth goal will be included in the final summative score for the focused evaluation. For criterion eight (8), only the one student growth goal will be scored. If the teacher is focusing on criterion three (3), four (4), and seven (7) 100% of the components must be scored in the selected criteria. In addition, the two (2) components from the teacher’s selected student growth goal will be included in the final summative score for the focused evaluation. Components scores within a criterion, and the included student growth scores, will be averaged and rounded to reach a final criterion score. When a final criterion score includes a fractional number (for example 2.33), all scores with fractions below .50 will be rounded down and all fractions .50 or above will be rounded up. For example, a score of 2.33 would receive a final criterion score of 2 and a score of 2.50 would receive a final criterion score of 3.
Sample 1
Final Summative Score – Focused Evaluation. 25 The score received for the selected criterion is the score assigned as the final 26 summative score. 27 28 If the teacher is focusing on criterion one (1), two (2), five (5), or eight (8), a 29 minimum of four (4) components must be scored in the criteria that have been 30 selected for evaluation. The two (2) components for student growth will be included 31 in the final summative score for the focused evaluation. A minimum of six (6) 32 components will be scored in a focus evaluation year for criterion one (1), two (2), 33 five (5), or eight (8). 34 35 If criterion six (6) is selected for the focused evaluation, all three (3) components 36 must be scored plus the two (2) components for student growth will be included in 37 the final summative score for the focused evaluation. A minimum of five (5) 38 components will be scored in the focus evaluation year for criterion six (6). 39 40 If criterion three (3), four (4), or seven (7) is selected for the focused evaluation, all of 41 the components must be scored plus the two (2) components for student growth will 42 be included in the final summative score for the focused evaluation. A minimum of 43 four (4) components will be scored in the focused evaluation year for criterion three 44 (3), four (4), or seven (7) 45 46 The following scoring band will be used to determined the overall summative score 47 for the focused evaluation: 48 49 1 Unsatisfactory Basic Proficient Distinguished 3 6 components 6 – 8 9 – 14 15 – 20 21 – 24 5 5 components 5 – 7 8 – 12 13 – 17 18 – 20 7 4 components 4 – 5 6 – 9 10 – 13 14 – 16 9 A group of teachers may focus on the same evaluation criterion and share 10 professional growth activities. The teacher(s) should initiate this collaboration and 11 no individual shall be required to work on a shared goal. 12
Sample 1
Final Summative Score – Focused Evaluation. The score received for the selected criterion is the score assigned as the final summative score (Distinguished = 4, Proficient = 3, Basic = 2, Unsatisfactory = 1). A summative score is assigned using the summative score from the most recent comprehensive evaluation. This score becomes the focused summative evaluation score for any of the subsequent years following the comprehensive summative evaluation in which the certificated classroom teacher is placed on a focused criterion, a level 4 (Distinguished) score may be awarded by the evaluator. WAC 392-191A-120 (2017) If the teacher is focusing on criterion one (1), two (2), five (5), six (6) and eight (8), a preponderance of evidence from the components must be scored in the selected criteria. In addition, the two (2) components from the teacher’s selected student growth goal will be included in the final summative score for the focused evaluation. For criterion eight (8), only the one student growth goal will be scored.
Sample 1
Final Summative Score – Focused Evaluation. 24 A summative score is assigned using the summative score from the most recent 25 Comprehensive evaluation. This score becomes the Focus summative evaluation 26 score for any of the subsequent years following the Comprehensive summative 27 evaluation in which the certificated classroom teacher is placed on a Focused 28 evaluation. Should a teacher provide evidence of exemplary practice on the chosen 29 focused criterion, a level 4 (Distinguished) score may be awarded by the evaluator, 30 for that school year (will not carry forward). 31 32 If a teacher desires to move from a proficient rating to a “distinguished” overall rating 33 for the year, all components of the selected criteria must be assessed and scored. 34
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Final Summative Score – Focused Evaluation. The score received for the selected criterion is the score assigned as the final summative score (Distinguished = 4, Proficient = 3, Basic = 2, Unsatisfactory = 1). If the teacher is focusing on criterion one (1), two (20, five (5), six (6), and eight
Sample 1

Related to Final Summative Score – Focused Evaluation

  • Offense Level Calculations i. The base offense level is 7, pursuant to Guideline § 2B1.1(a)(1).

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion # 4 READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not i ncrease your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for years two and thr ee and potentially year four, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIP S, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentati on, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from th e “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, wit h any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they ma y apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email Xxxx Xxxxxx at TIPS at xxxx.xxxxxx@t xxx-xxx.xxx

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion 4. READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not increase your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for the life of the contract, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIPS, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from the “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, with any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they may apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email Xxxx Xxxxxx at TIPS at xxxx.xxxxxx@xxxx-xxx.xxx 8 Choice of Law clauses with TIPS Members If the vendor is awarded a contract with TIPS under this solicitation, the vendor agrees to make any Choice of Law clauses in any contract or agreement entered into between the awarded vendor and with a TIPS member entity to read as follows: "Choice of law shall be the laws of the state where the customer resides" or words to that effect. 9

  • BID EVALUATION The Commissioner reserves the right to accept or reject any and all Bids, or separable portions of Bids, and waive technicalities, irregularities, and omissions if the Commissioner determines the best interests of the State will be served. The Commissioner, in his/her sole discretion, may accept or reject illegible, incomplete or vague Bids and his/her decision shall be final. A conditional or revocable Bid which clearly communicates the terms or limitations of acceptance may be considered, and Contract award may be made in compliance with the Bidder’s conditional or revocable terms in the Bid.

  • Bilingual Differential When formally assigned in the employee’s position description, an employee assigned to interpret to or from another language to English will receive a differential of five percent (5%) of base pay.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion # 4. READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not i ncrease your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for years two and thr ee and potentially year four, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIP S, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentati on, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from th e “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, wit h any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they ma y apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email Xxxx Xxxxxx at TIPS at xxxx.xxxxxx@t xxx-xxx.xxx Choice of Law clauses with TIPS Members If the vendor is awarded a contract with TIPS under this solicitation, the vendor agrees to make any Choice of Law c lauses in any contract or agreement entered into between the awarded vendor and with a TIPS member entity to re ad as follows: "Choice of law shall be the laws of the state where the customer resides" or words to that effect. 5 Agreed Venue of dispute resolution with a TIPS Member In the event of litigation or use of any dispute resolution model when resolving disputes with a TIPS member entity a s a result of a transaction between the vendor and TIPS or the TIPS member entity, the Venue for any litigation or ot her agreed upon model shall be in the state and county where the customer resides unless otherwise agreed by the parties at the time the dispute resolution model is decided by the parties. Agreed

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.