EVALUATION OF PROGRESS Clause Samples
The 'Evaluation of Progress' clause establishes a process for regularly assessing the advancement of work or fulfillment of obligations under an agreement. Typically, this involves setting specific milestones, timelines, or performance indicators that are reviewed at predetermined intervals to ensure that the project or contractual duties are on track. By providing a structured mechanism for monitoring progress, this clause helps identify potential delays or issues early, enabling timely corrective actions and ensuring that both parties remain aligned with the contract's objectives.
EVALUATION OF PROGRESS. This section applies only if CONTRACTOR is an NPS. Each year the LEA shall evaluate whether pupils for whom an ISA with CONTRACTOR is in effect are making appropriate educational progress. To the extent reasonably possible the evaluation shall be conducted as part of the development and provision of an IEP and shall include:
a) A review of the pupil’s educational progress (including all state assessment results pursuant to Ed. Code § 52052(b));
b) An evaluation of whether the pupil’s needs continue to be best met in an NPS and whether changes to the IEP are necessary; and
c) If CONTRACTOR is owned, operated by, or associated with an LCI, a review of whether the NPS is in compliance with Education Code § 56366.9 (i.e., prohibition against requiring enrollment in a particular NPS as a condition of residential placement) and Health and Safety Code § 1501.1
EVALUATION OF PROGRESS. 4.1 The teacher evaluates his/her own effectiveness in terms of student performance.
4.2 The teacher assesses student performance.
4.3 The teacher communicates progress to students and parents.
EVALUATION OF PROGRESS. At the conclusion of the Fellows Program, the DASD(SCI) will review and evaluate the Fellow’s progress and forward a memorandum to the Fellow's parent organization, which remains responsible for formal feedback/performance assessment. CONCUR: TRAINEE NAME SIGNATURE/ DATE APPROVED: SUPERVISOR NAME SIGNATURE/ DATE ENDORSED: Service or Agency 4 SIGNATURE/ DATE Expectations:
1. Participate in all scheduled events (training and academic, orientation visits, executive level engagements, industry trips, and assignments)
2. Continuous feedback and engagement with home station
3. Readiness to take on new challenges, expand knowledge base and grow through leadership training feedback
EVALUATION OF PROGRESS. Students will be evaluated annually during the study period. Students will be required to produce a report at the end of the first (probationary) year which will be used in the preliminary evaluation, sometimes referred to as a candidacy exam, detailed below. Subsequently they will be evaluated by the supervisory committee at the end of their second year and if necessary, third year, and take a final examination, in the form of a viva voce, after submission of the thesis. Students will also be required to give a public presentation of their thesis. Both evaluations will be carried out jointly between BU and CATIE on their campus, whichever is most appropriate. They may be conducted with the aid of electronic communications systems available at BU and CATIE. Students will also be invited to submit comments in confidence to the ▇▇▇▇ at ▇▇▇▇▇ or the Academic Registrar at BU on aspects of their program including, inter alia: Efficiency of the admissions procedures Adequacy of resources Quality and effectiveness of supervision Quality and value of information produced for the joint program. During the first (probationary) year, each student is required to demonstrate a minimum level of competence in carrying out independent research. Assessment is made on the basis of the report written by the student (which must be presented and defended orally), which should include a research plan plus any results of research completed in the first year. Each student must also fulfill any other assessments as specified by the supervisory committee. Students who are unable to satisfy the supervisory committee in the first year assessment may either not be allowed to proceed to complete the PhD program or be transferred onto an MPhil program. The preliminary evaluation will be made by the supervisory committee, which will be report to the Doctoral Committee at CATIE and the Director of Postgraduate Studies, School of Environment, Natural Resources and Geography at BU. Students are also required to give a public presentation of their research project to the scientific and/or academic community. This presentation should take place during the first year of the doctoral program.
EVALUATION OF PROGRESS. At the conclusion of the Fellows Program, the DASD(SCI), DASD(MPP) and DASD (TP) will review and evaluate the Fellow’s progress and forward a memorandum to the Fellow's parent organization, which remains responsible for formal performance appraisals.