Enforcement Policy. In an effort to ensure any claims or disputes by exhibitors at the Event (or in the time period prior to the Event) are handled in a non-disruptive manner, the Association hereby agrees to provide all exhibitors at the Event with the services of an intellectual property mediator (“IP Mediator”). At the Event and in the time period leading up to the Event, IP Mediator will provide assistance to exhibitors by evaluating potential intellectual property infringement claims and will work closely with the Association to issue any Sanctions (as defined below), if necessary. The Exhibitor understands and agrees that the IP Mediator is a neutral party enlisted to mediate and settle disputes between exhibitors related to intellectual property or proprietary rights, as well as any violation of the Rules. Exhibitor understands and agrees that all decisions made by the IP Mediator are final, and shall not be subject to appeal or challenge. The Exhibitor understands and agrees that, at the Event and in the time period leading up to the Event, any exhibitor (“Complaining Exhibitor”) may lodge with IP Mediator a complaint against any other exhibitor (“Defending Exhibitor”), which after investigation may result in the Sanctions by the IP Mediator or the Association at the Event. IP Mediator’s evaluation of such a complaint will be free of charge to the Complaining Exhibitor. Exhibitor understands and agrees that the enforcement action or sanctions (“Sanctions”) shall be issued by IP Mediator and/ or the Association in their sole discretion and may include but shall not be limited to: (i) the removal of any item, product, catalog, photograph or image (whether in digital or print) material, URL, product or device (“Exhibitor Content”), (ii) the shutdown of an exhibitor's booth at the Event, (iii) restrictions on access or services provided by the Association, (iv) a loss of membership to the Association; or (v) a ban from any future show or event. The Exhibitor understands and agrees that any determination by IP Mediator and/or the Association to issue any Sanctions is not a legal determination that any intellectual property infringement or violation has occurred; instead, Sanctions shall be issued (i) to enforce the rules and guidelines at the Event, including the Rules; (ii) when IP Mediator believes that the display of any Exhibitor Content is potentially infringing on another exhibitor’s intellectual property or proprietary rights, or when IP Mediator and/or Association ...
Enforcement Policy. To consider and agree key policy documents To be aware of the joint service policy in respect to prosecutions and other disposals. To maintain financial oversight of the Service to ensure sound financial management. To propose fee structure, annual budget to the Councils and agree any variations from the budget from the Inter Authority Agreement. To quarterly review the budget monitoring information Monitor the budget, approve spend in accordance with Standing Orders for financial processes. Provide budget monitoring reports to the JMB and JC. To monitor delivery of the Business To provide support and guidance To provide annual reports to the Case including delivery of savings and additional income. to the Joint Management Team to assist achievement of delivering the Business Case. JMB/JC on delivery of the business case. To decide how to spend any additional surplus income, additional savings or under spend – whether these should be reinvested in the Service or returned to each local authority in the usual proportions. To suggest alternatives for the Joint Management Team to develop and to provide constructive challenge to ideas to enable the Joint Committee to make well informed decisions. To provide comprehensive information on possible ways to spend any additional surplus income/savings or under spend including a consideration of the impact of any such spend. To receive reports on the performance of the Inter Authority Agreement. To identify defaults against the Inter Authority Agreement and resolve these to the satisfaction of both Councils. To monitor operational delivery against strategic priorities SCHEDULE 2 - RELEVANT FUNCTIONS 1 Excluded Functions
Enforcement Policy. On November 17, 2010, the State Water Board adopted Resolution No. 2009-0083 amending the Water Quality Enforcement Policy (Enforcement Policy). The Enforcement Policy was approved by the Office of Administrative Law and became effective on May 20, 2010. The Enforcement Policy establishes a methodology for assessing administrative civil liability. In light of substantial negotiations having occurred prior to May 20, 2010, the Parties agree to the use of the Enforcement Policy adopted in 2002 for this Stipulation and Order.
Enforcement Policy. Bridgend County Borough Council has signed up to the Enforcement Concordat. The principles contained in the Concordat and the code of practice for the Crown Prosecution Service were combined to produce the Public Protection Section’s Overarching Enforcement Policy. The policy was subject to consultation with the public, business and Members before being formally adopted by the Council. Under the umbrella of the Overarching Enforcement Policy there is a specific Food Safety Enforcement Policy which was formally adopted by Council in 2004.
Enforcement Policy. Statutory penalties, forfeitures, or debts established as an aid to enforce- ment and to compel compliance may be compromised if not prohibited by law and consistent with the agency’s en- forcement policy.
Enforcement Policy. The Official Agency and the Authority agree to exchange enforcement policies and to consult with the other party where there are proposals to amend or change either of their enforcement policies.
Enforcement Policy. A copy of the Councils approved enforcement policy is shown at Appendix B. This document is available upon request and is also published in full on the Council’s web site. The policy is designed to reflect the principles referred to in The Food Safety Act Code of Practice as well as the Enforcement Concordat that the Council is a signatory to.
Enforcement Policy. Cheltenham Borough Council has adopted and published a corporate enforcement policy, based on the Enforcement Concordat, which will form the basis of all enforcement action undertaken by the Food Service.
Enforcement Policy. Forest Heath District Council and St. Edmundsbury Borough Council currently have separate written Enforcement Policies. Work is underway to produce a Joint West Suffolk Council’s Enforcement Policy, providing a framework for all of the regulatory services delivered by the Councils, including the food safety service. The policy will reflect recent changes brought about by the Regulators Code which establishes how non-economic regulators should interact with those they are regulating. The new Code requires regulators to: • Carry out their activities in a transparent way that helps those they regulate to comply and grow; • Design simple and straightforward ways to engage with and hear the views of those they regulate; • Base their regulatory activities on risk and share information about compliance and risk; and • Ensure clear information, guidance and advice is available to help those they regulate meet their responsibilities. Officers, including those with responsibility for the enforcement of food and health and safety laws, must have regard to the Enforcement Policy when making enforcement decisions.
