– Does not apply. Employees who work five (5) consecutive hours without a meal break and are required to work without a meal break shall receive an additional one-half (1/2) of their straight time hourly rate for all time worked beyond the fifth (5th) consecutive hour until their mealbreak.
– Does not apply. The University will provide food for staff when client requirements and operational needs dictate that the timing and scheduling of meal breaks will be uncertain.
– Does not apply. Employees who are affected by work schedule changes with less than 24 hours’ notice where the work day starts more than one hour earlier than the original start time shall be paid at double time for those additional hours. Employees who are affected by work schedule changes with less than 24 hours’ notice where the work day starts more than one hour later than the original start time shall be paid at their regular hourly rate from the time they were originally scheduled to commence work. Any unworked hours will not be included for the purpose of calculating overtime. Employees whose shift is cancelled with less than 24 hours’ notice shall be paid at their regular hourly rate for the hours they were originally scheduled to work.
– Does not apply. The one-year marriage rule does not apply. [Note: If Election 42(a) is elected, annuities are a form of distribution under the Plan even if Election 39(b)(4) is not elected.]
– Does not apply. Overtime is defined as time worked in excess of 7.5 hours per day or 37.5 hours per week (Monday to Sunday inclusive). At a minimum, hours worked in excess of 7.5 hours per day or 37.5 hours per week will be compensated at one and a half (1½) times the employee’s straight time hourly rate. Additional premiums will apply as follows:
– Does not apply. Not covered Up to RMB 315 per visit up to a maximum of 15 visits per period of cover Up to RMB 630 per visit up to a maximum of 15 visits per period of cover Up to RMB 945 per visit up to a maximum of 15 visits per period of cover
– Does not apply. Docking clause
– Does not apply. If the party trying to rely on mistake was negligent (XxXxx) EX: entertaining a belief without any reasonable ground EX: deliberately inducing the belief in the mind of the other party In the alternative, Xxxxx could argue the equitable doctrine of mistake (VOIDABLE) The doctrine was developed by Xxxx Xxxxxxx in the Court of Appeal of England in the case of Xxxxx v Xxxxxxx. However, the use of the doctrine is not without controversy. In the 2002 case of Great Peace Shipping, The England Court of Appeal reversed itself and killed the equitable mistake doctrine as they determined it was a confusing area of the law. More recently, in 2007 the Ontario Court of Appeal in Xxxxxx Paving held equitable mistake as still existing in Canadian law There are strong policy reasons to why equitable mistake should still be a doctrine utilized in Canadian law.. POLICY Parties under a common misapprehension either as to the facts or as to their relative and respective rights, provided that: Misrepresentation was fundamental, and: That the party seeking to set it aside was not himself at fault (Xxxxx v Xxxxxxx) EX: Not being diligent about your business (Xxxxxx Paving) Unreasonably incompetent Bring advice of external advice to show not at fault!! Likely not incompetent EX: Xxxxxxx, not incompetent Relied on Solles advice – Xxxxx at fault, not Butcher (Xxxxx v Xxxxxxx) FRUSTRATION
– Does not apply. 9. Defendant’s pension, profit sharing, retirement plan, or IRA shall be awarded as follows: .
– Does not apply. The parties shall be awarded all right, title, interest and equity in and to the following assets, financial or other asset, as follows: Asset Location Account or Value Awarded To Policy (last 4 digits)
