Common use of District Court Clause in Contracts

District Court. If the claimant is dissatisfied with Tryg Forsikring’s decision, he/she may bring action against Tryg Forsikring. The action may be brought in the district court in the claimant’s domi- cile in Finland, in the domicile of Tryg Forsikring or in the place of loss in Finland, unless otherwise prescribed by Fin- land’s international agreements. Action against Tryg For- sikring’s indemnity decision must be brought within three years of the claimant being informed in writing about Tryg Forsikring’s decision and the time limit. After the time limit has expired, the right to bring action ceases.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: danskebank.fi, danskebank.fi

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

District Court. If the claimant is dissatisfied with Tryg Forsikring’s decisiondeci- sion, he/she may bring action against Tryg Forsikring. The action may be brought in the district court in the claimant’s domi- cile domicile in Finland, in the domicile of Tryg Forsikring For- sikring or in the place of loss in Finland, unless otherwise other- wise prescribed by Fin- landFinland’s international agreements. Action against Tryg For- sikringForsikring’s indemnity decision must be brought within three years of the claimant being informed in- formed in writing about Tryg Forsikring’s decision and the time limit. After the time limit has expired, the right to bring action ceases.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: danskebank.fi

District Court. If the claimant is dissatisfied with Tryg Forsikring’s decisiondeci- sion, he/she may bring action against Tryg Forsikring. The action may be brought in the district court in the claimant’s domi- cile domicile in Finland, in the domicile of Tryg Forsikring or in the place of loss in Finland, unless otherwise other- wise prescribed by Fin- landFinland’s international agreements. Action against Tryg For- sikringForsikring’s indemnity decision must be brought within three years of the claimant being informed in writing about Tryg Forsikring’s decision and the time limit. After the time limit has expired, the right to bring action ceases.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: danskebank.fi

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

District Court. If the claimant is dissatisfied with Tryg Forsikring’s decisiondeci- sion, he/she may bring action against Tryg Forsikring. The action may be brought in the district court in the claimant’s domi- cile domicile in Finland, in the domicile of Tryg Forsikring For- sikring or in the place of loss in Finland, unless otherwise other- wise prescribed by Fin- landFinland’s international agreements. Action against Tryg For- sikringForsikring’s indemnity decision must be brought within three years of the claimant being informed in writing about Tryg Forsikring’s decision and the time limit. After the time limit has expired, the right to bring action ceases.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: danskebank.fi

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.