Dispute Process - Choices Sample Clauses

Dispute Process - Choices. Where there is no agreement as to whether the job is to be non-bargaining unit or bargaining unit by the end of the meeting with the Director of Labour Relations (or designate) and the Union designate, the disagreement can be referred directly to the Grievance Settlement Board as a policy grievance in accordance with Article 12.09.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Dispute Process - Choices. Where there is no agreement as to whether the job is to be NBU or BU by the end of the meeting with the Director of Labour Relations (or designate) and the Union designate, the disagreement will be processed as outlined below:
Sample 1Sample 2
Dispute Process - Choices. Where there is no agreement as to whether the job is to be or by the end of the meeting with the Manager of Labour Relations (or designate) and the Union designate, the disagreement will be processed as outlined below: Where agreed to by both parties, refer the issue to a mutually agreed third party (arbitrator) for a final and binding decision, or Refer the issue to the Grievance Settlement Board or Labour Relations Board for a final and binding decision. The parties recognize that the fifteen (15) working day timeframe specified in Article “12.07 Arbitration” will apply for referring a dispute to either the Labour Relations Board, or third party arbitration. The fifteen (15) working days will commence on the day after the information is received.
Sample 1
Dispute Process - Choices. Where there is no agreement as to whether the job is to be NBU or BU by the end of the meeting with the Director of Labour Relations (or designate) and the Union designate, the disagreement can be referred directly to the Grievance Settlement Board as a policy grievance in accordance with article 12.09. The costs of administering the arbitration process will be equally shared between the Employer and the Union.
Sample 1

Related to Dispute Process - Choices

  • Formal Dispute Process Members representing: (i) any one of the three state Participant Groups or (ii) an aggregate of at least six (6) votes, may appeal the informal Dispute by signing and furnishing to the Regional Director, the Program Manager, and each other Member, a written request to initiate a formal Dispute. This request must, with reasonable specificity, identify the issue(s) in Dispute, the relief sought, and any supporting documentation. If such a request is not received by the Regional Director within ten

  • Dispute Procedure (1) Unless otherwise provided in the Council's Constitution or in this Collective Agreement, any dispute within the registered scope of the Council shall be resolved as set out below:

  • Dispute Procedures Prior to instituting any litigation or other dispute resolution, the parties shall follow applicable procedures set forth in this Agreement for the resolution of such dispute. Any appeals taken with respect to any dispute that arises in connection with this Agreement shall be taken in the federal district court in Portland, Maine or, if said court does not have jurisdiction, in such courts in the State of Maine that do have jurisdiction.

  • Customer Service, Dispute Resolution If you have a question about your XOOM charges or service you may contact XOOM directly by calling 0-000-000-0000 Monday – Friday 8 (eight) a.m. to 11 (eleven)p.m.

  • Informal Dispute Resolution Process 1. In the event there is a dispute under this Centralized Contract, the Contractor, OGS and Authorized User agree to exercise their best efforts to resolve the dispute as soon as possible. The Contractor, OGS and Authorized User shall, without delay, continue to perform their respective obligations under this Centralized Contract which are not affected by the dispute. Primary responsibility for resolving any dispute arising under this Centralized Contract shall rest with the Authorized User’s Contractor Coordinators and the Contractor’s Account Executive and the State & Local Government Regional General Manager.

  • Dispute Resolution Process Any claim, dispute or other matter in question not resolved by the process identified in Paragraph

  • CENTRAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS The following process pertains exclusively to disputes and grievances on central matters that have been referred to the central process. In accordance with the School Board Collective Bargaining Act, 2014 central matters may also be grieved locally, in which case local grievance processes will apply. In the event that central language is being grieved locally, the local parties shall provide the grievance to their respective central agents.

  • Negotiation; Alternative Dispute Resolution The Parties will attempt in good faith to resolve any dispute or controversy arising out of or relating to the performance of services under this Agreement. If the Parties are unable to resolve the dispute, then, pursuant to San Francisco Administrative Code Section 21.36, Contractor may submit to the Contracting Officer a written request for administrative review and documentation of the Contractor's claim(s). Upon such request, the Contracting Officer shall promptly issue an administrative decision in writing, stating the reasons for the action taken and informing the Contractor of its right to judicial review. If agreed by both Parties in writing, disputes may be resolved by a mutually agreed-upon alternative dispute resolution process. If the parties do not mutually agree to an alternative dispute resolution process or such efforts do not resolve the dispute, then either Party may pursue any remedy available under California law. The status of any dispute or controversy notwithstanding, Contractor shall proceed diligently with the performance of its obligations under this Agreement in accordance with the Agreement and the written directions of the City. Neither Party will be entitled to legal fees or costs for matters resolved under this section.

  • Mediation Process A. Mediation is a form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) that may be requested by the City or the PBA. It is an alternative, not a substitute for the formal arbitration process contained in Section 19.7 above. Mediation is an informal process in which a neutral third party assists the opposing parties in reaching a voluntary, negotiated resolution of a charge of discipline. The decision to mediate is completely voluntary for the PBA and the City. Mediation gives the parties the opportunity to discuss the issues raised in the charging document, clear up misunderstandings, determine the underlying interests or concerns, find areas of agreement and, ultimately, incorporate those areas of agreement into solutions. A mediator does not resolve the charge or impose a decision on the parties. Instead, the mediator helps the parties to agree on a mutually acceptable resolution. The mediation process is strictly confidential. Information disclosed during mediation will not be revealed to anyone.

  • Dispute Settling Procedures (1) The principles of conciliation and direct negotiation shall be adopted for the purpose of prevention and settlement of any questions, disputes or difficulties that may arise in the operation of this Agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.