Discussion of the results Sample Clauses

Discussion of the results. First, the reader should notice that the free energy of Sparse MBP (24) and of Xxxxxx QAP (25) exhibit a phase transition similar to that of Xxxxxxx’x Random Energy Model (REM) (Xxxxxxx, 1981, Section V). We like to emphasize that Sparse MBP and Xxxxxx QAP introduce some correlation between costs of pairs of solutions, while REM defines a technically much simpler setting without any correlations between cost values. Second, regarding the behavior of expected log-posterior agreement (4) shown in Theorem 4, we can notice that it shows two phase transitions with quadratic, mixed and linear phases, which corresponds to three phases of the Generalized REM, well explained in (Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxxx, 1986, Section 3). Its behavior is visualized in Fig. 5. We make the following brief observations, explaining the combinatorial meaning for an approximate learning process: ^ — The normalized eLPA in (33) depends on the temperature by the product βσ, which pronounces the fact that the reference scale for the temperature of Xxxxx posteriors is adjusted by the amount of signal in data. — The noise-to-signal ratio γ p√lays the crucial role. For a fixed signal σ, the optimal temperature β^∗ grows to 2/σ, as the noise-to-signal vanishes (γ → 0, i.e. σ˜ σ). This behavior supports our intuition that a posterior adapted to ^ the signal variance is better to choose in the absence of noise. Optimal β∗ is located in the so called retrieval phase. Figure 5: Behavior of the expected log-posterior agreement (4). — The high temperature phase β^ → 0 results in low eLPA meaning that ^ → ∞ informative solutions cannot be found by sampling from Xxxxx posteriors (which are too “broad”) in this phase.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Discussion of the results. Table 3.1 summarizes the outcomes of all the experimental techniques adopted to characterize traps in our devices. When DLTS is applied to diodes (that do not have the GaN cap layer), only traps B and C are detected, while trap A is not. This suggests that trap A is located in the cap layer or at the device surface, while traps B and C are located in the device bulk. On the other hand, the remaining three techniques, that is current mode DLTS on FAT- HEMTs, low-frequency transconductance dispersion measurements and temperature- dependent gate-lag measurements (the latter two methods being applied to short-gate HEMTs), provide the same indications for the three traps. Now, for trap A all techniques consistently indicate that it must be located in the cap or at the device surface. For traps B and C, on the contrary, we got inconsistent indications, with the comparison between DLTS on FAT-HEMTs and diodes pointing at bulk localization, while current mode DLTS, transconductance and gate lag methods suggesting surface localization. TECHNIQUE Trap A Trap B Trap C DLTS on diodes NOT detected Detected Detected DLTS (FAT-HEMTs) Detected Detected Detected I-DLTS (FAT-HEMTs) “Hole-like” peak “Hole-like” peak “Hole-like” peak gm(f) N.A. Negative dispersion N.A. Gate lag measurements Increasing ID transient Increasing ID transient Increasing ID transient Location Surface, cap Inconsistent indications Inconsistent indications Table 3.1: the results from all trap characterization techniques In order to investigate these contrasting evidences, the drain-current (ID) transients were measured at room temperature, where trap B dominates (see Figure 3.2), by using different VGS test pulses. As a matter of fact, as long as VGS is pulsed from 0 V to a negative value (VGS,off) higher than the pinch-off voltage, the ID transient is of the type that is generally attributed to surface traps (see Figure 3.7). However, when VGS,off approaches the pinch-off voltage (that is about 4.8 V in the devices under test), the shape of the ID transient changes to that characteristic of a bulk trap (Figure 3.8). In this regard, some questions arise: can the same trap be at the origin of the two opposite ID transient behaviors? and why? and where must this trap be located? To try to answer to these questions, two-dimensional numerical simulations were carried out by using a commercial code. VGS 0V -3V VDS = 1.5V 0.35 0.34 a.u. 0.33 0.32 0.31 0.3 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 Time (s) Figure 3.7: Exp...
Discussion of the results. Critical design change decisions made by MTI after the baseline studies and first version of the DIP, and again after the MTE, significantly contributed to the successful increases in the behavior change and health system improvements achieved by the project. Addition of a malaria intervention was an essential response to address the epidemiologic patterns revealed in the baseline assessments as well as feedback from the DIP reviewers. A staffing change was made when MTI assumed responsibility for hiring and mentoring the Community Outreach Coordinator that was originally under XXXX’s supervision. IR 1: Communities assume responsibility for their own health with strengthened community structures, linkages with Health Facility staff, and enhanced human resource capacity Intermediate Result 1: Communities assume responsibility for their own health with strengthened community structures, linkages with Health Facility staff, and enhanced human resource capacity Indicator Baseline Value Final Value Final Target % of HHPs referring patients to clinic 0% 100% 75% % of HHPs who received a supervisory visit during the last three months 0% 100% 75% % of communities using information from community HIS for decision making 0% 63% 40% % of CHCs with one or more women participating on the committee. 0% 75% 65% % of health facilities with active CHDCs who have met in the last three months 0% 77% 80% % of communities with an economic plan for emergency health needs 0% 89% with 52% reporting it is working well 60% % of communities with an emergency transport plan 0% 87% 65% Six of the seven project indicators for strengthening community capacity were met. The community referral system was working well and CHCs had been revitalized and implementing emergency transport systems and economic plans. The indicator “% of health facilities with active CHDCs who have met in the last three months” was not met as CHDCs were established or revitalized at only 23 of 30 health facilities. MTI offered assistance to the CHT to establish CHCDs at the remaining seven facilities, though the CHT has not taken the initiative to do so. The DIP process that led to adopting the Care Group approach after the beginning of the program is a lesson in sustainable capacity building. XXX contracted as a consultant and trainer an experienced Liberian nurse midwife who was familiar with community-based MCH programs and Care Groups and who also had years of experience working with both the MoHSW and NGO pr...

Related to Discussion of the results

  • Discussion Staff has reviewed the proposal relative to all relevant policies and advise that it is reasonably consistent with the intent of the MPS. Attachment B provides an evaluation of the proposed development agreement in relation to the relevant MPS policies.

  • Discussions Within 14 days of the date of the notice under Clause 23.2 (Advance Notice) of this article, the Union and the Employer will commence discussions for the purpose of reaching agreement as to the effects of the technological change and in what way, if any, this agreement should be amended.

  • - OWNERSHIP/USE OF THE RESULTS II.3.1 Unless stipulated otherwise in this agreement, ownership of the results of the action, including industrial and intellectual property rights, and of the reports and other documents relating to it shall be vested in the beneficiary.

  • Discussion of Differences If a difference arises between the Employer and an employee(s) or between the Employer and the Union concerning the interpretation, application, operation or any alleged violation of the Agreement, the employee(s) shall continue to work in accordance with the Agreement until the difference is settled.

  • Informal Discussions The employee's concerns will be presented orally by the employee to the appropriate supervisor. Every effort shall be made by all concerned in an informal manner to develop an understanding of the facts and the issues in order to create a climate which will lead to resolution of the problem. If the employee is not satisfied with the informal discussion(s) relative to the matter in question, he/she may proceed to the formal grievance procedure.

  • Informal Discussion If an employee has a problem relating to a work situation, the employee is encouraged to request a meeting with his or her immediate supervisor to discuss the problem in an effort to clarify the issue and to work cooperatively towards settlement.

  • Implementation of the Report 1. The Panel report shall be final and binding on the disputing Parties. 2. If the report issued by the Panel determines that a Party has not conformed with its obligations under this Agreement, the Party complained against shall eliminate the non- conformity. 3. The Party complained against shall comply with the recommendation of the Panel promptly or, if not practicable, within a reasonable period of time. The Parties shall agree on reasonable period of time within 30 days of the notification of the report of the Panel. In any case, such reasonable period of time shall not exceed 300 calendar days after the release of the report.

  • Settlement Discussions This Agreement is part of a proposed settlement of matters that could otherwise be the subject of litigation among the Parties hereto. Nothing herein shall be deemed an admission of any kind. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 408 and any applicable state rules of evidence, this Agreement and all negotiations relating thereto shall not be admissible into evidence in any proceeding other than to prove the existence of this Agreement or in a proceeding to enforce the terms of this Agreement.

  • Publication of Results The National Aeronautics and Space Act (51 U.S.C. § 20112) requires NASA to provide for the widest practicable and appropriate dissemination of information concerning its activities and the results thereof. As such, NASA may publish unclassified and non-Proprietary Data resulting from work performed under this Agreement. The Parties will coordinate publication of results allowing a reasonable time to review and comment.

  • Audit Results If an audit by a Party determines that an overpayment or an underpayment has occurred, a notice of such overpayment or underpayment shall be given to the other Party together with those records from the audit which support such determination.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.