Direct evidence Sample Clauses

Direct evidence. Two third-party studies have compared student learning in classrooms of teachers joining MCL teams to learning in classrooms of other teachers. On average, teachers who joined Opportunity Culture Multi-Classroom Leader teams moved from producing student learning growth at the 50th percentile of teachers to the 77th percentile in both reading and math. One study is XXXXXX’x 2018 research on early Opportunity Culture districts, including Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools.6 The other is a 2021 study of implementation in a Texas school district.7 Both studies used similar, rigorous quasi-experimental designs to isolate the impact of MCL team-membership on student learning. With team teachers achieving outcomes in the top quartile of teachers, the model provides equitable access to highly effective teaching to a much larger group of students than typical classroom arrangements. In addition, Public Impact itself has gathered annual anonymous survey data from educators engaged in Opportunity Culture teams, which finds high levels of satisfaction with the model. In the most recent year (spring 2023), for example, 97% of Multi-Classroom Leaders indicated a desire for these models to continue at their schools, along with 86% of educators in all Opportunity Culture roles.8 Since 93% of Opportunity Culture schools are Title I eligible, these studies provide considerable evidence that these models will make a positive difference for teachers and students in schools impacted by this grant. Evidence on components. In addition to these direct analyses of Opportunity Culture, many studies suggest critical components of the model – namely (a) teacher-leadership and (b) the enhanced professional development and teacher support that it makes possible – contribute to teacher satisfaction and retention and higher student learning.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Direct evidence

  • Title Evidence Seller agrees to share equally with Buyer the closing agent costs and the cost of a title insurance company’s commitment and standard ALTA form owner’s policy (except survey matters) to the Property, showing a marketable title vested in Seller, subject to easements, restrictions, covenants, and other matters of record. Any endorsements shall be paid solely by Buyer. The title evidence shall be presented to prospective Buyer on day of auction. Buyer acknowledges: (a) receipt of the title commitment prior to entering into this agreement; (b) review of the title commitment to the Buyer’s full satisfaction; and (c) waiver of any right to object to any exceptions listed therein. If Seller fails to satisfy all such title requirements imposed on Seller pursuant to title commitment, Buyer may, as its sole remedy and at Buyer’s election, either: (a) cancel this agreement and receive a return of Buyer’s xxxxxxx money and, in that event, this Agreement will be canceled and the parties will have no further obligations to each other; or (b) accept such title as Seller can deliver. Buyer waives any right to seek specific performance or to seek damages from Seller.

  • Categories of Evidence Multiple measures of student learning, growth, and achievement, judgments based on observations and artifacts of professional practice, including unannounced observations of practice of any duration; and additional evidence relevant to one or more Standards of Effective Teaching Practice (603 CMR 35.03).

  • Other Evidence The Purchaser shall have received from the -------------- Company and the Stockholder such further certificates and documents evidencing due action in accordance with this Agreement, including certified copies of proceedings of the Board of Directors and stockholders of the Company, as the Purchaser reasonably shall request.

  • Student Evaluation A. All unit members shall be subject to student evaluations each semester in each course taught.

  • Evidence Used In Evaluation The following categories of evidence shall be used in evaluating each Educator:

  • Student Evaluations Student evaluations shall be completed by the end of the 12th week of the Fall semester.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Instructions for Certification – First Tier Participants a. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective first tier participant is providing the certification set out below.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation (c) The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.