Direct Benefits. The first benefit to be taken into account is direct revenue from admissions, television rights, corporate sponsorships, concession fees, licencing logos and use of names, etc. This revenue will help defray costs and will reduce the need for subsidies from government. A comparison of direct revenue and costs will show clearly the shortfall that must be offset with subsidies and other benefits. Direct revenue from admissions is estimated from visitor pro- jections (see Overview of Economic Impact Assessment, Step Three). Other direct revenues will be estimated based on expectations from negotiations between the bid group and the various sources of revenue (e.g., television networks, corporate sponsors, private entrepreneurs).
Direct Benefits. Savings attributable to unqualified applicants; Denial of benefits to unqualified applicants; Cessation of benefits to unqualified recipients Recouping payment made to unqualified recipients Computer matches are an effective way for States to verify the income circumstances of applicants, and ensure that payments and services are not provided to ineligible applicants. Results of the DMDC and State agencies data files statistical match indicate that with information from this match, States will be able to recoup a substantial amount of funds paid to recipients who were not qualified for benefits, and stop payments and services to unqualified recipients. This CBA focuses on the latter, which is the most immediate benefit to the States.
Direct Benefits. These benefits from a successful SOLVIT complaint will include both the immediate benefits to the applicant and also wider longer term benefits from changing procedures or rules that prevent similar problems in the future. In estimating benefits, we first estimated the benefits arising from individual cases using data from the SOLVIT database, and then consider the long term position using survey data.
Direct Benefits. Savings attributable to detecting unqualified clients. • Denial of benefits to unqualified applicants, avoiding improper payments • Cessation of benefits to unqualified recipients, avoiding improper payments • Recovery of improper payments made to unqualified recipients Computer matches are an effective way for states to verify the income circumstances of applicants and ensure payments and services are not provided to ineligible applicants. Results of previous DMDC, VA and SPAA data file statistical matches indicate that information from PARIS matching programs enables states to recoup a substantial amount of funds paid to recipients not qualified for benefits and stop payments and services to unqualified recipients. This analysis focuses on the latter, avoiding improper payments, which is the most significant and immediate benefit to the states.
Direct Benefits. These are fees paid into a contractually designated special account for resource and capital improvements that directly benefit the public in the area of operations where the fees are collected.
Direct Benefits. Once completed, please return the completed Agreement, including all addendums and other necessary forms and applications, to Company at the following address: 00 X. 00xx Xx. #000, Xx. Xxxx, MN 55101 Phone 000-000-0000 Fax 000-000-0000 xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx Lead Provider will receive written confirmation of Company receipt.
