Difference of Opinion Sample Clauses

Difference of Opinion. Differences of opinion between the PRNC and the Chief Nursing Officer, shall not be subject to grievance and arbitration. Issues involving contract interpretation and/or alleged contract violations shall be subject to all relevant contact terms and conditions, including grievance and arbitration, and shall not be agenda items for the PRNC.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Difference of Opinion. In the case of a difference of opinion between the Client and the Consultant on any important matters involving professional judgment that might affect the proper evaluation or execution of the Project, the Client shall allow the Consultant to submit promptly to the Client a written report describing the issues and each of their opinions on them and, simultaneously, submit a copy of it to JICA. The Client shall forward the report to JICA with its comments to allow JICA to study it and communicate with the Client before any irreversible steps are taken on the matter. In case of urgency, the Consultant may request the Client and/or JICA that the matter be discussed immediately between the Client and JICA.
Sample 1
Difference of Opinion. Art. E 3 If the NMF and the user have any difference of opinion regarding the application of these General Terms and Conditions, the user can lodge a written objection with the NMF Supervisory Board. In certain cases, the Supervisory Board may obtain advice. The Supervisory Board shall endeavour to mediate and, where possible, propose a solution. If a dispute cannot be resolved by consultation, the District Court of Amsterdam shall in the first instance have exclusive jurisdiction to take cognisance of disputes. The loan agreement (of which these general terms and conditions form part) is governed by Dutch law. Confidential counsellor Art. E 4 In the event that the user is of the opinion that he/she has experienced discrimination, sexual intimidation, aggression and violence or bullying in his/her contact with the NMF office, the user can report this to the to the external confidential counsellor of the NMF, committed by contract, the Gimd company since June 2020. The reporting procedure [meldprocedure] is available on the NMF website. Acts or omissions in contravention of these conditions
Sample 1
Difference of Opinion. 23.1 All difference of opinion between the parties relating to the interpretation, application or administration of this Agreement which cannot be settled between the aggrieved employee and representative of the Employer shall be settled by arbitration as provided in the Ontario Labour Relations Act.
Sample 1
Difference of Opinion. Art. E 3 If the NMF and the user have any difference of opinion regarding the application of these General Terms and Conditions, the user can lodge a written objection with the NMF Supervisory Board. In certain cases, the Supervisory Board may obtain advice. The Supervisory Board shall endeavour to mediate and, where possible, propose a solution. If a dispute cannot be resolved by consultation, the District Court of Amsterdam shall in the first instance have exclusive jurisdiction to take cognisance of disputes. The loan agreement (of which these general terms and conditions form part) is governed by Dutch law.
Sample 1
Difference of Opinion. Art. E 7 If the NMF and the user have any difference of opinion regarding the application of these General Terms and Conditions, the user can lodge a written objection with the NMF Supervisory Board. In certain cases, the Supervisory Board may obtain advice, including soliciting a medical opinion. The Supervisory Board is authorised to make a decision regarding the dispute. The user is then obliged to abide by this decision. In the event that the user is of the opinion that he/she has experienced discrimination, sexual intimidation, aggression and violence or bullying in his/her contact with the NMF office, the user can likewise approach the Supervisory Board. Acts or omissions in contravention of these conditions Art. E 8 If the user infringes or fails to comply with any provision of the agreement, the agreement will be terminated without judicial intervention. The NMF is then entitled to immediately reclaim the instrument, without prejudice to the NMF’s right to claim any amounts the user may still owe the NMF under the terms of this agreement. In such a case, the user will be obliged to return the instrument to the NMF or a third party designated by the NMF, in a complete state and in good condition, without prejudice to the NMF’s right to have any damage to the instrument repaired at the user’s expense.
Sample 1
Difference of Opinion. Any difference of opinions that arise between the contract manager/Division Head, PAID/SNSICG and the contractor will be mutually discussed, and settled between the Group Director of SNSICG/SNPA, SAC, and the contractor. Any dispute that remains unresolved thereafter, will be referred to Director, SAC; and the decision of Director, SAC will be final and binding on the contractor on all such matters. 7. DURATION OF CONTRACT 8.1 The typical period of the contract will be THREE (03) YEARS from the date of award of the contract. SAC reserves the right to decide the minimum period of the contract at the time of award of contract. 8.2 The contract period of THREE (03) YEARS and the projected fabrication quantity as specified in annexure may be extended or increased based on mutual consent, depending on the need and exigencies subject to the agreed quality of technical services and other applicable terms and conditions. 8.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Difference of Opinion

  • REIT Opinion Parent shall have received a written opinion of Gxxxxxxxx Txxxxxx, LLP (or other counsel to Company reasonably acceptable to Parent), dated as of the Closing Date and in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to Parent, to the effect that, commencing with the Company’s taxable year ended December 31, 2009, the Company has been organized and operated in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code and its actual method of operation has enabled the Company to meet, through the Effective Time, the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code. Such opinion will be subject to customary exceptions, assumptions and qualifications and based on customary representations contained in an officer’s certificate executed by the Company, provided that Parent is given a reasonable opportunity to review such representations and finds them reasonably acceptable.

  • Section 368 Opinion The Company shall have received a written opinion of Gxxxxxxxx Traurig, LLP (or other counsel to the Company reasonably satisfactory to Parent), dated as of the Closing Date and in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Company, to the effect that, on the basis of the facts, representations and assumptions set forth or referred to in such opinion, the Merger will qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. In rendering the opinion described in this Section 7.3(e), counsel shall be entitled to require and rely upon customary representations contained in certificates of officers of the Company and Parent, reasonably satisfactory in form and substance to the Company and Parent.

  • FORM OF OPINION (a) The Company has been duly incorporated and is validly existing as a corporation in good standing under the laws of the state of its incorporation.

  • Delivery of Opinion The Company shall have caused the Company Counsel to furnish to the Manager its opinion and negative assurance statement, dated as of such date and addressed to the Manager in form and substance acceptable to the Manager.

  • Solvency Opinion The Administrative Agent shall have received, with a counterpart for each Lender, a solvency opinion reasonably satisfactory to the Agents from an independent valuation firm reasonably satisfactory to the Agents which shall document the solvency of Holdings and its Subsidiaries (including the Borrower) individually and taken together as a single entity, after giving effect to the Asset Contribution, the making of the Loans, the issuance of the Subordinated Debt and the other transactions contemplated hereby and by the Transaction Documents.

  • Federal Tax Opinion FNB shall have received the written opinion of its tax counsel, Xxxx Xxxxx LLP, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to FNB, dated the Closing Date, to the effect that, on the basis of facts, representations and assumptions set forth or referred to in such opinion, the Merger will qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. In rendering such opinion, counsel may require and rely upon representations contained in Tax Representation Letters executed by officers of HBI and FNB.

  • OPINION OF FUND'S INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT The Custodian shall take all reasonable action, as a Fund with respect to a Portfolio may from time to time request, to obtain from year to year favorable opinions from the Fund’s independent accountants with respect to its activities hereunder in connection with the preparation of the Fund’s Form N-1A or Form N-2, as applicable, and Form N-SAR or other annual reports to the SEC and with respect to any other requirements thereof.

  • Tax Opinion Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx LLP (or such other counsel satisfactory to the Representatives in their reasonable judgment), special tax counsel to the Depositor, will have furnished to the Representatives their written opinion, dated as of the Closing Date, in form and in substance satisfactory to the Representatives in their reasonable judgment, to the effect that:

  • Opinion On or before the Closing Date, the Master Servicer shall cause to be delivered to the Depositor, the Seller, the Trustee and any NIMS Insurer one or more Opinions of Counsel, dated the Closing Date, in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Depositor and Xxxxxx Brothers Inc., as to the due authorization, execution and delivery of this Agreement by the Master Servicer and the enforceability thereof.

  • Delivery of Opinion of Counsel in Connection with Substitutions (a) Notwithstanding any contrary provision of this Agreement, no substitution pursuant to Section 2.02 or 2.03 shall be made more than 90 days after the Closing Date unless the Seller delivers to the Trustee an Opinion of Counsel, which Opinion of Counsel shall not be at the expense of either the Trustee or the Trust Fund, addressed to the Trustee, to the effect that such substitution will not (i) result in the imposition of the tax on "prohibited transactions" on the Trust Fund or contributions after the Startup Date, as defined in sections 860F(a)(2) and 860G(d) of the Code, respectively or (ii) cause any REMIC created under this Agreement to fail to qualify as a REMIC at any time that any Certificates are outstanding.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.