Diagram. Web.dll Yes Syncfusion.Diagram.Windows.dll Yes Syncfusion.Diagram.Wpf.dll Yes Syncfusion.DLS.Base.dll Yes Syncfusion.DICOM.Base.dll Yes Syncfusion.DocIO.Base.dll Yes Syncfusion.DocIO.ClientProfile.dll Yes Syncfusion.DocIO.Helper.MVC.dll Yes Syncfusion.DocIO.Mvc.dll Yes Syncfusion.DocIO.Portable.dll Yes Syncfusion.DocIO.UWP.dll Yes Syncfusion.DocIO.Web.dll Yes Syncfusion.DocIO.Windows.dll Yes Syncfusion.DocIO.Wpf.dll Yes Syncfusion.DocIORenderer.Portable.dll Yes Syncfusion.DocToPDFConverter.Base.dll Yes Syncfusion.DocToPDFConverter.ClientProfile.dll Yes Syncfusion.Edit.MVVM.WPF.dll Yes Syncfusion.Edit.Windows.dll Yes Syncfusion.Edit.Wpf.dll Yes Syncfusion.EJ.dll Yes Syncfusion.EJ.DocumentEditor.dll Yes Syncfusion.EJ.Export.dll Yes
Diagram. This is a generic diagram showing the standard configuration and service demarcation points. It is not intended to represent every situation or detailed physical architecture. The following points should be noted: The Bitstream 4 service and pricing applies from the UNI to the E-NNI at the POI, i.e. there is no incremental charge from the intermediate POI to the POI. The Service Provider can request Tail Extension to extend the Bitstream 4 service to a remote POI. Some Bitstream Services will have a single tier of aggregation, i.e. there is no intermediate POI. Where there are multiple tiers of aggregation, Service Providers can pick the service up at an Intermediate POI. This intermediate POI will service a limited Coverage Area. Service Levels (availability, network performance) only apply to UNI to POI. Access node and aggregation interconnection may use redundant links to meet Service Level requirements. Service Description for Xxxxxxxxx 0 00 Xxxxxxxx 0000 Xxxxxxxx IEEE 802.3 – 2005. 802.1q supporting 0000 XXXXx. XXX XX00: o 100 Mbps = 100BaseT; o 1 Gbps = 1000Base-T; and o 10 Gbps = 10GBase-T. Glass Only: o 100 Mbps = 100Base-FX; or o 1 Gbps = 0000Xxxx-XX. XXX: o 9100 Bytes. UFB Handover Connection (E-NNI) Ethernet: 802.1ad VLAN (SVID, CVID); or Double taggedQnQ. VLAN Point-to-Point (E-APL); MTU: 9100 Bytes Unicast Frame Delivery = passed within service CIR. Multicast Frame Delivery = passed within service CIR. Broadcast Frame Delivery = passed within service CIR. Layer 2 Control Protocols Processing = limited (but may be amended by the LFC from time to time). Fibre External fibre must comply with ITU-T specification G.652D. Internal building fibres may comply with ITU-T G.657A. Fibre terminations must be SC/APC type connectors (complying with the IEC 61754-4 standard) or alternatively LC/APC type connectors (complying with the IEC 61754-20 standard) as appropriate. Laser types and path characteristics expected to be designed to a minimum standard which are contained in the documents IEEE 802.3 Section 5 standard. Testing for power loss will be at either 1310 or 1550 nm. 1625 nm reserved for non disruptive testing.
Diagram. Filing Revised Versions of Previous Year’s Forms: Timing of changes to a Form Filing. You may make any changes to the forms in your filing that are required to be made in response to an objection in that filing. Those changes may be made at any time between receipt of the Objection Letter and the “respond-by” date in the Objection Letter. The timing of changes to your filing for any other reason must be coordinated with the Analyst assigned to that filing. Failure to coordinate with your Analyst may interrupt (and thus delay) review of the filing or may require the Analyst to re-start review from the beginning. If you make a change that necessitates re-starting review from the beginning, that review will be prioritized according to the date of the change (not the date of the original filing). This will delay review of your filing. To coordinate timing of changes with your Analyst, you must send a Note to Reviewer in the form filing requesting to make the change. The Note to Reviewer must be sent in the filing you are requesting to change and include specific details of the change requested. If you are requesting to make a change to your form filing in response to an objection in the corresponding rate filing, your Note to Reviewer must also include the SERFF or State Tracking Number of that rate filing. Your Analyst will respond to your request in a Note to Filer. The Analyst may: (1) Authorize you to make the change immediately; (2) Request that you make the change later during the review process; or (3) Advise you of any specific compliance concerns about the change you requested. Do not make any modifications other than as specifically authorized by your Analyst in the Note to Filer. Filings modified without coordination with the Analyst may be treated as un-reviewed filings and prioritized according to the date of the unauthorized change (not the date of your original filing). This will delay review of your filing. Custom applications and enrollment forms (including web-based): Custom applications and enrollment forms filed for review must be attached, in final form, on the Form Schedule tab. You must complete the Form Name field on the Form Schedule tab using the following naming convention:
Diagram. Since φ-Correspondence is always between a head and a dependent of two identical features, I indicate it as ℛ[φ], where φ is the name of the feature value of the elements in correspondence.
Diagram. SHOWING CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH BOTH PARTIES Where an RGMA flow, for example asset works (ORJOB) or appointment (ONAGE) is sent from the supplier to the IGT, the flow will only have the required effect where the IGT MEM and supplier have the appropriate agreement in place. Requests (i.e. where an ORJOB would otherwise be sent by a supplier under a supplier-MEM contract) made under the IGT UNC metering contract with the shipper will be carried out using the existing agreed processes, for those services that both parties have agreed to be provided.
Diagram. This is a generic diagram showing the standard configuration and service demarcation points. It is not intended to represent every situation or detailed physical architecture. The following points should be noted: • not all circuits will pass through a cabinet or FFP; • the circuit will terminate within a 10m radius of ETP (unless otherwise arranged by Non Standard Install); and • in MDUs where the LFC has provided Premises fibre cabling, the demarcation point is the ETP in an End User Tenancy. Appendix B – Technical Specification Technical Specification Fibre External fibre must comply with ITU-T specification G.652D. Internal building fibres may comply with ITU-T G.657A but cable must meet appropriate fire regulations i.e. be Flame- Retardant, Non Corrosive, Low Smoke, No Halogen (FRNC/LSNH). Connector Type Fibre terminations must be SC/APC type connectors (complying with the IEC 61754-4 standard) or alternatively LC/APC also known as LCA type connectors (complying with the IEC 61754-20 standard) as appropriate. Optic Path Laser types and path characteristics expected to be designed to a minimum standard which are contained in the documents in LFC document ND0473 based on IEEE 802.3 Section 5 standard or ITU-T G.984.
Diagram. The diagram of the Leased Premises attached hereto as Exhibit C merely evidences existing or contemplated improvements. By attaching such diagram as an exhibit to this Lease, Landlord is in no way contracting or bound to maintain or construct improvements exactly as shown thereon or prohibited from making additional or different improvements.
Diagram. Filing Revised Versions of Previous Year’s Forms: You may not use Non-Administrative Variability to define product or plan design: Different products must be filed separately. Plans with different benefits are separate products. No benefits (such as adult dental or contraception) may be bracketed in Individual or Small Group plans. Different plans within each product may not be filed using any form of Non-Administrative variability or bracketing. Administrative Variability may be used in Individual or Small Group filings, including necessary Exchange and Off-Exchange eligibility language. Administrative Variability does not require a formal variability statement. Pediatric stand-alone dental plan (with Pediatric Dental EHB) for 2023 plan year: Scope of Section by TOI in SERFF: H10I.001 or H10G.001 Submission Requirements: You must use, with no variations, one of the following naming conventions (as appropriate) in the SERFF Product Name field on the General Information tab: Individual - EHB Dental - Both Inside and Outside Exchange. Individual - EHB Dental - Exchange Only. Individual - EHB Dental - Outside Exchange Only. Small Group - EHB Dental - Both Inside and Outside Exchange. Small Group - EHB Dental - Exchange Only. Small Group - EHB Dental - Outside Exchange Only. In the Corresponding Filing Tracking Number field, list the SERFF Tracking Number(s) of the corresponding rate filing(s) (public and separate not-for-public rate filing, if requested). DO NOT file Large and Small Group products combined. 2023 Cascade Care Standardized and Public Option Health Plans (RCW 43.71.095) Scope of Section by TOI in SERFF: H16I and HOrg02I This section applies to all Standardized (Cascade) and Public Option (Cascade Select) health plans to be offered through the Washington Health Benefit Exchange (WAHBE). Public Option Health Plans must use the Standardized Plan design. Standardized and Public Option Health Plans may only be marketed through the Exchange. Filing Instructions: Forms must be filed according to Section IV of these instructions, with the exception of: Standardized Health Plans: You must use the following naming convention in the Form Name field on the Form Schedule tab: “[Issuer Name] Cascade [Metal Level].” Public Option Health Plans: You must use the following naming convention in the Form Name field on the Form Schedule tab: “[Issuer Name] Cascade Select [Metal Level].” An issuer must contact the Exchange directly to discuss and receive approval fro...
Diagram. 7 EU exports to Mercosur (2018) and additional quotas Source: European Commission 2019 / GRAIN 2019 30,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 Tons 20,000 3,700 5,000 2,700 771 10,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 Cheese Milk powder Baby food EU exports → Mercosur Additional quotas represent a considerable increase compared with current EU exports: by a factor of eight for cheese and by a factor of thirteen for milk powder (see Diagram 7). In this respect, export-oriented milk producers within the EU would benefit particularly, since they would be able to sell a larger share of their surpluses in Mercosur. This prospect has already led to pro- tests by South American dairy farmers, who fear for their sales markets in the region. Argentinian milk producers, for example, have demanded that their industry be excluded from the planned agreement.24 The agricultural quotas for bioethanol and beef can also be expected to have substantial effects. The concessions for bioethanol, which in South America is mainly produced from sugar cane, consist of a duty-free quota of 450,000 tonnes for use in the chemical industry and a preferential tariff quota of 200,000 tonnes for use as a biofuel. These quotas are likely to stimulate a further expansion in the cultivation of sugar cane in Merco- sur, especially in Brazil, the world’s second largest producer and exporter of bioethanol xxxx the US. The Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture estimates that the land area on which sugar cane is cultivated could increase from 9 to 10 million hectares over the next ten years.25 This estimate does not even take into account the additional demand resulting from the EU-Mercosur Agreement. In terms of land use, sugar cane is the most important arable crop in Brazil, alongside soya and maize.26 Although sugar cane cultivation is concentrated in the south of the country, the fastest expansion is occurring in the central west and north-east of the country, especially in the species-rich Cerrado. President Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx further paved the way for this expansion when, in November 2019, he revoked a decree restricting sugar cane cultivation in Ama- xxxxx, the Cerrado, the Pantanal wetlands and in indigenous territories. The decree on Sugar Cane Agro-Ecological Zoning had been issued in 2009 by then President Xxxx xx Xxxxx.30 Particularly the in- digenous people of Brazil are victims of Xxxxxxxxx’s revocation of this decree (see box on this page).
Diagram of a vertical optical interconnect showing the location of the individual components (Bare et al., 1994)
