Develop and Administer Questionnaire Clause Samples

Develop and Administer Questionnaire. TWRI will oversee the development of a questionnaire to gauge the knowledge gained by the course participants. This questionnaire will be administered at the beginning and end of each short course to demonstrate the course’s effectiveness and identify areas of the course needing adjustment. a. The questionnaire used for the North Central Texas Watershed Management Training is being evaluated for potential modification and use.

Develop and Administer Questionnaire. TWRI will oversee the development of a questionnaire to gauge the knowledge gained by the course participants. This questionnaire will be administered at the beginning and end of each short course to demonstrate the course’s effectiveness and identify areas of the course needing adjustment. a. The short course evaluation (Appendix B) indicated that participants of the second short course were very satisfied with the course. On a scale of 1-5, the rating for the overall satisfaction of the short course was 4.43 (i.e. 87% satisfied). Ratings for individual presentations ranged from 3.70 – 4.66. b. The pre- / post-course exam again turned out to be very difficult for the course participants. The average on the pre-course exam was 58 and the average on the post- course exam was 71. The exam is being re-evaluated in preparation for the Third Course. The River Systems Institute is leading this effort. However, despite the difficulty of the exam, it did demonstrate an overall improvement in knowledge of almost 24%. Task 4.1: Draft Report a. No activity. Task 4.2: Final Report a. No activity.

Develop and Administer Questionnaire. TWRI will oversee the development of a questionnaire to gauge the knowledge gained by the course participants. This questionnaire will be administered at the beginning and end of each short course to demonstrate the course’s effectiveness and identify areas of the course needing adjustment. a. Forty-two evaluations were submitted by participants providing input on the course (Appendix D). On a scale of 1-5, ratings for presentations ranged from 3.6 – 4.7. Overall, the presentations averaged a 4.0 rating. b. The pre- / post-course exam turned out to be very difficult for the course participants. The average on the pre-course exam was 48 and the average on the post-course exam was 64. The exam is being re-evaluated in preparation for the Second Course. However, despite the difficulty of the exam, it did demonstrate an overall improvement in knowledge. Considering the experience level of the first group of participants, the 33.5% increase in knowledge is satisfactory. Task 4.1: Draft Report a. No activity. Task 4.2: Final Report a. No activity.