DETERMINING SEPARATION Sample Clauses
The "Determining Separation" clause outlines the process and criteria for establishing when and how parties to an agreement may formally end their relationship. Typically, this clause specifies the events or conditions that constitute grounds for separation, such as breach of contract, mutual agreement, or the occurrence of certain milestones. By clearly defining the procedures and triggers for separation, the clause helps prevent disputes and ensures both parties understand their rights and obligations if the relationship needs to be dissolved.
DETERMINING SEPARATION. For purposes of this section:
DETERMINING SEPARATION. (a) For purposes of this section:
(1) In instances where ratings are identified using numbers, a “2” shall be Unsatisfactory, a “3” shall be Satisfactory, a “4” shall be Excellent, and a “5” shall be Outstanding as defined in the Performance Evaluation Article.
(2) In instances where ratings are used to determine the order of layoff, employees with the same rating(s) or within the same rating groups and columns, will be separated according to seniority (most senior separated last).
(3) Volunteers need not be separated prior to laying off classified employees provided the volunteers do not assume the duties of the laid off employees.
(b) Order of Separation The order of separation of employees with permanent status shall be on a geographic basis by class and department in the following manner. For purposes of determining this order of separation, “geographic basis” shall be construed to mean that area within a thirty-five (35) road mile radius of the position’s regular duty station.
(1) Employees with less than three (3) years of continuous State service and whose current, annual performance evaluation is less than Satisfactory shall be separated first.
(2) Then, employees who have not received their first annual performance evaluation will be separated. These employees will be separated on the basis of their original probationary period evaluations and separated in order of their ratings, those rated above “Satisfactory” being separated last.
(3) Then, employees with only one (1) annual performance evaluation will be separated. These employees will be listed by order of their ratings, “Outstanding” being separated last.
(4) Then, employees with two (2) annual performance evaluations will be separated. Those employees will be placed in the following groups based on their performance ratings: 1. 2. 3. Group A: 2,2 3,2 2,3 Group B: 4/5,2 3,3 2,4/5 Group C: 4/5,3 3,4/5 4/5,4/5 The employees in Group A will be separated first, Group C last.
(5) Then, employees with more than three (3) and less than five (5) years of continuous State service will then be separated. The order of layoff of these employees will be based on seniority (the employee with the most seniority will be separated last), except in the following instance. An employee with any one (1) of the following combinations of ratings on his/her three (3) most recent annual performance evaluations will be separated last: 4/5 4/5 3 4/5 3 4/5 3 4/5 4/5 4/5 4/5 4/5 (6) Then, employees with five (5) or more...
DETERMINING SEPARATION. (a) For purposes of this section:
(1) In instances where ratings are identified using numbers, a “2” shall be Unsatisfactory, a “3” shall be Satisfactory, a “4” shall be Excellent, and a “5” shall be Outstanding as defined in the Performance Evaluation Article.
(2) In instances where ratings are used to determine the order of layoff, employees with the same rating(s) or within the same rating groups and columns, will be separated according to seniority (most senior separated last).
(3) Volunteers need not be separated prior to laying off classified employees provided the volunteers do not assume the duties of the laid off employees.
DETERMINING SEPARATION. (a) For purposes of this section:
(1) In instances where ratings are identified using numbers, a “ 2” shall be U nsatisfactory, a “ 3” shall be S atisfactory, a “ 4” sh all be E xcellent or “ 5” sh all be Outstanding as defined in the Performance Evaluation Article.
(2) In i nstances where r atings are use d t o de termine the or der of l ayoff, em ployees with t he same rating(s) or within the sa me r ating g roups and co lumns, will be se parated acco rding t o seniority (most senior separated last).
(3) Volunteers need not be se parated pr ior t o l aying of f cl assified em ployees provided t he volunteers do not assume the duties of the laid off employees.
(b) Order of Separation The order of separation of employees with permanent status shall be on a g eographic basis by class and depar tment i n t he f ollowing m anner. For pur poses of det ermining t his order of separation, “geographic basis” sh all be co nstrued ▇ ▇ ▇ ean t hat ar ea within a thirty-five ( 35) road mile radius of the position’s regular duty station.
(1) Employees with l ess than t hree (3) years of continuous State se rvice and w hose cu rrent, annual performance evaluation is less than Satisfactory shall be separated first.
(2) Then, em ployees who hav e not r eceived t heir f irst annual per formance ev aluation will be separated. These employees will be separated on the basis of their original probationary period evaluations and se parated i n or der of t heir r atings, t hose r ated abov e “ Satisfactory” bei ng separated last.
(3) Then, employees with only one (1) annual performance evaluation will be separated. These employees will be listed by order of their ratings, “Outstanding” being separated last.
(4) Then, em ployees with t wo (2) annual performance evaluations will be separated. Those employees will be placed in the following groups based on their performance ratings: 1. 2. 3. Group A: 2,2 3,2 2,3 Group B: 4/5,2 3,3 2,4/5 Group C: 4/5,3 3,4/5 4/5,4/5 The employees in Group A will be separated first, Group C last.
(5) Then, employees with more than three (3) and l ess than five (5) years of continuous State service will then be separated. The order of layoff of these employees will be based on seniority (the employee with the most seniority will be se parated last), except in the f ollowing instance. An employee with any one (1) of the following combinations of ratings on his/her three (3) most recent annual performance evaluations will be separated last: 4/5 4/5 3 4...