Derivations Sample Clauses

Derivations. A portion of the above described property was heretofore conveyed to First National Bank of Spartanburg, Div. of First National Bank of the South by deed of Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxxx recorded on February 8, 2005 in Deed Book 82-G, at Page 702, aforesaid records. Tax Map Number: 7-12-07-158.00 A portion of the above described property was heretofore conveyed to First National Bank of the South by deed of Xxxxx X. Xxxxx recorded October 13, 2005 in Deed Book 84-D, at Page 524, aforesaid records. Tax Map Number: 7-12-07-161.00 A portion of the above described property was heretofore conveyed to First National Bank of the South by deeds recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds for Spartanburg County, S. C. in Deed Book 72-G at Page 464; Deed Book 72-G at Page 465; and Deed Book 72-G at Page 466. Tax Map Numbers: P/O 7-12-07-147.00; P/O 7-12-07-147.01 and also 7-12-07-157.00 A portion of the above described property was heretofore conveyed to FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SPARTANBURG by deed of HBJ PROPERTIES, A SOUTH CAROLINA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, dated February 22, 2000, recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds for Spartanburg County, S. C. in Deed Book 71-N, at Page 609. Tax Map Number: 7-12-07-168.00 A portion of the above described property was heretofore conveyed to First National Bank of Spartanburg by deed recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds for Spartanburg County, S. C. in Deed Book 83-G at Page 402. Portions of the above described property was heretofore conveyed to First National Bank of Spartanburg by Road Closure Order recorded in Deed Book 72-F at Page 624.) Tax Map Number: 7-12-07-156.00 A portion of the above described property was heretofore conveyed to First National Bank of Spartanburg by deed recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds for Spartanburg County, S. C. in Deed Book 84-E at Page 180. Portions of the above described property was heretofore conveyed to First National Bank of Spartanburg by Road Closure Order recorded in Deed Book 84-P at Page 302.) Tax Map Numbers: 7-12-7-153.00 and 7-12-7-154.00 Boiling Springs Road Property: ALSO: ALL that lot, piece or parcel of land located in the State of South Carolina, County of Spartanburg, at Boiling Springs, located at the northeastern quadrant of the intersection of Boiling Springs Road (S. C. Highway No. 9) and Xxxxx Avenue, containing 0.946 acres, more or less, and being more particularly shown on plat of survey made for First National Bank of Spartanb...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Derivations. This is a portion of the property conveyed to Cape Fear Wood Corporation (now Canal Industries, Inc. by merger dated 9/1/69) by deed from Smith Creek Development Company recorded in Book 793, Page 351, and to Xxxx Wood Corporation (now Canal Industries, Inc. by merger dated 9/1/69) by deed from Smith Creek Development Company of even date recorded in Deed Book 793, Xxxe 356, and being the identical property conveyed to Cape Fear Wood Corporation in those certain deeds from Willard I. Herring and wife, Tilda G. Herring recorded in Book 802, Paxx 00 xxx xxxx Xxxus McPhail Xxxxxxx xxxxxxxx in Book 805 at Page 332, and being a poxxxxx xx xxx xxxxxxxx conveyed to Cape Fear Wood Corporation by deed from Maude P. Turlington recorded in Book 794, Page 494. Also being that prxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xx Cape Fear Wood Corporation to Sampson County Disposal, Inc. by deed recorded in Book 1150, Page 39, Xxxxxxx County Registry.
Sample 1
Derivations. The preceding discussion guarantees that plural agreement is never possible when the CNP does not c-command the target of agreement and so LF-visibility is entailed by the system. If the CNP is to be interpreted in a position lower than the target (e.g., T0), the iF feature will not c-command it, and therefore be in a position inaccessible for the target to value via Reverse Agree. To see exactly why we have explained the restrictions on plural agreement with CNPs, allow me to walk through the relevant derivations. Firstly, we can very simply see that there cannot ever be any plural agreement in existential constructions where a CNP is the associate. Recall from den Dikken’s (1995) examples given in (17) above, the associate in existential constructions is interpreted with narrow scope relative to T0, and is of course pronounced in the same position. Showing the position of the number features of the CNP in the grey boxes in the below trees, we can see that the iF cannot be accessed by T0 as the valued feature does not c-command the unvalued feature of T. Reverse Agree therefore will not yield a value for T and it must wait until morphology to get a number value. In this case it will be valued singular, because the singular feature is accessible, with agreement going either way:
Sample 1
Derivations. Where the context permits, derivations of terms defined herein shall have a meaning corresponding to the meaning of the defined term.
Sample 1

Related to Derivations

  • Derivatives Where a term is defined herein, a capitalized derivative of such term shall have a corresponding meaning unless the context otherwise requires.

  • Translations In the event of any discrepancy, misstatement, omission or error appearing in the various translations on the particulars and condition herein, the English version shall prevail.

  • Derivative Works Constellation Beers shall acquire no ownership rights in the Licensed Intellectual Property or derivative works based thereon or any intellectual property deemed to be owned by Marcas Modelo or Modelo Group as a result of this Agreement. Constellation Beers shall, at any time requested by Marcas Modelo or Modelo Group, whether during or subsequent to the term hereof, disclaim in writing any such property interest or ownership in the Licensed Intellectual Property.

  • Combinations If the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding at any time after the date first referenced above is decreased by a combination of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, then, following the record date of such combination, the Warrant Price shall be appropriately increased and the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of this Warrant shall be decreased in proportion to such decrease in outstanding shares.

  • Works Contractor must notify the Department or State of Florida of any publications, artwork, or other copyrightable works developed in connection with the Contract. All copyrights created or developed through performance of the Contract are owned solely by the State of Florida.

  • Developments a) Employee will make full and prompt disclosure to Employer of all inventions, improvements, discoveries, methods, developments, software and works of authorship, whether patentable or not, which are created, made, conceived, reduced to practice by Employee or under his direction or jointly with others during his employment by Employer, whether or not during normal working hours or on the premises of Employer which relate to the business of Employer as conducted from time to time (all of which are collectively referred to in this Agreement as "Developments").

  • Divisions For all purposes under the Loan Documents, in connection with any division or plan of division under Delaware law (or any comparable event under a different jurisdiction’s laws): (a) if any asset, right, obligation or liability of any Person becomes the asset, right, obligation or liability of a different Person, then it shall be deemed to have been transferred from the original Person to the subsequent Person, and (b) if any new Person comes into existence, such new Person shall be deemed to have been organized on the first date of its existence by the holders of its Equity Interests at such time.

  • Discoveries 20.1 Anything of historical or other interest or of significant value unexpectedly discovered on the Site is the property of the Employer. The Contractor is to notify the Engineer of such discoveries and carry out the Engineer's instructions for dealing with them.

  • Copyrights As to any deliverables containing copyrightable subject matter, the Contractor agrees that upon their creation, such deliverables shall be considered as work made-for-hire by the Contractor for the City and the City shall own all copyrights in and to such deliverables, provided however, that nothing in this Paragraph 38 shall negate the City’s sole or joint ownership of any such deliverables arising by virtue of the City’s sole or joint authorship of such deliverables. Should by operation of law, such deliverables not be considered works made-for-hire, the Contractor hereby assigns to the City (and agrees to cause each of its employees providing services to the City hereunder to execute, acknowledge, and deliver an assignment to the City of) all worldwide right, title, and interest in and to such deliverables. With respect to such work made- for-hire, the Contractor agrees to execute, acknowledge, and deliver and cause each of its employees providing services to the City hereunder to execute, acknowledge, and deliver a work- made-for-hire agreement, in a form to be reasonably approved by the City, to the City upon delivery of such deliverables to the City or at such other time as the City may request.

  • Trademarks The Company name, the Company logo, and all related names, logos, product and service names, designs, and slogans are trademarks of the Company or its affiliates or licensors. You must not use such marks without the prior written permission of the Company. All other names, logos, product and service names, designs, and slogans on this Website are the trademarks of their respective owners.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.