Derivations Sample Clauses
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Derivations. The preceding discussion guarantees that plural agreement is never possible when the CNP does not c-command the target of agreement and so LF-visibility is entailed by the system. If the CNP is to be interpreted in a position lower than the target (e.g., T0), the iF feature will not c-command it, and therefore be in a position inaccessible for the target to value via Reverse Agree. To see exactly why we have explained the restrictions on plural agreement with CNPs, allow me to walk through the relevant derivations. Firstly, we can very simply see that there cannot ever be any plural agreement in existential constructions where a CNP is the associate. Recall from den Dikken’s (1995) examples given in (17) above, the associate in existential constructions is interpreted with narrow scope relative to T0, and is of course pronounced in the same position. Showing the position of the number features of the CNP in the grey boxes in the below trees, we can see that the iF cannot be accessed by T0 as the valued feature does not c-command the unvalued feature of T. Reverse Agree therefore will not yield a value for T and it must wait until morphology to get a number value. In this case it will be valued singular, because the singular feature is accessible, with agreement going either way:
Derivations. A portion of the above described property was heretofore conveyed to First National Bank of Spartanburg, Div. of First National Bank of the South by deed of ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ recorded on February 8, 2005 in Deed Book 82-G, at Page 702, aforesaid records. Tax Map Number: 7-12-07-158.00 A portion of the above described property was heretofore conveyed to First National Bank of the South by deed of ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ recorded October 13, 2005 in Deed Book 84-D, at Page 524, aforesaid records. Tax Map Number: 7-12-07-161.00 A portion of the above described property was heretofore conveyed to First National Bank of the South by deeds recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds for Spartanburg County, S. C. in Deed Book 72-G at Page 464; Deed Book 72-G at Page 465; and Deed Book 72-G at Page 466. Tax Map Numbers: P/O 7-12-07-147.00; P/O 7-12-07-147.01 and also 7-12-07-157.00 A portion of the above described property was heretofore conveyed to FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SPARTANBURG by deed of HBJ PROPERTIES, A SOUTH CAROLINA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, dated February 22, 2000, recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds for Spartanburg County, S. C. in Deed Book 71-N, at Page 609. Tax Map Number: 7-12-07-168.00 A portion of the above described property was heretofore conveyed to First National Bank of Spartanburg by deed recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds for Spartanburg County, S. C. in Deed Book 83-G at Page 402. Portions of the above described property was heretofore conveyed to First National Bank of Spartanburg by Road Closure Order recorded in Deed Book 72-F at Page 624.) Tax Map Number: 7-12-07-156.00 A portion of the above described property was heretofore conveyed to First National Bank of Spartanburg by deed recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds for Spartanburg County, S. C. in Deed Book 84-E at Page 180. Portions of the above described property was heretofore conveyed to First National Bank of Spartanburg by Road Closure Order recorded in Deed Book 84-P at Page 302.) Tax Map Numbers: 7-12-7-153.00 and 7-12-7-154.00 ALSO: ALL that lot, piece or parcel of land located in the State of South Carolina, County of Spartanburg, at Boiling Springs, located at the northeastern quadrant of the intersection of Boiling Springs Road (S. C. Highway No. 9) and ▇▇▇▇▇ Avenue, containing 0.946 acres, more or less, and being more particularly shown on plat of survey made for First National Bank of Spartanburg dated August 15, 2000 by ▇▇...
Derivations. Where the context permits, derivations of terms defined herein shall have a meaning corresponding to the meaning of the defined term.
Derivations. A portion of the above described property was heretofore conveyed to First National Bank of Spartanburg, Div. of First National Bank of the South by deed of ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ recorded on February 8, 2005 in Deed Book 82-G, at Page 702, aforesaid records.
Derivations. This is a portion of the property conveyed to Cape Fear Wood Corporation (now Canal Industries, Inc. by merger dated 9/1/69) by deed from Smith Creek Development Company recorded in Book 793, Page 351, and to ▇▇▇▇ Wood Corporation (now Canal Industries, Inc. by merger dated 9/1/69) by deed from Smith Creek Development Company of even date recorded in Deed Book 793, ▇▇▇e 356, and being the identical property conveyed to Cape Fear Wood Corporation in those certain deeds from Willard I. Herring and wife, Tilda G. Herring recorded in Book 802, Pa▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇us McPhail ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ in Book 805 at Page 332, and being a po▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ conveyed to Cape Fear Wood Corporation by deed from Maude P. Turlington recorded in Book 794, Page 494. Also being that pr▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ Cape Fear Wood Corporation to Sampson County Disposal, Inc. by deed recorded in Book 1150, Page 39, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ County Registry.