DECISION AND ORDER. Pursuant to the City Council's authority as provided in Meridian City Code§ 11-SA and based upon the above and foregoing Findings of Fact which are herein adopted, it is hereby ordered that:
DECISION AND ORDER. The Federal Trade Commission (“Commission”) having initiated an investigation of the acquisition by Respondent BP Amoco p.l.c. of Respondent Atlantic Richfield Company, and Respondents having been furnished thereafter with draft of Complaint that the Bureau of Competition presented to the Commission for its consideration and which, if issued, would charge Respondents with violations of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 45, and Section 7 of the Xxxxxxx Act, as amended 15 U.S.C. § 18; and Respondents, their attorneys, and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an Agreement Containing Consent Orders (“Consent Agreement”), containing an admission by Respondents of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the aforesaid draft of Complaint, a statement that the signing of said Consent Agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by Respondents that the law has been violated as alleged in such Complaint, or that the facts as alleged in such Complaint, other than jurisdictional facts, are true, and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission’s Rules; and The Commission having thereafter considered the matter and having determined that it had reason to believe that Respondents have violated said Acts, and that a Complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect, and having thereupon issued its Complaint and an Order to Hold Separate and Maintain Assets, and having accepted the executed Consent Agreement and placed such Consent Agreement on the public record for a period of thirty (30) days for the receipt and consideration of public comments, now in further conformity with the procedure described in Commission Rule 2.34, 16 C.F.R. § 2.34, the Commission hereby makes the following jurisdictional finding and issues the following Order:
DECISION AND ORDER. Seller hereby grants to Buyer any of the rights that it is required to grant to Buyer pursuant to the Decision and Order.
DECISION AND ORDER. 1. In pertinent part, basic permits issued pursuant to the Federal Alcohol Administration Act are conditioned upon compliance with the requirements of 27 U.S.C. §§ 205 and 206 “and with all other Federal laws relating to distilled spirits, wine, and malt beverages, including taxes with respect thereto.” 27 U.S.C. § 204(d).
DECISION AND ORDER. The Federal Trade Commission (“Commission”) having heretofore issued its complaint charging XXX.Xxxxxxxx Corporation (“Respondent”) with violations of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, and Section 7 of the Xxxxxxx Act, as amended, and Respondent having been served with a copy of that complaint, together with a notice of contemplated relief, and Respondent having answered the complaint denying said charges and asserting affirmative defenses but admitting the jurisdictional allegations set forth therein; and The Respondent, its attorneys, and counsel for the Commission having thereafter executed an agreement containing a consent order, an admission by the Respondent of all the jurisdictional facts set forth in the complaint, a statement that the signing of said agreement is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by Respondent that the law has been violated as alleged in such complaint, or that the facts as alleged in such complaint, other than jurisdictional facts, are true and waivers and other provisions as required by the Commission’s Rules; and
DECISION AND ORDER. The Permanent Judicial Commission of the Synod of Southern California and Hawaii sustains each and all of the alleged irregularities. While the precipitate action of the church and the Presbytery prevents us from recovering the wrongly transferred property, except by civil action, the Commission can provide the appropriate order under ecclesiastical authority. Accordingly, the action of the Presbytery of Riverside on March 18, 2017, transferring Idyllwild Community Presbyterian Church of Idyllwild, CA to A Covenant Order of Evangelical Presbyterians (ECO) Presbytery of Southern California is set aside and is of no effect. It is also ordered that the Gracious Discernment, Dismissal and Transfer Policy should be revised to deny any transfer of church property before 31 days and the Presbytery to act on no dismissal of a church with property until such time as the policy is revised to reflect the change. FURTHERMORE, the Permanent Judicial Commission of the Synod of Southern California and Hawaii hereby orders all churches and presbyteries under its jurisdiction, to rely on the Constitution of the PC(USA) as it conducts its business. In particular, the churches and presbyteries that comprise the Synod of Southern California and Hawaii are to use caution in exercising their fiduciary duties, and to be cognizant of the fact that breach of fiduciary duty can result in civil and criminal liability, both corporate and individual.
DECISION AND ORDER. The attached Stipulated Settlement and Disciplinary Order is hereby adopted by the Board of Pharmacy, Department of Consumer Affairs, as its Decision in this matter. This Decision shall become effective at 5:00 p.m. on September 9, 2016. It is so ORDERED on August 10, 2016. BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS STATE OF CALIFORNIA Ashc forting By Xxx Xxxxxxxxx, Pharm.D. Board President XXXXXX X. XXXXXX Attorney General of California N XXXXX XXXXXXXX Supervising Deputy Attorney General w XXX X. XXXXXXX Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 116945 0000 Xxxx Xxxxxx, 00xx Xxxxx P.O. Box 70550 Oakland, CA 00000-0000 Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Facsimile: (000) 000-0000 E-mail: xxx.xxxxxxx@xxx.xx.xxx Attorneys for Complainant BEFORE THE BOARD OF PHARMACY DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 10 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 11 In the Matter of the Accusation Against: 12 GOLDEN GATE PHARMACY 00 0000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx San Francisco, CA 94122 14 Pharmacy Permit No. PHY 38113 15 YOW XXX XXX 0000 Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx 16 San Francisco, CA 94122 Pharmacist License No. RPH 43206 Case No. 5502 OAH Case-No. 2016010535- STIPULATED SETTLEMENT AND DISCIPLINARY ORDER Respondent. 19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties to the above- 20 entitled proceedings that the following matters are true:
DECISION AND ORDER. On July 5, 2011, this Court denied the government’s motion for a preliminary injunction against Defendants NCR and Appleton Papers Inc. In doing so, I found that although the government had set forth grounds for relief against NCR, it had not done so against Appleton Papers because it was unlikely that Appleton Papers had successor liability under CERCLA. Appleton Papers (“API”) has now moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability. For the reasons given below, I will deny the motion.
DECISION AND ORDER. The proposed assessment is sustained. The file is to be returned to the appropriate section of the Department for further proceedings in accordance with this Administrative Decision and applicable law. Pursuant to Ark. Code Xxx. § 00-00-000 (Supp. 2019), unless the Taxpayer requests in writing within twenty (20) days of the mailing of this decision that the Commissioner of Revenues revise the decision of the Administrative Law Judge, this Administrative Decision shall be effective and become the action of the agency.
