Common use of Data Quality Reviews Clause in Contracts

Data Quality Reviews. Data Quality Reviews (“DQR”) are a mechanism to review and analyze the utility, objectivity, and integrity of performance information. DQRs are to cover: (a) quality of data, (b) data collection instruments, (c) survey sampling methodology, (d) data collection procedures, (e) data entry, storage and retrieval processes, (f) data manipulation and analyses, and (g) data dissemination. MCC requires that an independent entity conduct the DQR, such as a local or international specialized firm or research organization, or an individual consultant, depending on the size of the program or project in review. The frequency and timing of data quality reviews must be set forth in the M&E Plan; however, MCC may request a DQR at any time. DQRs should be timed to occur before or early enough in the term of this Agreement that meaningful remedial measures (if any) may be taken depending on the results of the review. The methodology for the review should include a mix of document and record reviews, site visits, key informant interviews, and focus groups.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Threshold Program Grant Agreement, Threshold Program Grant Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Data Quality Reviews. Data Quality Reviews (DQR) are a mechanism to review and analyze the utility, objectivity, and integrity of performance information. DQRs are to cover: (a) quality of data, (b) data collection instruments, (c) survey sampling methodology, (d) data collection procedures, (e) data entry, storage and retrieval processes, (f) data manipulation and analyses, and (g) data dissemination. MCC requires that an independent entity conduct the DQR, such as a local or international specialized firm or research organization, or an individual consultant, depending on the size of the program or project in under review. The frequency and timing of data quality reviews must be set forth in the M&E Plan; however, MCC may request a DQR at any time. DQRs should be timed to occur before or early enough in the term of this Agreement Compact Term that meaningful remedial measures (if any) may be taken depending on the results of the review. The methodology for the review should include a mix of document and record reviews, site visits, key informant interviews, and focus groups.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: assets.mcc.gov

Data Quality Reviews. Data Quality Reviews (“DQR”DQRs) are a mechanism to review and analyze the utility, objectivity, and integrity of performance information. DQRs are to cover: (a) quality of data, (b) data collection instruments, (c) survey sampling methodology, (d) data collection procedures, (e) data entry, storage and retrieval processes, (f) data manipulation and analyses, and (g) data dissemination. MCC requires that an independent entity conduct the DQR, such as a local or international specialized firm or research organization, or an individual consultant, depending on the size of the program Program or project Project in review. The frequency and timing of data quality reviews must be set forth in the M&E Plan; however, however MCC may request a DQR at any time. DQRs should be timed to occur before or early enough in the term of this Agreement Compact Term that meaningful remedial measures (if any) may be taken depending on the results of the review. The methodology for the review should include a mix of document and record reviews, site visits, key informant interviews, and focus groups.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: assets.mcc.gov

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Data Quality Reviews. Data Quality Reviews (“DQR”) are a mechanism to review and analyze the utility, objectivity, and integrity of performance information. DQRs are to cover: (a) quality of data, (b) data collection instruments, (c) survey sampling methodology, (d) data collection procedures, (e) data entry, storage and retrieval processes, (f) data manipulation and analyses, and (g) data dissemination. MCC requires that an independent entity conduct the DQR, such as a local or international specialized firm or research organization, or an individual consultant, depending on the size of the program Program or project Project in review. The frequency and timing of data quality reviews must be set forth in the M&E Plan; however, however MCC may request a DQR at any time. DQRs should be timed to occur before or early enough in the term of this Agreement Compact Term so that meaningful remedial measures (if any) may be taken taken, depending on the results of the review. The methodology for the review should include a mix of document and record reviews, site visits, key informant interviews, and focus groups.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: assets.mcc.gov

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.