{"component": "clause", "props": {"groups": [{"samples": [{"hash": "f2wUC4cxF8V", "uri": "/contracts/f2wUC4cxF8V#cumulative-impacts", "label": "Grant Agreement", "score": 27.119096756, "published": true}, {"hash": "caY2E285N1I", "uri": "/contracts/caY2E285N1I#cumulative-impacts", "label": "Grant Agreement", "score": 26.9698829651, "published": true}, {"hash": "7gJ6gODHRCj", "uri": "/contracts/7gJ6gODHRCj#cumulative-impacts", "label": "Shoreline Master Program", "score": 26.5058612823, "published": true}], "size": 8, "snippet_links": [{"key": "reasonably-foreseeable-future", "type": "definition", "offset": [60, 89]}], "snippet": "The impact of all development in a specific area within the reasonably foreseeable future.", "hash": "6cbfc524cd9bcebad3db08ff896b4657", "id": 1}, {"samples": [{"hash": "2weU5n1BU69", "uri": "/contracts/2weU5n1BU69#cumulative-impacts", "label": "Conservation Agreement", "score": 29.8755607605, "published": true}, {"hash": "kCj8KUfb1fm", "uri": "/contracts/kCj8KUfb1fm#cumulative-impacts", "label": "Conservation Agreement", "score": 24.4387397766, "published": true}], "size": 3, "snippet_links": [{"key": "potential-impacts", "type": "definition", "offset": [31, 48]}, {"key": "reasonably-foreseeable", "type": "clause", "offset": [130, 152]}, {"key": "covered-area", "type": "clause", "offset": [168, 180]}, {"key": "future-actions", "type": "clause", "offset": [239, 253]}, {"key": "reasonably-certain", "type": "definition", "offset": [263, 281]}, {"key": "permit-term", "type": "clause", "offset": [332, 343]}, {"key": "being-conducted", "type": "definition", "offset": [521, 536]}, {"key": "the-primary", "type": "clause", "offset": [538, 549]}, {"key": "covered-activities", "type": "definition", "offset": [643, 661]}, {"key": "table-1", "type": "clause", "offset": [667, 674]}, {"key": "associated-with", "type": "definition", "offset": [844, 859]}, {"key": "review-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [907, 916]}, {"key": "strategic-plans", "type": "clause", "offset": [949, 964]}, {"key": "land-use-plans", "type": "clause", "offset": [985, 999]}, {"key": "government-websites", "type": "clause", "offset": [1001, 1020]}, {"key": "geographic-information-system", "type": "clause", "offset": [1025, 1054]}, {"key": "transportation-plans", "type": "clause", "offset": [1080, 1100]}, {"key": "management-plans", "type": "definition", "offset": [1121, 1137]}, {"key": "conservation-management", "type": "definition", "offset": [1152, 1175]}, {"key": "future-growth", "type": "definition", "offset": [1282, 1295]}, {"key": "and-development", "type": "clause", "offset": [1296, 1311]}, {"key": "operation-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [1330, 1342]}, {"key": "maintenance-and-operation", "type": "clause", "offset": [1403, 1428]}, {"key": "renewable-energy", "type": "clause", "offset": [1516, 1532]}, {"key": "and-address", "type": "clause", "offset": [1624, 1635]}, {"key": "water-shortages", "type": "clause", "offset": [1636, 1651]}, {"key": "table-8", "type": "definition", "offset": [1697, 1704]}, {"key": "covered-species", "type": "clause", "offset": [1706, 1721]}, {"key": "conservation-plan", "type": "definition", "offset": [1728, 1745]}, {"key": "conservation-program", "type": "clause", "offset": [1832, 1852]}, {"key": "private-landowner", "type": "definition", "offset": [1871, 1888]}, {"key": "the-funding", "type": "clause", "offset": [1940, 1951]}, {"key": "conservation-measures", "type": "clause", "offset": [1974, 1995]}, {"key": "sand-mining", "type": "definition", "offset": [2218, 2229]}, {"key": "energy-operations", "type": "definition", "offset": [2244, 2261]}, {"key": "department-of-agriculture", "type": "definition", "offset": [2281, 2306]}, {"key": "to-generate", "type": "definition", "offset": [2400, 2411]}, {"key": "marketing-opportunities", "type": "clause", "offset": [2412, 2435]}, {"key": "increase-funding", "type": "clause", "offset": [2462, 2478]}, {"key": "assistance-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [2479, 2492]}, {"key": "rural-communities", "type": "clause", "offset": [2493, 2510]}, {"key": "economic-development", "type": "clause", "offset": [2537, 2557]}, {"key": "comprehensive-plan", "type": "definition", "offset": [2565, 2583]}, {"key": "zoning-ordinances", "type": "clause", "offset": [2766, 2783]}, {"key": "city-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [2821, 2828]}, {"key": "residential-land-use", "type": "definition", "offset": [2886, 2906]}, {"key": "population-growth", "type": "definition", "offset": [2974, 2991]}, {"key": "commercial-uses", "type": "definition", "offset": [3004, 3019]}, {"key": "oil-and-gas-activities", "type": "clause", "offset": [3027, 3049]}], "snippet": "\u200c This analysis also considers potential impacts on resources from the 2020 DSL CCAA, when combined with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable actions in the Covered Area. Reasonably foreseeable actions include planned or funded future actions that are reasonably certain to occur or continue occurring over the requested Permit term. These include reasonably foreseeable projects that would result in cumulative impacts as defined under the 1978 NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1508.7) under which this evaluation is being conducted. The primary past, present, and reasonably foreseeable actions in the Covered Area are the aforementioned Covered Activities (see Table 1). These actions, and their associated potential impacts, are anticipated to continue to occur regardless of this 2020 DSL CCAA. Other reasonably foreseeable actions not associated with the Covered Activities were identified through review of existing and approved statewide strategic plans; local and regional land use plans; government websites and geographic information system (GIS) data; county-level transportation plans; county-level water management plans; and regional conservation management plans. These include implementation of goals, objectives, and guidance to support agriculture and overall future growth and development; construction and operation of transmission pipelines and oil and gas \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587; construction, maintenance and operation of electric powerlines; upgrades to and expansions of existing roadway infrastructure; renewable energy development; and new and expanded water resource infrastructure to meet irrigation demands and address water shortages. These actions and projects are described in Table 8. Covered Species Texas Conservation Plan Conservation for the Dunes Sagebrush Lizard (TCP) All Covered Area Counties Voluntary conservation program that incentivizes private landowner participation through avoidance of DSL Habitat and the funding and implementation of Conservation Measures. The existing TCP Covered Area overlaps with the Covered Area of the 2020 DSL CCAA and includes activities associated with oil and gas and agriculture and ranching but does not establish specific conservation measures for sand mining and renewable energy operations. Agriculture Texas Department of Agriculture Strategic Plan (2019\u20132023) Statewide Establishes goals, objectives, and performance measures to generate marketing opportunities for Texas agriculture and increase funding/assistance to rural communities and businesses. Land Use/ Economic Development Odessa Comprehensive Plan Ector County Provides guidance for future growth, development, land use, infrastructure, and services in Odessa. Identifies needed redevelopment areas, updated roadway standards and zoning ordinances. Land Use/ Economic Development 2013 City of \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 Comprehensive Plan \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 County Estimates that residential land use would comprise the largest land use, with an estimated 1-3% annual population growth, as well as commercial uses due to oil and gas activities in the Permian Basin.", "hash": "00aff13160710299b2a979c047b4e9a8", "id": 2}, {"samples": [{"hash": "3guUxJX1Nn", "uri": "/contracts/3guUxJX1Nn#cumulative-impacts", "label": "Professional Services Agreement", "score": 31.7020492554, "published": true}], "size": 3, "snippet_links": [{"key": "contractor-shall", "type": "clause", "offset": [9, 25]}, {"key": "the-resource", "type": "definition", "offset": [76, 88]}, {"key": "county-staff", "type": "definition", "offset": [144, 156]}, {"key": "coordinate-with-other-agencies", "type": "clause", "offset": [162, 192]}, {"key": "reasonably-foreseeable", "type": "clause", "offset": [221, 243]}, {"key": "related-development", "type": "definition", "offset": [244, 263]}, {"key": "based-on", "type": "definition", "offset": [264, 272]}, {"key": "land-use-plans", "type": "clause", "offset": [282, 296]}, {"key": "a-list", "type": "definition", "offset": [304, 310]}, {"key": "under-construction", "type": "definition", "offset": [359, 377]}, {"key": "docusign-envelope", "type": "definition", "offset": [380, 397]}, {"key": "description-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [534, 548]}, {"key": "cumulative-effects", "type": "definition", "offset": [549, 567]}, {"key": "determine-whether", "type": "clause", "offset": [572, 589]}, {"key": "project-contribution", "type": "definition", "offset": [594, 614]}, {"key": "cumulatively-considerable", "type": "definition", "offset": [618, 643]}], "snippet": "A.1.13.1 CONTRACTOR shall evaluate the impacts of cumulative development on the resource issues evaluated in the EIR while working closely with County staff, and coordinate with other agencies as appropriate, to identify reasonably foreseeable related development based on existing land use plans and/or a list of cumulative projects (proposed, approved, and under construction). DocuSign Envelope ID: 86A66717-9A24-4BA4-9218-EA0F857977A3 DocuSign Envelope ID: CB500CB5-EAC5-4A51-9EEC-B42F0E746575\nA.1.13.2 CONTRACTOR shall include a description of cumulative effects and determine whether the project contribution is cumulatively considerable.", "hash": "7358251fe8edd074f1dc25f71776a45a", "id": 3}, {"samples": [{"hash": "2QSLL1xSkvq", "uri": "/contracts/2QSLL1xSkvq#cumulative-impacts", "label": "Northern Spotted Owl Safe Harbor Agreement", "score": 18.4223136902, "published": true}, {"hash": "l8I8tXVWTfj", "uri": "/contracts/l8I8tXVWTfj#cumulative-impacts", "label": "Northern Spotted Owl Safe Harbor Agreement", "score": 18.3127994537, "published": true}], "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-environment", "type": "clause", "offset": [63, 78]}, {"key": "future-actions", "type": "clause", "offset": [197, 211]}, {"key": "significant-actions", "type": "clause", "offset": [386, 405]}, {"key": "period-of-time", "type": "clause", "offset": [429, 443]}, {"key": "the-cumulative", "type": "clause", "offset": [445, 459]}, {"key": "scope-of-this", "type": "clause", "offset": [505, 518]}, {"key": "related-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [613, 623]}, {"key": "habitat-enhancement", "type": "clause", "offset": [648, 667]}, {"key": "protection-measures", "type": "clause", "offset": [672, 691]}, {"key": "the-applicants", "type": "clause", "offset": [716, 730]}, {"key": "forest-management-activities", "type": "definition", "offset": [732, 760]}, {"key": "according-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [771, 783]}, {"key": "forest-practices-rules", "type": "definition", "offset": [806, 828]}, {"key": "the-basis", "type": "clause", "offset": [994, 1003]}, {"key": "federal-action", "type": "definition", "offset": [1012, 1026]}, {"key": "time-period", "type": "clause", "offset": [1032, 1043]}, {"key": "permit-duration", "type": "clause", "offset": [1072, 1087]}, {"key": "indirect-effects", "type": "clause", "offset": [1104, 1120]}, {"key": "proposed-action", "type": "definition", "offset": [1128, 1143]}, {"key": "other-elements", "type": "clause", "offset": [1201, 1215]}, {"key": "affected-environment", "type": "definition", "offset": [1223, 1243]}, {"key": "voluntary-measures", "type": "clause", "offset": [1403, 1421]}, {"key": "no-action-alternative", "type": "clause", "offset": [1508, 1529]}, {"key": "development-program", "type": "definition", "offset": [1628, 1647]}, {"key": "establishment-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [1656, 1672]}, {"key": "site-protection", "type": "clause", "offset": [1703, 1718]}, {"key": "management-provisions", "type": "clause", "offset": [1744, 1765]}, {"key": "the-development", "type": "clause", "offset": [1792, 1807]}, {"key": "wildlife-species", "type": "definition", "offset": [1927, 1943]}, {"key": "net-conservation-benefit", "type": "definition", "offset": [2015, 2039]}, {"key": "measurable-effects", "type": "definition", "offset": [2068, 2086]}, {"key": "the-actions", "type": "clause", "offset": [2147, 2158]}, {"key": "covered-lands", "type": "definition", "offset": [2197, 2210]}, {"key": "the-area", "type": "clause", "offset": [2368, 2376]}, {"key": "adjacent-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [2486, 2497]}, {"key": "for-example", "type": "clause", "offset": [2709, 2720]}, {"key": "federal-lands", "type": "definition", "offset": [2756, 2769]}, {"key": "private-lands", "type": "definition", "offset": [2804, 2817]}, {"key": "conservation-strategy", "type": "definition", "offset": [2868, 2889]}, {"key": "riparian-buffers", "type": "clause", "offset": [2890, 2906]}, {"key": "management-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [2952, 2965]}, {"key": "related-species", "type": "definition", "offset": [3019, 3034]}, {"key": "northern-spotted-owl", "type": "clause", "offset": [3059, 3079]}, {"key": "protection-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [3288, 3301]}, {"key": "being-conducted", "type": "definition", "offset": [3506, 3521]}, {"key": "the-land", "type": "clause", "offset": [3525, 3533]}, {"key": "analysis-area", "type": "definition", "offset": [3565, 3578]}, {"key": "frequency-and", "type": "definition", "offset": [3595, 3608]}, {"key": "natural-resources", "type": "definition", "offset": [3730, 3747]}, {"key": "timber-harvest-activities", "type": "definition", "offset": [4179, 4204]}, {"key": "availability-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [4206, 4221]}, {"key": "similar-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [4288, 4298]}, {"key": "current-condition", "type": "clause", "offset": [4303, 4320]}, {"key": "average-age", "type": "clause", "offset": [4649, 4660]}, {"key": "maintenance-and", "type": "clause", "offset": [4807, 4822]}, {"key": "development-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [4823, 4837]}, {"key": "state-lands", "type": "definition", "offset": [4897, 4908]}, {"key": "by-state", "type": "clause", "offset": [5078, 5086]}, {"key": "quality-and-quantity", "type": "clause", "offset": [5207, 5227]}], "snippet": "Cumulative impacts are defined under NEPA as \u201cthe impact[s] on the environment that results from the incremental impacts of the action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless of what agency (Federal or non-Federal) or person undertakes such actions\u201d (40 CFR 1508.7). Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant actions that take place over a period of time. The cumulative impacts of the various activities within the scope of this EA vary little between the two alternatives. The differences between the two alternatives are related to the amount of voluntary habitat enhancement and protection measures that will occur through the Applicants\u2019 forest management activities conducted according to Washington and Oregon Forest Practices Rules. This cumulative-impacts analysis focuses on the spotted owl conservation provisions and on forest management activities, because these are the focus of the SHA and the basis for the Federal action. The time period for analysis is the 60-year Permit duration. The direct and indirect effects of the Proposed Action Alternative on the spotted owl, spotted owl habitat, and other elements of the affected environment were described previously. To summarize, the Applicants\u2019 forest management activities would be conducted according to Forest Practices Rules complemented with voluntary measures that include 1) harvest rotations that are longer than the what would occur under the No Action Alternative, 2) commercial thinning to accelerate spotted owl habitat development, 3) a snag conservation and development program, 4) the establishment of SSAs, and 5) spotted owl nest site protection. These additional forest management provisions are expected to result in the development, retention, and/or enhancement of forest habitat with the potential for use by spotted owls, as well as other fish and wildlife species. The effects of the Applicants\u2019 activities are expected to result in a net conservation benefit to the spotted owl while no measurable effects on other elements of the affected environment are expected. The actions occurring in and near the Applicants\u2019 covered lands are expected, for the most part, to be limited to forest management activities. There are some agricultural and small home developments scattered throughout the area. For the foreseeable future, though, timber production will likely remain the dominant industry for the area adjacent to the covered lands. The effects of the forest management activities conducted by Federal, State, and private land managers and landowners are expected to be characteristically similar but would differ in degree. For example, sediment delivery to streams from Federal lands would probably be lower than from private lands as a result of the implementation of the Aquatics Conservation Strategy riparian buffers outlined in the Standards and Guidelines for Management of Habitat for Late- Successional and Old-growth Forest Related Species within the Range of the Northern Spotted Owl, i.e. Northwest Forest Plan Standards and Guidelines (USDA and USDI 1994). The aquatic conservation strategy requires wider riparian buffers than the Forest Practices Rules and would, thus, result in greater protection of streams. Forest management activities would differ between landowners with HCPs depending on their location, landscape condition, and species addressed. The difference in the forest management activities being conducted by the land managers and landowners in the analysis area would be in the frequency and level of timber harvest, and the amount of habitat retained, enhanced, and protected. The effects on the spotted owl and natural resources in and adjacent to the covered lands would be reflective of the different forest management activities implemented by the various land managers and landowners, primarily WDNR through implementation of their HCP (WDNR 1997) and the USFS through implementation of the Northwest Forest Plan (USDI 1994). Forested habitats in early seral stages for terrestrial species would be provided throughout the landscape in adequate amounts by timber harvest activities. Availability of this forested habitat in early seral stages is expected to remain similar to the current condition as private landowners manage their ownership under Forest Practices Rules and on a 40- to 45-year rotation. There is, and will continue to be, limited late successional forest on private lands in the area. Riparian zones may eventually provide late successional forest permeating the landscape. Although stands would grow to an average age of 60 years under the Proposed Action Alternative, these stands are not expected to function like an old-growth forest would for the spotted owl. Maintenance and development of older forest habitat would primarily occur on the adjacent state lands under the WDNR HCP and USFS lands as they are managed under the Northwest Forest Plan. The cumulative impacts of the Proposed Action Alternative and anticipated actions by State and private land managers and landowners, as well as the USFS, is expected to result in overall improvements in habitat quality and quantity for spotted owls. Managing for spotted owl dispersal habitat and YFM habitat is expected to facilitate dispersal and demographic functions, especially within the White Salmon SOSEA.", "hash": "aa3c65b9f4b7db85297e9fd57f85ee23", "id": 4}, {"samples": [{"hash": "luQ1wYaP8oS", "uri": "/contracts/luQ1wYaP8oS#cumulative-impacts", "label": "Offshore Ornithology Consultation Agreement Log", "score": 33.6171302795, "published": true}, {"hash": "5KMmXqeuD5K", "uri": "/contracts/5KMmXqeuD5K#cumulative-impacts", "label": "Offshore Ornithology Consultation Agreement Log", "score": 33.592212677, "published": true}], "size": 2, "snippet_links": [{"key": "table-2", "type": "definition", "offset": [0, 7]}, {"key": "relating-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [50, 61]}, {"key": "the-applicant", "type": "definition", "offset": [100, 113]}], "snippet": "Table 2-7: Summary of key consultation agreements relating to cumulative impacts. ID Issue on which the Applicant Sought Agreement The Applicant Comments Consultee Comments Agreed, Disagreed and/or Actions\n1. CEF Tool", "hash": "33f0ab2292f39d4a4735311fd9c8ac46", "id": 5}, {"samples": [{"hash": "cNvRr4ktgE5", "uri": "/contracts/cNvRr4ktgE5#cumulative-impacts", "label": "General Lease   Public Agency Use", "score": 17.0, "published": true}], "size": 1, "snippet_links": [{"key": "final-eir", "type": "definition", "offset": [4, 13]}, {"key": "environmental-impacts", "type": "clause", "offset": [128, 149]}, {"key": "development-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [166, 180]}, {"key": "future-projects", "type": "definition", "offset": [264, 279]}, {"key": "to-the-extent", "type": "clause", "offset": [366, 379]}, {"key": "the-project", "type": "clause", "offset": [391, 402]}, {"key": "the-cumulative", "type": "clause", "offset": [460, 474]}, {"key": "by-the-regents", "type": "clause", "offset": [644, 658]}, {"key": "in-connection-with", "type": "clause", "offset": [659, 677]}, {"key": "approval-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [682, 693]}], "snippet": "The Final EIR identified no new cumulative impacts other than those identified in the LRDP EIR. The LRDP EIR fully analyzed the environmental impacts from cumulative development of proposed LRDP projects and other related past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the surrounding community, and that discussion is incorporated into these Findings to the extent pertinent. The Project would incrementally contribute to, but would not exceed, the cumulative impacts previously identified in 115 the LRDP EIR. Cumulative campus development impacts have been fully addressed by the Findings and Overriding Considerations adopted by The Regents in connection with its approval of the LRDP.", "hash": "553566d1a55f0d9e2dd32c7d937f2f13", "id": 6}, {"samples": [{"hash": "cNvRr4ktgE5", "uri": "/contracts/cNvRr4ktgE5#cumulative-impacts", "label": "General Lease   Public Agency Use", "score": 17.0, "published": true}], "size": 1, "snippet_links": [{"key": "draft-eir", "type": "definition", "offset": [4, 13]}, {"key": "february-1997", "type": "clause", "offset": [47, 60]}, {"key": "review-and-comment", "type": "clause", "offset": [84, 102]}, {"key": "other-interested-parties", "type": "clause", "offset": [121, 145]}, {"key": "day-period", "type": "definition", "offset": [184, 194]}, {"key": "on-march", "type": "clause", "offset": [210, 218]}, {"key": "in-addition", "type": "clause", "offset": [229, 240]}, {"key": "public-hearing", "type": "clause", "offset": [244, 258]}, {"key": "public-testimony", "type": "definition", "offset": [286, 302]}, {"key": "environmental-effects", "type": "clause", "offset": [393, 414]}, {"key": "received-by", "type": "definition", "offset": [420, 431]}, {"key": "public-comments", "type": "clause", "offset": [522, 537]}, {"key": "contained-in", "type": "definition", "offset": [542, 554]}, {"key": "final-eir", "type": "definition", "offset": [559, 568]}, {"key": "disposition-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [616, 630]}, {"key": "project-eir", "type": "definition", "offset": [831, 842]}, {"key": "project-elements", "type": "definition", "offset": [1046, 1062]}, {"key": "specific-mitigation-measures", "type": "clause", "offset": [1089, 1117]}, {"key": "the-approval", "type": "clause", "offset": [1164, 1176]}, {"key": "conditions-of-the-project", "type": "clause", "offset": [1190, 1215]}, {"key": "environmental-impacts", "type": "clause", "offset": [1284, 1305]}], "snippet": "The Draft EIR for the Project was completed in February 1997 and was circulated for review and comment by the public and other interested parties, agencies, and organizations for a 45-day period that concluded on March 31, 1997. In addition, a public hearing on the Draft EIR to accept public testimony was held on March 18, 1997, on the campus. Two letters concerning potentially significant environmental effects were received by the campus. No comments were received at the public hearing. The campus' responses to the public comments are contained in the Final EIR. 110 MINUTE PAGE 002753 B. Project_Impacts and Disposition of Related Mitigation Measures Identified in the EIB. The analysis in the Project Final EIR is focused to address those impacts of the Project not adequately identified or mitigated by the LRDP EIR. The Project EIR also identifies LRDP EIR mitigation measures relevant to the Project that must be implemented as part of the Project. All relevant LRDP EIR mitigation measures have been incorporated into the Project as Project elements. In addition, all Project-specific mitigation measures identified in the Project EIR are included in the Approval and are made conditions of the Project. The following discussion elaborates on potentially significant new environmental impacts identified in the Project EIR and new mitigation measures proposed in the Project EIR.", "hash": "a621f9340f7c83afcc5be1ae28d4f4d0", "id": 7}, {"samples": [{"hash": "dfwTfxdwD6l", "uri": "/contracts/dfwTfxdwD6l#cumulative-impacts", "label": "Development Agreement", "score": 23.3750858307, "published": true}], "size": 1, "snippet_links": [{"key": "item-1", "type": "clause", "offset": [5, 11]}, {"key": "approved-projects", "type": "definition", "offset": [24, 41]}, {"key": "over-time", "type": "clause", "offset": [97, 106]}, {"key": "item-2", "type": "definition", "offset": [119, 125]}, {"key": "energy-conservation-program", "type": "clause", "offset": [256, 283]}, {"key": "waste-reduction", "type": "definition", "offset": [308, 323]}, {"key": "significant-impact", "type": "definition", "offset": [413, 431]}, {"key": "emergency-responders", "type": "definition", "offset": [447, 467]}, {"key": "power-and-water", "type": "clause", "offset": [587, 602]}, {"key": "safety-program", "type": "definition", "offset": [643, 657]}, {"key": "exhibit-b", "type": "definition", "offset": [703, 712]}], "snippet": "H-23/Item 1 \u201cThe 25 new approved projects in the West Berkeley area will demand increased energy over time.\u201d 5M-5 H-23/Item 2 \u201cThe 25 approved projects in West Berkeley will generate an increase in waste by an unknown amount.\u201d 5M-5 Bayer will implement an Energy Conservation Program. Bayer will implement a Waste Reduction Program. H-23/Item 1 \u201cThere is potential for damage to structures from ground shaking. A significant impact to workers and emergency responders would be present from falling and moving objects, ground shaking during aftershocks, spilled materials, and/or loss of power and water.\u201d 4.3-20 Bayer will implement a Seismic Safety Program for new structures and structures to remain. Exhibit B", "hash": "d784a0d56bbeccd9543689c36b2399d6", "id": 8}, {"samples": [{"hash": "dr23vu4P2Uh", "uri": "/contracts/dr23vu4P2Uh#cumulative-impacts", "label": "Airport Planning Services Agreement", "score": 21.164270401, "published": true}], "size": 1, "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-consultant-will", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 19]}, {"key": "proposed-action", "type": "definition", "offset": [61, 76]}, {"key": "reasonably-foreseeable", "type": "clause", "offset": [137, 159]}], "snippet": "The Consultant will: Analyze impacts on resources due to the proposed action and impacts on the same resources due to past, present, and reasonably foreseeable actions. If there are no cumulative impacts, that fact will be so stated.", "hash": "503d0e53a55ad653d81d0a70d8a87ebe", "id": 9}, {"samples": [{"hash": "8h9KFptrdo0", "uri": "/contracts/8h9KFptrdo0#cumulative-impacts", "label": "Funding Agreement", "score": 32.1373710632, "published": true}], "size": 1, "snippet_links": [{"key": "in-accordance-with", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 18]}, {"key": "development-of-the-project", "type": "clause", "offset": [121, 147]}, {"key": "future-projects", "type": "definition", "offset": [204, 219]}, {"key": "based-on", "type": "definition", "offset": [278, 286]}, {"key": "a-list", "type": "definition", "offset": [287, 293]}, {"key": "the-area", "type": "clause", "offset": [333, 341]}, {"key": "by-the-county", "type": "clause", "offset": [367, 380]}, {"key": "docusign-envelope", "type": "definition", "offset": [382, 399]}], "snippet": "In accordance with CEQA requirements, the SEIR would analyze potentially significant cumulative impacts anticipated from development of the project combined with past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the County and project vicinity. The analysis would be based on a list of proposed or anticipated projects in the area, which would be provided by the County. DocuSign Envelope ID: 8A8FA6D9-6F98-4F64-AB10-1581B1208F67 DocuSign Envelope ID: 73576F7C-5408-42D9-A90C-958B8405D68C", "hash": "7b8b80c429e05f121a270de58aeacfa5", "id": 10}], "next_curs": "ClsSVWoVc35sYXdpbnNpZGVyY29udHJhY3RzcjcLEhZDbGF1c2VTbmlwcGV0R3JvdXBfdjU2IhtjdW11bGF0aXZlLWltcGFjdHMjMDAwMDAwMGEMogECZW4YACAA", "clause": {"parents": [["scope-of-services", "SCOPE OF SERVICES"], ["restoration-restoration-plan-preparation", "Restoration\n\nRestoration Plan Preparation"], ["consent-to-use-of-electronic-signatures", "CONSENT TO USE OF ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES"], ["form-delivery-by-e-mail-or-facsimile", "Form: Delivery by E-Mail or Facsimile"], ["time-requirements-for-permits", "Time Requirements for Permits"]], "title": "Cumulative Impacts", "children": [["cumulative-approach", "Cumulative Approach"], ["initial-public-scoping", "Initial Public Scoping"], ["summary-of-public-participation", "SUMMARY OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION"], ["draft-ea-public-comment", "Draft EA Public Comment"], ["rationale-for-plan-preference", "Rationale for Plan Preference"]], "size": 53, "id": "cumulative-impacts", "related": [["increased-costs-and-reduced-return", "Increased Costs and Reduced Return", "Increased Costs and Reduced Return"], ["severability-maximum-payment-amounts", "Severability; Maximum Payment Amounts", "Severability; Maximum Payment Amounts"], ["excess-costs", "Excess Costs", "Excess Costs"], ["right-of-allottee-to-use-common-areas-and-facilities-subject-to-payment-of-total-maintenance-charges", "RIGHT OF ALLOTTEE TO USE COMMON AREAS AND FACILITIES SUBJECT TO PAYMENT OF TOTAL MAINTENANCE CHARGES", "RIGHT OF ALLOTTEE TO USE COMMON AREAS AND FACILITIES SUBJECT TO PAYMENT OF TOTAL MAINTENANCE CHARGES"], ["increased-cost-and-reduced-return-capital-adequacy", "Increased Cost and Reduced Return; Capital Adequacy", "Increased Cost and Reduced Return; Capital Adequacy"]], "related_snippets": [], "updated": "2025-07-24T06:49:03+00:00", "also_ask": [], "drafting_tip": null, "explanation": "The Cumulative Impacts clause defines how multiple changes, delays, or disruptions to a project are considered collectively rather than individually. In practice, this clause addresses situations where the combined effect of several minor events may have a greater impact on the project than each event would in isolation, such as multiple small delays that together cause significant schedule overruns. Its core function is to ensure that the overall impact of numerous events is recognized and addressed, preventing parties from dismissing the compounded effects of repeated or concurrent issues."}, "json": true, "cursor": ""}}