Criminal Jurisdiction. The competent authorities of a Sending State shall have the right to exercise on the territory of the Host State all the criminal jurisdiction and disciplinary powers conferred on them by the law of the Sending State with regard to all EUFOR personnel subject to the relevant law of the Sending State.
Criminal Jurisdiction. A national or permanent resident of Australia or Timor-Leste shall be subject to the criminal law of that country in respect of acts or omissions occurring in the Special Regime Area connected with or arising out of Petroleum Activities, provided that a permanent resident of Australia or Timor-Leste who is a national of the other country shall be subject to the criminal law of that country. Subject to paragraph 4 of this Article, a national of a third State, not being a national or permanent resident of either Australia or Timor-Leste, shall be subject to the criminal law of both Australia and TimorLeste in respect of acts or omissions occurring in the Special Regime Area connected with or arising out of Petroleum Activities. Such a person shall not be subject to criminal proceedings under the law of either Australia or Timor-Leste if he or she has already been tried and discharged or acquitted by a competent tribunal or already undergone punishment for the same act or omission under the law of the other country or where the competent authorities of one country, in accordance with its law, have decided in the public interest to refrain from prosecuting the person for that act or omission. In cases referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article, Australia and Timor-Leste shall, as and when necessary, consult each other to determine which criminal law is to be applied, taking into account the nationality of the victim and the interests of the country most affected by the alleged offence. The criminal law of the flag State shall apply in relation to acts or omissions on board vessels, including seismic or drill vessels in, or aircraft in flight over, the Special Regime Area. Australia and Timor-Leste shall provide assistance to and co-operate with each other, including through agreements or arrangements as appropriate, for the purposes of enforcement of criminal law under this Article, including the obtaining of evidence and information. Both Australia and Timor-Leste recognise the interest of the other country where a victim of an alleged offence is a national of that other country and shall keep that other country informed to the extent permitted by its law, of action being taken with regard to the alleged offence. Australia and Timor-Leste may make arrangements permitting officials of one country to assist in the enforcement of the criminal law of the other country. Where such assistance involves the detention of a person who under paragraph 1 of this Article ...
Criminal Jurisdiction. 1. Subject to paragraph 3 of this Article a national or permanent resident of a Contracting State shall be subject to the criminal law of that State in respect of acts or omissions occurring in Area A connected with or arising out of exploration for and exploitation of petroleum resources, provided that a permanent resident of a Contracting State who is a national of the other Contracting State shall be subject to the criminal law of the latter State.
(a) Subject to paragraph 3 of this Article, a national of a third State, not being a permanent resident of either Contracting State, shall be subject to the criminal law of both Contracting States in respect of acts or omissions occurring in Area A connected with or arising out of the exploration for and exploitation of petroleum resources. Such a person shall not be subject to criminal proceedings under the law of one Contracting State if he or she has already been tried and discharged or acquitted by a competent tribunal or already undergone punishment for the same act or omission under the law of the other Contracting State or where the competent authorities of one Contracting State, in accordance with its law, have decided in the public interest to refrain from prosecuting the person for that act or omission.
(b) In cases referred to in sub-paragraph (a) of this paragraph, the Contracting States shall, as and when necessary, consult each other to determine which criminal law is to be applied, taking into account the nationality of the victim and the interests of the Contracting State most affected by the alleged offence.
3. The criminal law of the flag State shall apply in relation to acts or omissions on board vessels including seismic or drill vessels in, or aircraft in flight over, Area A.
(a) The Contracting States shall provide assistance to and cooperate with each other, including through agreements or arrangements as appropriate, for the purposes of enforcement of criminal law under this Article, including the obtaining of evidence and information.
(b) Each Contracting State recognizes the interest of the other Contracting State where a victim of an alleged offence is a national of that other State and shall keep that other State informed to the extent permitted by its law of action being taken with regard to the alleged offence.
5. The Contracting States may make arrangements permitting officials of one Contracting State to assist in the enforcement of the criminal law of the other Contracting Sta...
Criminal Jurisdiction. Presently, the Federal government has law enforcement jurisdiction within the Nations’ treaty territories. With respect to criminal matters, the legislation should:
a. Affirm the Five Tribes’ criminal jurisdiction throughout their respective treaty territories over Indian offenders, as well as those non-Indian offenders over which federally-recognized tribes generally have jurisdiction in Indian country, such as domestic abusers covered by the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013;
b. Provide and affirm the State’s criminal jurisdiction over all offenders throughout that same area, including appropriate and legal mechanisms to address matters concerning existing convictions, with the exception of crimes involving Indians committed on Indian trust or restricted lands; and
c. Authorize and direct the U.S. Department of Justice to coordinate with the State and Nations concerning deployment of law enforcement resources and respective authorities under the law.
Criminal Jurisdiction. The criminal jurisdiction of the Council covers all offenses committed by Palestinians and/or non-Israelis in the Territory, subject to the provisions of this Article.
Criminal Jurisdiction. 1. Subject to the provisions of this Article:
(a) United States personnel are subject to the criminal jurisdiction of the Government of Palau for offenses committed by such personnel in Palau.
(b) The Government of the United States has the right to exercise within Palau criminal and disciplinary jurisdiction over United States personnel for offenses punishable under the laws of the United States. In lieu of criminal or disciplinary proceedings in Palau, the Government of the United States may elect to remove United States personnel for such proceedings elsewhere.
(c) For purposes of asserting jurisdiction under this Article, the determination of a Signatory Government as to whether an offense is punishable under its laws shall be conclusive.
2. The Government of Palau has the right to exercise exclusive jurisdiction over United States personnel with respect to offenses committed in Palau, which are punishable under local law, but not under the laws of the United States applicable to offenses committed outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.
3. The Government of the United States has the right to exercise exclusive jurisdiction over United States personnel with respect to offenses committed in Palau which are punishable under the laws of the United States applicable to offenses committed outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, but not under local law.
4. The Government of Palau and the Government of the United States have concurrent jurisdiction over United States personnel with respect to offenses committed in Palau, which are punishable under both local laws and the laws of the United States applicable to offenses committed outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States. Whenever it is determined by the Government of Palau that an act or omission is a punishable offense under the laws of Palau, and it is determined by the Government of the United States that the same act or omission is a punishable offense under the laws of the United states applicable to offenses committed outside the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, the following rules shall apply:
(a) The Government of Palau, has the primary right to exercise jurisdiction over United States personnel in all other cases of concurrent jurisdiction, except as provided in paragraph 4(b) of this Article.
(b) The Government of the United States has the primary right to exercise jurisdiction over United States personnel in Palau, for:
(1) Offense...
Criminal Jurisdiction. 6.1 Subject to Article 3.9, the law enforcement agency of the host State shall be responsible for maintaining peace, security, law and order and dealing with non border controls related criminal offences in the control zone. With respect to border controls related criminal offences, the law enforcement agencies of the Parties shall have jurisdiction to assist border controls agencies in effecting their controls in terms of the provisions of their national laws, Nothing in this Article shall prevent law enforcement agencies of the Parties from carrying out independent border control activities in the control zone as mandated by their national laws.
6.2 Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted as restricting the jurisdiction of the host State to maintain law and order and to prosecute under its laws such offences committed within its territory.
6.3 Notwithstanding Article 5.4, a law enforcement Officer of the adjoining State may in the control zone in the host State, arrest a person exiting the host State—
(a) provided such arrest is authorized by a warrant issued by a court in the adjoining State; or
(b) the name and description or both, together with particulars of an arrestable offence of which there are reasonable grounds for suspecting such person to have committed an offence, have been made available by the competent authorities of the adjoining State to the competent authorities of the host State.
6.4 The law enforcement agencies of the host State shall, upon request, assist those of the adjoining State in effecting their mandated controls in the control zone including without limitation, the provision of secure holding cells and related facilities.
6.5 The Parties may, as necessitated by circumstances, agree to parameters for carrying out security related joint border control patrols in each other’s territory involving border control Officers and consistent with the principles contained in this Agreement to facilitate the fight against cross-border crime. Such parameters to be agreed on and described in a Schedule which shall be annexed hereto and shall inter alia, include a clear and precise definition of the extent of each other’s territory to be covered by such joint patrols, jurisdiction and powers of the Officers involved in such joint patrols, provisions relating to the carrying and use of arms by the Officers during such joint patrols, and command and control structures of such joint patrols.
Criminal Jurisdiction. As a matter of federal law, Public Law 280, most state criminal laws continue to apply on Indian trust lands and the County’s Sheriff’s Office retains jurisdiction over the enforcement of those laws. The County’s Sheriff’s Office shall have authority to enforce all applicable state criminal laws on the Property, in the same manner and to the same extent as the County Sheriff’s Office has such jurisdiction elsewhere in the County. The Tribe and County hereby agree to develop a protocol prior to opening of the new gaming Facility regarding notification to the Tribe by the County Sheriff’s Office regarding entry to the property for non-emergency investigation and/or enforcement of state criminal law.
Criminal Jurisdiction. Pg. 12-1 to 12-5
Criminal Jurisdiction. The Agreements will not change the allocation of criminal jurisdiction as between the State, Federal, and Pueblo authorities.
