{"component": "clause", "props": {"groups": [{"samples": [{"hash": "3S5PaSX43Ms", "uri": "/contracts/3S5PaSX43Ms#cost-allocation-methodology", "label": "Partner Infrastructure Funding Agreement", "score": 22.8151950836, "published": true}, {"hash": "8cRCFDX2tBV", "uri": "/contracts/8cRCFDX2tBV#cost-allocation-methodology", "label": "Partner Infrastructure Funding Agreement (Ifa)", "score": 22.2594108582, "published": true}], "snippet_links": [{"key": "career-center", "type": "definition", "offset": [100, 113]}, {"key": "funding-mechanism", "type": "clause", "offset": [139, 156]}, {"key": "temporary-assistance-for-needy-families", "type": "definition", "offset": [168, 207]}, {"key": "community-services-block-grant", "type": "definition", "offset": [216, 246]}, {"key": "percentage-cap", "type": "definition", "offset": [342, 356]}, {"key": "the-agency", "type": "clause", "offset": [378, 388]}, {"key": "proportionate-share", "type": "definition", "offset": [391, 410]}, {"key": "additional-costs", "type": "definition", "offset": [433, 449]}, {"key": "based-on", "type": "definition", "offset": [500, 508]}, {"key": "service-criteria", "type": "clause", "offset": [519, 535]}, {"key": "title-iv", "type": "clause", "offset": [561, 569]}, {"key": "vocational-rehabilitation", "type": "definition", "offset": [571, 596]}, {"key": "career-and-technical-education", "type": "definition", "offset": [622, 652]}, {"key": "adult-education-and-family-literacy-act", "type": "definition", "offset": [663, 702]}, {"key": "number-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [747, 756]}, {"key": "services-in-the", "type": "clause", "offset": [802, 817]}, {"key": "program-year", "type": "definition", "offset": [827, 839]}, {"key": "to-negotiate", "type": "definition", "offset": [884, 896]}, {"key": "allocated-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [963, 975]}, {"key": "workforce-board", "type": "definition", "offset": [982, 997]}, {"key": "workforce-solutions", "type": "definition", "offset": [1082, 1101]}, {"key": "workforce-development-board", "type": "clause", "offset": [1133, 1160]}, {"key": "required-partners", "type": "definition", "offset": [1204, 1221]}, {"key": "state-agencies", "type": "definition", "offset": [1227, 1241]}, {"key": "lump-sum", "type": "definition", "offset": [1304, 1312]}, {"key": "state-agency", "type": "clause", "offset": [1386, 1398]}, {"key": "local-area", "type": "clause", "offset": [1435, 1445]}, {"key": "funding-methodology", "type": "definition", "offset": [1454, 1473]}, {"key": "federally-funded", "type": "clause", "offset": [1595, 1611]}, {"key": "infrastructure-cost", "type": "definition", "offset": [1829, 1848]}, {"key": "not-required", "type": "definition", "offset": [1860, 1872]}, {"key": "partner-programs", "type": "clause", "offset": [1887, 1903]}, {"key": "title-iii", "type": "definition", "offset": [1929, 1938]}, {"key": "employment-services", "type": "definition", "offset": [1953, 1972]}, {"key": "state-grants", "type": "definition", "offset": [2031, 2043]}, {"key": "cost-sharing-model", "type": "clause", "offset": [2056, 2074]}, {"key": "grant-employees", "type": "clause", "offset": [2091, 2106]}, {"key": "the-center", "type": "definition", "offset": [2207, 2217]}, {"key": "employee-will", "type": "clause", "offset": [2232, 2245]}, {"key": "the-total", "type": "clause", "offset": [2258, 2267]}, {"key": "cost-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [2283, 2290]}, {"key": "where-applicable", "type": "clause", "offset": [2318, 2334]}, {"key": "not-applicable", "type": "definition", "offset": [2390, 2404]}, {"key": "dislocated-worker", "type": "definition", "offset": [2445, 2462]}, {"key": "job-corps", "type": "definition", "offset": [2543, 2552]}, {"key": "local-negotiations", "type": "clause", "offset": [2553, 2571]}, {"key": "native-american", "type": "definition", "offset": [2643, 2658]}, {"key": "jobs-program", "type": "definition", "offset": [2721, 2733]}, {"key": "senior-community-service-employment-program", "type": "clause", "offset": [3016, 3059]}, {"key": "the-division", "type": "clause", "offset": [3116, 3128]}, {"key": "federal-funding", "type": "definition", "offset": [3153, 3168]}, {"key": "local-workforce", "type": "definition", "offset": [3172, 3187]}, {"key": "covered-by", "type": "definition", "offset": [3223, 3233]}, {"key": "adult-services", "type": "definition", "offset": [3287, 3301]}, {"key": "of-employment", "type": "clause", "offset": [3331, 3344]}, {"key": "the-award", "type": "clause", "offset": [3375, 3384]}, {"key": "unemployment-compensation", "type": "definition", "offset": [3386, 3411]}, {"key": "employment-opportunities", "type": "clause", "offset": [3477, 3501]}, {"key": "second-chance", "type": "definition", "offset": [3518, 3531]}, {"key": "act-of-2007", "type": "definition", "offset": [3532, 3543]}, {"key": "calculated-amount", "type": "definition", "offset": [3643, 3660]}, {"key": "service-area", "type": "definition", "offset": [3807, 3819]}], "snippet": "There is a two-tiered approach for determining infrastructure and additional cost for required WIOA Career Center partners using the Local Funding Mechanism (LFM). For Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) and Senior Community Service Employment (SCSEP) programs, the LFM method uses a funding percentage cap of 1.5% to determine the agency\u2019s proportionate share of infrastructure and additional costs. The 1.5% is then distributed to workforce boards based on workforce service criteria outlined by each agency. Title IV, Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) and \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 \u2587. \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 Career and Technical Education, Title II Adult Education and Family Literacy Act (AEFLA) proportionate share is based on the number of VR and adult education clients that received services in the previous program year and documented in NC Works. The LFM is used to negotiate appropriate contributions from each required partner that will be allocated to the - workforce board as outlined below. The two-tiered approach methodology does not include Division of Workforce Solutions (DWS) administered programs or Workforce Development Board (WDB) administered programs. For all other required partners with state agencies, infrastructure contributions will be transferred to DWS as a lump sum based on the LFM for the said agency. Once DWS receives funding from the State agency, DWS will distribute funding to the local area via the funding methodology set up for each State agency as outlined in the table below. For required partners without a State agency, but which are federally funded, the LFM is used as well; however, this negotiation will vary per WDB and should be outlined in the table below. Not all federally funded required partners may administer programs in a WDB\u2019s Local Area. In that case, infrastructure cost sharing is not required. For required partner programs administered by the DWS: Title III \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587-\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 Employment Services, Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA), and Jobs for Veterans State Grants (JVSG), the cost sharing model is based on the grant employees\u2019 proportionate use of the NCWorks Career Center. DWS and WDB will pay a cost per employee housed in the center. The cost per employee will be based on the total infrastructure cost of the NCWorks Career Center, where applicable. (Please do not delete any partners from the table. If not applicable, please write N/A) WIOA Title I: Adult, Dislocated Worker, and Youth formula programs Proportionate use \u2013 cost per employee WIOA Title I: Job Corps Local negotiations or N/A WIOA Title I: YouthBuild Local negotiation or N/A WIOA Title I: Native American programs Local negotiation or N/A WIOA I: National Farmworker Jobs Program (NFJP) Local negotiation or N/A WIOA Title III: \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587-\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 Act Employment Service (ES) program Proportionate use \u2013 cost per employee WIOA Title III: Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) activities Proportionate use \u2013 cost per employee Jobs for Veterans State Grants (JVSG) programs Senior Community Service Employment program (SCSEP) Local negotiations or NA or State-run programs :The Division distributes 1.5% of the federal funding to local workforce boards that support those counties covered by the SCSEP grant awarded to NC DHHS-Div. of Aging and Adult Services proportionally to the number of employment slots that county received in the award. Unemployment Compensation (UC) programs Based on Title I Dislocated Worker formula Reentry Employment Opportunities (REO) programs (Second Chance Act of 2007) Local negotiation or N/A WIOA Title II: Adult Education and Family Literacy Act (AEFLA) program A calculated amount per participant served is allocated based upon the number of AEFLA participants receiving staff assisted services at a WDB within each provider\u2019s service area.", "size": 8, "hash": "c2582c6683818d6c940b4712bcc04710", "id": 1}, {"samples": [{"hash": "5i7E0CY99Jx", "uri": "/contracts/5i7E0CY99Jx#cost-allocation-methodology", "label": "Memorandum of Understanding", "score": 29.5388660431, "published": true}, {"hash": "g0QCnHGlduw", "uri": "/contracts/g0QCnHGlduw#cost-allocation-methodology", "label": "Memorandum of Understanding", "score": 29.4622192383, "published": true}, {"hash": "73Uvmbwt8mB", "uri": "/contracts/73Uvmbwt8mB#cost-allocation-methodology", "label": "Memorandum of Understanding", "score": 29.4622192383, "published": true}], "snippet_links": [{"key": "the-parties-agree-that", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 22]}, {"key": "cost-allocation-formula", "type": "definition", "offset": [27, 50]}, {"key": "based-on", "type": "definition", "offset": [59, 67]}, {"key": "by-partner", "type": "clause", "offset": [97, 107]}, {"key": "job-center", "type": "definition", "offset": [124, 134]}, {"key": "the-funds", "type": "clause", "offset": [176, 185]}, {"key": "resource-rooms", "type": "clause", "offset": [210, 224]}, {"key": "costs-of-lease", "type": "clause", "offset": [254, 268]}, {"key": "facility-maintenance", "type": "definition", "offset": [270, 290]}, {"key": "property-and-casualty-insurance", "type": "definition", "offset": [292, 323]}, {"key": "cleaning-services", "type": "clause", "offset": [325, 342]}, {"key": "and-equipment", "type": "clause", "offset": [355, 368]}], "snippet": "The parties agree that the cost allocation formula will be based on customers served as reported by PARTNER in the American Job Center (AJC) location(s) identified in the MOU. The funds contributed support the resource rooms in the AJC, and comprise the costs of lease, facility maintenance, property and casualty insurance, cleaning services, utilities, and equipment.", "size": 7, "hash": "aab7304a691e8a99af83a895114c21e2", "id": 2}, {"samples": [{"hash": "e2IuIHaK3zp", "uri": "/contracts/e2IuIHaK3zp#cost-allocation-methodology", "label": "Memorandum of Understanding", "score": 23.262834549, "published": true}], "snippet_links": [{"key": "board-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [26, 34]}, {"key": "this-mou", "type": "definition", "offset": [75, 83]}, {"key": "agree-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [84, 92]}, {"key": "methodology-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [111, 125]}, {"key": "proportionate-share", "type": "definition", "offset": [139, 158]}, {"key": "infrastructure-costs", "type": "definition", "offset": [162, 182]}, {"key": "consistent-with", "type": "definition", "offset": [290, 305]}, {"key": "federal-laws", "type": "definition", "offset": [306, 318]}, {"key": "federal-cost-principles", "type": "clause", "offset": [369, 392]}, {"key": "uniform-guidance", "type": "clause", "offset": [400, 416]}, {"key": "program-partner", "type": "definition", "offset": [503, 518]}, {"key": "based-on", "type": "definition", "offset": [527, 535]}, {"key": "received-by", "type": "definition", "offset": [624, 635]}, {"key": "partner-program", "type": "definition", "offset": [729, 744]}, {"key": "occupancy-percentage", "type": "definition", "offset": [747, 767]}, {"key": "square-footage", "type": "definition", "offset": [771, 785]}, {"key": "at-the-\u2587", "type": "clause", "offset": [804, 812]}, {"key": "job-center", "type": "definition", "offset": [840, 850]}, {"key": "docusign-envelope", "type": "definition", "offset": [894, 911]}], "snippet": "The Workforce Development Board of \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 County and colocated Partners to this MOU agree to a cost allocation methodology to identify the proportionate share of infrastructure costs each partner will be expected to contribute. This cost allocation methodology adheres to the following: is consistent with federal laws authorizing each partner\u2019s program; complies with federal cost principles in the Uniform Guidance; includes only costs that are allowable, reasonable, necessary, and allocable to each program Partner; and is based on an agreed upon measure that mathematically determines the proportionate use and benefit received by each Partner. The infrastructure cost allocation methodology selected is the proportion of a Partner program\u2019s occupancy percentage in square footage and time utilized at the \u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587\u2587 Employment Connection Job Center in Vallejo, the AJCC comprehensive center. DocuSign Envelope ID: EE6FCF81-74ED-4FEF-9E5F-33A59C3F9E03", "size": 7, "hash": "018f5695961655f473f4401638cbb9ab", "id": 3}, {"samples": [{"hash": "lJSZHryQO6V", "uri": "/contracts/lJSZHryQO6V#cost-allocation-methodology", "label": "Service Agreement (Firstenergy Corp)", "score": 18.0, "published": true}, {"hash": "cfWqmgMoFw9", "uri": "/contracts/cfWqmgMoFw9#cost-allocation-methodology", "label": "Service Agreement (Firstenergy Corp)", "score": 18.0, "published": true}, {"hash": "aeVNBCO4Ze", "uri": "/contracts/aeVNBCO4Ze#cost-allocation-methodology", "label": "Service Agreement (Firstenergy Corp)", "score": 18.0, "published": true}], "snippet_links": [{"key": "company-will", "type": "clause", "offset": [51, 63]}, {"key": "work-order", "type": "definition", "offset": [142, 152]}, {"key": "basis-for-charges", "type": "clause", "offset": [193, 210]}, {"key": "to-affiliates", "type": "clause", "offset": [211, 224]}, {"key": "direct-charge-method", "type": "definition", "offset": [232, 252]}, {"key": "listed-below", "type": "clause", "offset": [272, 284]}, {"key": "other-costs", "type": "definition", "offset": [300, 311]}, {"key": "cost-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [382, 389]}, {"key": "product-or-service", "type": "clause", "offset": [404, 422]}, {"key": "product-and-services", "type": "definition", "offset": [437, 457]}, {"key": "the-subsidiary", "type": "clause", "offset": [517, 531]}, {"key": "associate-companies", "type": "definition", "offset": [593, 612]}, {"key": "method-of", "type": "clause", "offset": [709, 718]}, {"key": "cost-allocation", "type": "definition", "offset": [719, 734]}, {"key": "based-on", "type": "definition", "offset": [742, 750]}, {"key": "the-department", "type": "clause", "offset": [751, 765]}, {"key": "the-service", "type": "definition", "offset": [776, 787]}, {"key": "allocation-methods", "type": "clause", "offset": [793, 811]}], "snippet": "Overview The costs of services provided by Service Company will be directly assigned, distributed or allocated by activity, project, program, work order or other appropriate basis. The primary basis for charges to affiliates is the direct charge method. The methodologies listed below pertain to all other costs which are not directly assigned but which make up the fully allocated cost of providing the product or service. The costs of product and services provided by the ServeCo that cannot be charged directly to the Subsidiary receiving the product or service will be allocated among the associate companies by utilizing one of the methods described below that most accurately distributes the costs. The method of cost allocation varies based on the department rendering the service. The allocation methods used by Service Company are as follows:", "size": 4, "hash": "1203c037bac7c036876dbf0eaf55658a", "id": 4}, {"samples": [{"hash": "4QgV7UfBseb", "uri": "/contracts/4QgV7UfBseb#cost-allocation-methodology", "label": "Service Level Agreement", "score": 28.2670040131, "published": true}], "snippet_links": [{"key": "county-clerk", "type": "definition", "offset": [87, 99]}, {"key": "personnel-changes", "type": "clause", "offset": [115, 132]}, {"key": "wage-increases", "type": "definition", "offset": [167, 181]}, {"key": "personnel-costs", "type": "clause", "offset": [183, 198]}, {"key": "per-year", "type": "definition", "offset": [236, 244]}, {"key": "allocation-matrix", "type": "definition", "offset": [292, 309]}, {"key": "and-development", "type": "clause", "offset": [334, 349]}, {"key": "costs-of", "type": "definition", "offset": [370, 378]}, {"key": "software-developers", "type": "clause", "offset": [408, 427]}, {"key": "county-sheriff", "type": "definition", "offset": [473, 487]}, {"key": "property-valuation", "type": "definition", "offset": [507, 525]}, {"key": "network-administrator", "type": "clause", "offset": [631, 652]}, {"key": "detention-center", "type": "definition", "offset": [826, 842]}, {"key": "county-attorney", "type": "clause", "offset": [851, 866]}, {"key": "fiscal-court", "type": "definition", "offset": [923, 935]}, {"key": "benefits-costs", "type": "clause", "offset": [960, 974]}, {"key": "allocated-to", "type": "definition", "offset": [1062, 1074]}, {"key": "county-dispatch", "type": "definition", "offset": [1086, 1101]}, {"key": "management-administration", "type": "clause", "offset": [1117, 1144]}, {"key": "services-director", "type": "clause", "offset": [1194, 1211]}, {"key": "network-engineer", "type": "definition", "offset": [1216, 1232]}, {"key": "a-percentage", "type": "definition", "offset": [1561, 1573]}, {"key": "annual-costs", "type": "definition", "offset": [1605, 1617]}, {"key": "backup-and-disaster-recovery", "type": "clause", "offset": [1647, 1675]}, {"key": "end-users", "type": "clause", "offset": [1705, 1714]}, {"key": "the-total", "type": "clause", "offset": [1758, 1767]}, {"key": "the-network", "type": "clause", "offset": [1781, 1792]}, {"key": "performance-monitoring", "type": "clause", "offset": [1909, 1931]}, {"key": "data-communications", "type": "clause", "offset": [1946, 1965]}, {"key": "software-applications", "type": "definition", "offset": [2014, 2035]}, {"key": "single-agency", "type": "definition", "offset": [2159, 2172]}, {"key": "annual-budget", "type": "definition", "offset": [2324, 2337]}, {"key": "services-department", "type": "clause", "offset": [2362, 2381]}, {"key": "the-data", "type": "clause", "offset": [2421, 2429]}, {"key": "for-individuals", "type": "definition", "offset": [2512, 2527]}, {"key": "the-department", "type": "clause", "offset": [2531, 2545]}, {"key": "associated-with", "type": "definition", "offset": [2669, 2684]}, {"key": "software-licensing", "type": "definition", "offset": [2842, 2860]}, {"key": "for-contracts", "type": "clause", "offset": [2883, 2896]}, {"key": "an-agency", "type": "definition", "offset": [2905, 2914]}, {"key": "financial-responsibility", "type": "clause", "offset": [2958, 2982]}, {"key": "services-personnel", "type": "definition", "offset": [3147, 3165]}, {"key": "maintenance-renewals", "type": "clause", "offset": [3196, 3216]}, {"key": "specific-applications", "type": "clause", "offset": [3226, 3247]}, {"key": "project-costs", "type": "definition", "offset": [3249, 3262]}, {"key": "miscellaneous-supplies", "type": "clause", "offset": [3281, 3303]}, {"key": "cell-phone", "type": "definition", "offset": [3313, 3323]}, {"key": "number-of-users", "type": "definition", "offset": [3431, 3446]}, {"key": "elected-or-appointed-official", "type": "definition", "offset": [3585, 3614]}], "snippet": "KCFC Technology Services uses the following guidelines when allocating costs to Kenton County Clerk: To buffer for personnel changes and to accommodate cost of living wage increases, personnel costs will be allocated with a 2% increase per year. This increase will be reflected in the annual allocation matrix. \uf0b7 Software Maintenance and Development o 50% of the salary costs of the KCFC Technology Services Software Developers are allocated in 2 equal parts to the Kenton County Sheriff, and Kenton County Property Valuation Administrator \uf0b7 Network & Desktop Support o 20% of the salary costs of both the KCFC Technology Services Network Administrator and Technology Administrator are allocated in 7 equal parts to the Kenton County Clerk, Kenton County Sheriff, Kenton County Property Valuation Administrator, Kenton County Detention Center, Kenton County Attorney, Northern Kentucky Drug Strike Force, and Kenton County Fiscal Court o 75% of the salary and benefits costs of the KCFC Technology Services Network Administrator and Technology Administrator are allocated to the Kenton County Dispatch \u2013 911 Center \uf0b7 Management & Administration o 15% of the salary costs of the KCFC Technology Services Director and Network Engineer are allocated in 7 equal parts to the Kenton County Clerk, Kenton County Sheriff, Kenton County Property Valuation Administrator, Kenton County Detention Center, Kenton County Dispatch \u2013 911 Center , Kenton County Attorney, and Northern Kentucky Drug Strike Force \uf0b7 Costs based upon number of servers per Kenton County Clerk as a percentage of total servers multiplied by annual costs for the following: o Managed Backup and Disaster Recovery \uf0b7 Costs based upon number of end users per Kenton County Clerk as a percentage of the total end users on the network multiplied by annual costs for the following: o Anti-Virus, Anti-Spam, Anti-Malware Systems and Licensing o Network Performance Monitoring and Updates o Data Communications and Internet \uf0b7 Costs based upon use of specific software applications o Annual COBOL licensing - divided equally between three agencies (PVA, Sheriff, Fiscal Court) o Software used solely by a single agency but managed, installed, and supported by Kenton County Fiscal Court \u2013 fully allocated to single agency (Kenton County Dispatch \u2013 911 Center) The Total annual budget for the KCFC Technology Services Department is approximately $1.6 million dollars. The data presented in the following matrix includes salaries (and in some cases, benefits) for individuals in the department who interact most often with agencies supported by the KCFC Technology Services department. The matrix also includes costs associated with non-personnel items including network-wide disaster recovery, anti-virus, anti-spam, anti-malware, network performance and updates, data communications, and software licensing. Credits are included for contracts paid by an agency where the Kenton County Fiscal Court bears financial responsibility per KRS. There are costs in the KCFC Technology Services annual budget that are not allocated to supported agencies. These costs include additional KCFC Technology Services personnel Kenton County Clerk, software maintenance renewals for KCFC specific applications, project costs specific to KCFC, miscellaneous supplies and KCFC cell phone charges. Costs used in the matrix are based upon the FY2022 Fiscal Court budget. The number of servers and number of users in the matrix are based upon extracts from the KCFC Networking environment as performed annually and validated by the Kenton County Clerk elected or appointed official.", "size": 4, "hash": "cb1b046df6bc82f872a2e7c5d39c87f9", "id": 5}, {"samples": [{"hash": "4VXMwb8Zj0p", "uri": "/contracts/4VXMwb8Zj0p#cost-allocation-methodology", "label": "Contract", "score": 30.412946701, "published": true}], "snippet_links": [{"key": "respond-to", "type": "clause", "offset": [18, 28]}, {"key": "allocated-costs", "type": "clause", "offset": [97, 112]}, {"key": "budget-format", "type": "clause", "offset": [198, 211]}, {"key": "and-definitions", "type": "clause", "offset": [212, 227]}, {"key": "approved-by", "type": "clause", "offset": [228, 239]}, {"key": "requested-by", "type": "clause", "offset": [260, 272]}, {"key": "monthly-forecast", "type": "clause", "offset": [286, 302]}, {"key": "key-performance-indicators", "type": "definition", "offset": [329, 355]}], "snippet": "Implementer shall respond to questions or requests from PG&E\u2019s PM as to how it has calculated or allocated costs listed in the Implementer\u2019s reports, and shall make any changes, consistent with the budget format and definitions approved by the CPUC, as may be requested by the PG&E PM. Monthly Forecast of Financial Commitments\u200c Key Performance Indicators (\u201cKPI\u201d) Reporting Data\u200c CPUC Regulatory Reporting\u200c", "size": 3, "hash": "3566771e99142a4024d7604369070b8e", "id": 6}, {"samples": [{"hash": "d5JiIJ9c3aA", "uri": "/contracts/d5JiIJ9c3aA#cost-allocation-methodology", "label": "Service Agreement (Jersey Central Power & Light Co)", "score": 32.247089386, "published": true}, {"hash": "8Ne8wrj8KG3", "uri": "/contracts/8Ne8wrj8KG3#cost-allocation-methodology", "label": "Service Agreement (FirstEnergy Transmission, LLC)", "score": 31.7679672241, "published": true}], "snippet_links": [{"key": "service-company", "type": "clause", "offset": [34, 49]}, {"key": "pursuant-to-this-agreement", "type": "clause", "offset": [50, 76]}, {"key": "work-order", "type": "definition", "offset": [162, 172]}, {"key": "direct-charge", "type": "clause", "offset": [219, 232]}, {"key": "client-company", "type": "clause", "offset": [268, 282]}, {"key": "the-service-provided", "type": "clause", "offset": [308, 328]}, {"key": "appropriate-share", "type": "definition", "offset": [374, 391]}, {"key": "company-will", "type": "clause", "offset": [487, 499]}, {"key": "client-companies", "type": "definition", "offset": [519, 535]}, {"key": "the-method", "type": "definition", "offset": [549, 559]}, {"key": "cost-allocation", "type": "definition", "offset": [616, 631]}, {"key": "as-required-by-law", "type": "clause", "offset": [739, 757]}, {"key": "the-parties-hereto", "type": "clause", "offset": [798, 816]}], "snippet": "The Costs of Services provided by Service Company pursuant to this Agreement shall be directly assigned, distributed, or allocated by activity, project, program, work order or other appropriate means, as follows:\n(i) a direct charge, whereby Costs are assigned to the Client Company directly benefiting from the Service provided; and/or\n(ii) an indirect charge, whereby the appropriate share of the Costs of Services provided by Service Company that are not directly charged to a Client Company will be allocated among Client Companies by utilizing the method that most accurately distributes such Costs. Applicable cost allocation factors, which are included in FirstEnergy\u2019s cost allocation manual, will be reviewed annually and updated as required by Law or when otherwise deemed appropriate by the parties hereto.", "size": 2, "hash": "29f4491f35703f90abe93b9017ffb7e5", "id": 7}, {"samples": [{"hash": "fs8VO9pyjAt", "uri": "/contracts/fs8VO9pyjAt#cost-allocation-methodology", "label": "Memorandum of Understanding (Mou)", "score": 26.6153564453, "published": true}], "snippet_links": [{"key": "allocation-methodology", "type": "definition", "offset": [10, 32]}, {"key": "partner-program", "type": "definition", "offset": [101, 116]}, {"key": "square-footage", "type": "definition", "offset": [119, 133]}, {"key": "a-percentage", "type": "definition", "offset": [147, 159]}, {"key": "the-total", "type": "clause", "offset": [163, 172]}, {"key": "proportionate-shares", "type": "clause", "offset": [186, 206]}], "snippet": "The costs allocation methodology agreed on by co-located partners is the proportion of an individual partner program\u2019s square footage occupancy as a percentage to the total AJCC.\nA. All Proportionate Shares", "size": 2, "hash": "cbc21c493d36d310a936c57036666293", "id": 8}, {"samples": [{"hash": "47z5mrPu9IX", "uri": "/contracts/47z5mrPu9IX#cost-allocation-methodology", "label": "Memorandum of Understanding", "score": 22.5550994873, "published": true}], "snippet_links": [{"key": "to-the-extent", "type": "clause", "offset": [18, 31]}, {"key": "agency-resources", "type": "clause", "offset": [61, 77]}, {"key": "systems-integration", "type": "clause", "offset": [111, 130]}, {"key": "where-appropriate", "type": "definition", "offset": [141, 158]}, {"key": "shared-costs", "type": "clause", "offset": [164, 176]}, {"key": "allocation-method", "type": "definition", "offset": [182, 199]}, {"key": "each-party", "type": "definition", "offset": [205, 215]}], "snippet": "The Parties agree to the extent feasible to align individual agency resources to support workforce development systems integration, when and where appropriate. The shared costs, the allocation method, and each Party\u2019s share will be identified in the new RSA.", "size": 2, "hash": "f36550c9d4607e377474f19cfec9bae4", "id": 9}, {"samples": [{"hash": "gvOlTLtDs0f", "uri": "/contracts/gvOlTLtDs0f#cost-allocation-methodology", "label": "Combined Resource Sharing Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding", "score": 28.1813812256, "published": true}], "snippet_links": [{"key": "all-parties-agree", "type": "clause", "offset": [0, 17]}, {"key": "the-cost", "type": "clause", "offset": [23, 31]}, {"key": "resource-sharing-agreement", "type": "clause", "offset": [161, 187]}], "snippet": "All Parties agree that the cost allocation methodology for this IFA will be the same as described in the Cost Allocation Methodology section of the MOU, subpart Resource Sharing Agreement.", "size": 2, "hash": "660848cb8125f76b16e9b2cdca63bc22", "id": 10}], "next_curs": "CmQSXmoVc35sYXdpbnNpZGVyY29udHJhY3RzckALEhZDbGF1c2VTbmlwcGV0R3JvdXBfdjU2IiRjb3N0LWFsbG9jYXRpb24tbWV0aG9kb2xvZ3kjMDAwMDAwMGEMogECZW4YACAA", "clause": {"parents": [["signatures", "Signatures"], ["sharing-funding-responsibility", "Sharing Funding Responsibility"], ["miscellaneous", "Miscellaneous"], ["severability", "SEVERABILITY"], ["communicating-dissatisfaction", "Communicating Dissatisfaction"]], "title": "Cost Allocation Methodology", "size": 61, "children": [["number-of-participating-employees-utility-and-non-utility", "Number  of   Participating   Employees   -  Utility  and          Non-Utility"], ["multiple-factor-utility-and-non-utility", "Multiple  Factor -  Utility  and  Non-Utility"], ["", ""], ["program-shut-down-notification", "Program Shut-Down Notification"], ["number-of-participating-employees-general", "Number of  Participating  Employees - General"]], "id": "cost-allocation-methodology", "related": [["cost-allocation", "Cost Allocation", "Cost Allocation"], ["allocation-method", "Allocation Method", "Allocation Method"], ["collection-allocation-mechanism", "Collection Allocation Mechanism", "Collection Allocation Mechanism"], ["balance-computation-method", "Balance Computation Method", "Balance Computation Method"], ["claims-review-methodology", "Claims Review Methodology", "Claims Review Methodology"]], "related_snippets": [], "updated": "2025-07-23T06:00:56+00:00", "also_ask": [], "drafting_tip": "Specify cost categories, detail allocation formulas, and define adjustment procedures to ensure transparency, prevent disputes, and facilitate accurate budgeting.", "explanation": "The Cost Allocation Methodology clause defines how costs are distributed among parties involved in a contract or project. It typically outlines the specific basis for dividing expenses, such as by usage, percentage, or another agreed-upon formula, and may detail which types of costs are included or excluded. This clause ensures transparency and fairness in financial responsibilities, preventing disputes by clearly establishing how each party will share in the costs."}, "json": true, "cursor": ""}}