CONTENT OF THE AGREEMENT. The cost−share agreement shall contain or describe:
CONTENT OF THE AGREEMENT. 3.1 The Parties agree to establish a Working Time Account within the meaning of the Working Hours Act. Employees can use the Working Time Account to bank up to 60 hours of their flexitime balance over a reference period of four (4) months under this Agreement.
CONTENT OF THE AGREEMENT. 5.1 Composition of the Board of Directors and replacement of its members The Parties acknowledge that, by resolutions adopted on 1 October 2013 and 4 November 2013, the Shareholders’ Meeting of the Company has appointed, with effect from the date of beginning of trading of the Shares on the Mercato Telematico Azionario (Electronic Stock Market) and until the date of the Shareholders’ Meeting called to approve the financial statements at 31 December 2015 (the “Expiry Date”), a Board of Directors made up of 11 members, designated as follows: • 6 members, of which 2 directors having the independence requirements provided by the TUF, designated by Xxxxxxx Partecipazioni; • 3 members designated by ECIP M; • 1 member designated by CEP III; and • 1 member, having the independence requirements provided by the TUF, jointly designated by ECIP M and CEP III. The Agreement provides that:
CONTENT OF THE AGREEMENT. 5.1. The details of the services that will be provided are described at the XXXX Law School Page of the XXXX Law School that you are applying to. While all care has been taken for this information to be up-to-date, the Organising Committee reserves the right to reasonably amend the services provided.
CONTENT OF THE AGREEMENT. This Consortium Agreement and its annexes shall constitute the entire agreement among the Participants in respect of the present Collaborative Research Project, and supersede all previous negotiations, commitments and documents concerning the Collaborative Research Project including any memorandum of understanding among the Participants (whether or not with others) which relates to the present Collaborative Research Project or its proposal to ERA-CAPS. Controlling provisions The Participants guarantee that nothing in the present Consortium Agreement is contrary to the conditions defined by their Partner of ERA-CAPS for the financing of their research. In case of inconsistency between the different elements composing this Consortium Agreement, the provisions contained in the main text of this Consortium Agreement shall prevail over those contained inside annex 1 “IPR Conditions” which shall also prevail over those of annex 2.
CONTENT OF THE AGREEMENT. The agreement must have been to pursue a course of conduct that would involve the commission of the principal offence (Crimes Act 1958 s321). The prosecution must prove that the course of conduct agreed upon would involve the commission of the principal offence, rather than some different offence, or an unspecified or undecided offence (X x XxXxxx and Xxxxxx [1983] 2 VR 419; X x Xxxxxx CCA Vic 29/09/1980; X x Xxxxx & Xxxxxx [1999] 2 VR 87). Where the prosecution is based on a conspiracy to traffick in a specified drug, but the evidence establishes that the agreement related to a different drug, the conspiracy will not have been proven (DPP v Xxxxxxx & Ors (Ruling No. 7) [2007] VSC 579). This element will usually not be met in cases where the evidence only establishes that the accused agreed to commit an offence of a certain class (such as a violent offence). In such cases, the jury will often be unable to exclude the possibility that the agreement was to commit a different offence within that class, rather than the principal offence (X x XxXxxx and Xxxxxx [1983] 2 VR 419; X x Xxxxxx CCA Vic 29/09/1980). The agreement does not need to have specified who the particular victim would be, or how the offence would be carried out. There merely needs to have been an agreement to commit the principal offence (X x Xxxx and Xxxxx (1818) 2 B and Ald 204; X x Xxxxxxxx (2009) 22 VR 93). Where an agreement contemplated multiple criminal acts, the jury must unanimously find that it included an agreement to commit the principal offence (Nirta v R (1983) 79 FLR 190). The content of the agreement can be inferred from the accused’s conduct (Nirta v R (1983) 79 FLR 190; X x Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxxxx [1984] VR 417; X x Xxxxx [1922] VLR 469; Xxxxxxxxxx v R (1984) 153 CLR 317). It is not necessary that each party to the conspiracy actively participate in the commission of the planned offence (Rolls v R; Xxxxxxx v R (2011) 34 VR 80). The requirement that one of the parties must agree to pursue a course of conduct that involves the commission of an offence includes committing the offence as a secondary party (Xxx v R; Xxxxxxxx v R [2011] VSCA 404). For example, there is a conspiracy to murder where A and B agree that B would hire C, a stranger to the agreement, to kill D.
CONTENT OF THE AGREEMENT. The Agreement consists of a total of 41 Articles, six Annexes (I to VI), four Protocols (A to D), and a Record of Understanding covering the following subjects: ➢ Trade in Goods ➢ Public Procurement ➢ Intellectual Property ➢ Competition ➢ Subsidies
CONTENT OF THE AGREEMENT. 2.1. The agreement relates to the granting of a sub-authorization to use the software "Joint electronic Monitoring System", as well as the corresponding source code (collectively hereafter, "Software" or "Jems"). The City of Vienna provides Licensee with the Jems, as it is available at the time of the Agreement, without any right to a certain form.
CONTENT OF THE AGREEMENT. The parties shall implement the changes by agreeing on the new wage annex 4 for the collective agreement for the railway industry and the terms to be applied to work within its scope of application, which have been annexed to this signature protocol.
CONTENT OF THE AGREEMENT. 3.1. Under the Agreement, the following settlement procedure for the Transaction, using the Nominal Account, shall be determined:
