Compliance History Sample Clauses

Compliance History. Mxxxx shall provide Medtronic with a review of Mxxxx’x regulatory compliance history, which, in the U.S. shall include, but not be limited to: (i) any Form FDA 483 List of Inspectional Observations from FDA inspections conducted within the last five (5) years and any related correspondence between the Mxxxx and FDA; (ii) any FDA warning letters and related correspondence between the Mxxxx and FDA within the last five (5) years; and (iii) all reports and/or findings from any third party audits, including, but not limited to audits conducted by a Notified Body, and related correspondence between the Mxxxx and the third party auditor, within the last five (5) years.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Compliance History. This section contains a summary of the compliance history for this facility and was obtained from documentation contained in the District’s Administrative file.
Compliance History. Vention shall provide Nevro with a review of Vention’s regulatory compliance history related to the Products or related to the manufacturing processes used to manufacture the Products. ¨ x ¨
Compliance History. Supplier shall provide Nevro with a review of Supplier’s regulatory compliance history related to the Products or related to the manufacturing processes used to manufacture the Products. o x o
Compliance History. At SRS, waste materials regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) are managed in accordance with the requirements of RCRA. Certain SRS activities have required treatment, storage, disposal or post-closure permits under RCRA. Non-regulatory units, called solid waste management units (SWMU), include any activity where hazardous constituents may remain uncontrolled and may potentially release to the environment. Investigation and potential corrective action for these SWMU(s) are mandated under RCRA 3004(u). In 1995, SRS received a hazardous waste permit from the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) which includes corrective action requirements. Specifically, part V of the permit mandates that SRS establish and implement a RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI) Program to fulfill the requirements specified in Section 3004(u) of RCRA. <IMG SRC 97026E> <IMG SRC 97026F> Hazardous substances, as defined by CERCLA, are also present in the environment at SRS. On December 21, 1989, SRS was placed on the National Priorities List (NPL). A site placed on the NPL comes under the requirements of CERCLA. In accordance with Section 120 of CERCLA, DOE has entered into an FFA with the EPA and SCDHEC to coordinate cleanup activities at SRS into one comprehensive strategy that fulfills RCRA Section 3004(u) and CERCLA assessment, investigation, and response action requirements. The remedial investigation for Grace Road Site was completed in 1994. The results of the investigation indicate that there is no impact (or potential impact) to human health or the environment from the Grace Road Site. Therefore, no action is warranted. No other alternatives were considered. According to EPA guidance, if there is no current or potential threat to human health and the environment and no action is warranted, the CERCLA 121 requirements are not triggered. This means that there is no need to evaluate other alternatives or the no action alternative against the nine criteria specified under CERCLA. The remedy selected satisfies both the CERCLA and RCRA 3004(u) requirements. The SCDHEC has modified the SRS RCRA permit to incorporate the selected remedy. Public participation requirements are listed in Sections 113 and 117 of CERCLA. These requirements include the establishment of an Administrative Record File that documents the selection of remedial alternatives and allows for review and comment by the public regarding those alternatives. The A...
Compliance History. Upon request, Business Partner will provide COMPANY with a review of Business Partner's regulatory compliance history, which will include: (i) any observations or findings from inspections conducted by any regulatory body with authority over the Business Partners Product(s) within the last five years, and (ii) any related correspondence between the Business Partner and the associated regulatory body within the last five years. ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL Page 42 of 56 ​ ​ ​ EXHIBIT F JOINT MARKETING, TRAINING, AND CHANNEL MANAGEMENT
Compliance History. Has the facility been subject to an official enforcement action regarding its operation, including but not limited to, a notice of violation or noncompliance with a statute, regulation, or permit condition within the last five years? ☐ Yes If yes, please describe below and provide copies of each enforcement action with this application. ☐ No Description of official enforcement actions in the last five years:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Compliance History 

Related to Compliance History

  • Compliance Reporting (i) Provide reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission and the states in which the Portfolios are registered.

  • Compliance Review During the Term, Developer agrees to permit the GLO, HUD, and/or a designated representative of the GLO or HUD to access the Property for the purpose of performing Compliance-Monitoring Procedures. In accordance with GLO Compliance-Monitoring Procedures, the GLO or HUD will periodically monitor and audit Developer’s compliance with the requirements of this Agreement, the CDBG-DR Regulations, the CDBG Multifamily Rental Housing Guidelines, and any and all other Governmental Requirements during the Term. In conducting any compliance reviews, the GLO or HUD will rely primarily on information obtained from Developer’s records and reports, on-site monitoring, and audit reports. The GLO or HUD may also consider other relevant information gained from other sources, including litigation and citizen complaints. Attachment G GLO Contract No. 20-063-039-C547 5.04 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: INDEMNIFICATION

  • ETHICS COMPLIANCE All Bidders/Contractors and their employees must comply with the requirements of Sections 73 and 74 of the Public Officers Law, other State codes, rules, regulations and executive orders establishing ethical standards for the conduct of business with New York State. In signing the Bid, Bidder certifies full compliance with those provisions for any present or future dealings, transactions, sales, contracts, services, offers, relationships, etc., involving New York State and/or its employees. Failure to comply with those provisions may result in disqualification from the Bidding process, termination of contract, and/or other civil or criminal proceedings as required by law.

  • Compliance Audit LEA shall have the right but shall be under no obligation to conduct audit(s), from time to time, of Provider’s records concerning its compliance obligations as set forth in this Article V. Provider shall make such records and other documents available to LEA upon request.

  • Compliance Monitoring Grantee must be subject to compliance monitoring during the period of performance in which funds are Expended and up to three years following the closeout of all funds. In order to assure that the program can be adequately monitored, the following is required of Grantee:

  • Compliance Report The Subservicer agrees that it shall permit, not more than once per year, the Servicer, the Issuer, the Indenture Trustee or the Indenture Administrator, as the Indenture Trustee’s designee, to conduct or have conducted a procedural audit regarding the Subservicer’s compliance with the requirements of the Higher Education Act or the terms of this Agreement. Such audits shall be at the expense of the Servicer.

  • Compliance Reports The Subadvisor at its expense will provide the Advisor with such compliance reports relating to its duties under this Agreement as may be agreed upon by such parties from time to time.

  • Standards Compliance DNS. Registry Operator shall comply with relevant existing RFCs and those published in the future by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), including all successor standards, modifications or additions thereto relating to the DNS and name server operations including without limitation RFCs 1034, 1035, 1123, 1982, 2181, 2182, 2671, 3226, 3596, 3597, 4343, and 5966. DNS labels may only include hyphens in the third and fourth position if they represent valid IDNs (as specified above) in their ASCII encoding (e.g., “xn--ndk061n”).

  • Compliance Plan (1) This paragraph (h) applies to any portion of the contract that—

  • Compliance Audits D.4.1 Compliance Audit(s). Without limiting the generality of section A.7.4 (Records Review), if requested by the Province from time to time, which request shall be at the Province’s sole discretion, the Recipient, at its own expense, will forthwith retain an independent third party auditor to conduct one or more compliance audits of the Recipient or any Project. The audit will be conducted in accordance with Canadian Generally Accepted Auditing Standards, as adopted by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, applicable as of the date on which a record is kept or required to be kept under such standards. In addition, the audit will assess the Recipient’s compliance with the terms of the Agreement and will address, with respect to each Project, without limitation, the following:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.